|
|
Minimally invasive reconstruction of extensive mid-lower ureteral strictures using a bilateral Boari flap |
Shuaishuai Chaia,1,Hao Zhangb,1,Gong Chengb,Jiawei Chenb,Xincheng Gaob,Yuancheng Zhoub,Xingyuan Xiaoa,*( ),Bing Lia,*( )
|
aDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China bDepartment of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To describe and evaluate the technique using bilateral Boari flap ureteroneocystostomy (BBFUNC) for bilateral mid-lower ureteral strictures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed five patients who underwent minimally invasive BBFUNC in our institution (Union Hospital, Wuhan, China) between July 2019 and December 2021. The bilateral ureters were mobilized and transected above the stenotic segments. The bladder was isolated and incised longitudinally from the middle of the anterior wall. Then, an inverted U-shaped bladder flap was created on both sides, fixed onto the psoas tendon, and anastomosed to the ipsilateral distal normal ureter. Following double-J stenting, the Boari flaps were tubularized, and the bladder was closed with continuous sutures. The patients' perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected, and a descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: No case converted to open surgery, and no intraoperative complication occurred. The median surgical time was 230 (range 203-294) min. The median length of the bladder flaps was 6.2 (range 4.3-10.0) cm on the left and 5.5 (range 4.7-10.5) cm on the right side. All patients had not developed recurrent ureteral stenosis during the median follow-up time of 17 (range 16-45) months and had a normal maximum flow rate after surgery. The median post-void residual was 7 (range 0-19) mL. The maximal bladder capacity was decreased in one (20%) patient. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that minimally invasive BBFUNC is feasible and safe in treating bilateral mid-lower ureteral strictures, and the impact on lower urinary tract function is limited.
|
Received: 19 August 2023
Available online: 20 July 2024
|
Corresponding Authors:
*E-mail address: 114714259@qq.com (X. Xiao),bingli2023@whu.edu.cn (B. Li).
|
About author:: 1Both authors contributed equally to this work. |
|
|
Patient characteristic | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | Median (range) | Age, year | 49 | 46 | 55 | 34 | 55 | 49 (34-55) | Gender | Female | Female | Male | Male | Female | - | BMI, kg/m2 | 18.6 | 18.0 | 27.0 | 27.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 (18.0-27.0) | Etiology | RH | CRT | Bilateral EUL | EUL for left; CO for right | RH and CRT | - | Preoperative symptoms | Fever and vomit | Nausea, vomiting, and urinary urgency and frequency | None | Left flank pain | Bilateral flank pain | - | Stricture locationa | | | | | | | Left | S3 | S2 | S3 | S2 | L5 | - | Right | S3 | S1 | S2 | S2 | L5 | - | Preoperative hydronephrosisb | | | | | | | Left | Grade 3 | Grade 2 | Grade 4 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | - | Right | Grade 3 | Grade 3 | Grade 2 | Grade 4 | Grade 3 | - | Preoperative SRF, mL/min | | | | | | | Left | 33.7 | 46.3 | 9.6 | 55.6 | 47.4 | 46.3 (9.6-55.6) | Right | 35.7 | 21.4 | 74.6 | 45.0 | 49.8 | 45.0 (21.4-74.6) |
|
Preoperative patient characteristics.
|
|
Port placement. (A) Robot-assisted BBFUNC; (B) Laparoscopic BBFUNC. BBFUNC, bilateral Boari flap ureteroneocystostomy.
|
|
Main steps of robot-assisted bilateral Boari flap ureteroneocystostomy. (A) After the bladder was fully dissociated, an inverted U-shape Boari flap was fashioned on both sides according to the length of ureteral defects with a broad base; (B) The Boari flaps were fixed to the ipsilateral psoas muscle; (C) A 10 Fr catheter was used to detect the patency of the proximal ureteral stump before anastomosis; (D) The Boari flap was anastomosed to the ipsilateral ureter after double-J stenting; (E) The Boari flaps were tubularized, and the bladder incision was closed; (F) A leakage test was performed. The ureterovesical anastomosis sites were marked by white arrows. The yellow and blue dash line represented the left and right bladder muscle flaps, respectively. LF, left flap; RF, right flap.
|
Perioperative and follow-up results | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | Median (range) | Procedure | L-BBFUNC | RA-BBFUNC | L-BBFUNC | RA-BBFUNC | L-BBFUNC | - | Operative time, min | 237 | 210 | 294 | 203 | 230 | 230 (203-294) | Flap length, cm | | | | | | | Left | 5.2 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 10.0 | 6.2 (4.3-10.0) | Right | 4.7 | 9.8 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 10.5 | 5.5 (4.7-10.5) | Estimated blood loss, mL | 40 | 150 | 110 | 80 | 50 | 80 (40-150) | Intraoperative complication | None | None | None | None | None | - | Postoperative hospitalization, day | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 (6-7) | Postoperative hydronephrosis | | | | | | | Left | Grade 0 | Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | - | Right | Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | - | Postoperative SRF, mL/min | | | | | | | Left | 30.2 | 45.4 | 12.9 | 49.6 | 68.4 | 45.4 (12.9-68.4) | Right | 49.5 | 23.1 | 82.1 | 42.9 | 59.8 | 49.5 (23.1-82.1) | Symptoms after surgerya | | | | | | | 3 months | FPV | FPV and FU | FPV | FPV and FU | None | - | 6 months | None | None | None | None | None | - | LUT function assessment after surgeryb | | | | | | | Post-void residual, mL | 0 | 3 | 7 | 19 | 10 | 7 (0-19) | Qmax, mL/s | 44.5 | 27.8 | 18.2 | 19.5 | 26.9 | 26.9 (18.2-44.5) | Maximal bladder capacity, mL | 405 | 517 | 282 | 530 | 488 | 488 (282-530) | Follow-up time, month | 45 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 17 (16-45) |
|
Perioperative and follow-up data.
|
|
AU and CT urography of Case 4. (A) Right AU before surgery; (B) Left AU before surgery; (C) Bilateral AU 6 weeks after surgery; (D) Hydronephrosis before surgery; (E) Hydronephrosis significantly relieved 6 months after surgery. AU, antegrade urography.
|
|
Voiding cystourethrogram of Case 1. (A) Six weeks after surgery—the bladder was approximately V-shaped, and the bilateral VUR was evident; (B) Eighteen months after surgery (storage period)—the bladder morphology was closer to normal, and the capacity had increased, but bilateral VUR still existed (the arrows indicated the VUR on the right side); (C) Eighteen months after surgery (urination period)—the contrast agent was fully discharged; (D) Thirty-two months after surgery (oblique right lateral view)—the VUR on the right side disappeared. VUR, vesicoureteral reflux.
|
[1] |
Engel O, Rink M, Fisch M. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury and techniques for ureteral reconstruction. Curr Opin Urol 2015; 25:331-5.
|
[2] |
Lee Z, Waldorf BT, Cho EY, Liu JC, Metro MJ, Eun DD. Robotic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft for the management of complex ureteral strictures. J Urol 2017; 198:1430-5.
|
[3] |
Liang C, Wang J, Hai B, Xu Y, Zeng J, Chai S, et al. Lingual mucosal graft ureteroplasty for long proximal ureteral stricture: 6 years of experience with 41 cases. Eur Urol 2022; 82:193-200.
|
[4] |
Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23:478-80.
|
[5] |
Musch M, Hohenhorst L, Pailliart A, Loewen H, Davoudi Y, Kroepfl D. Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients. BJU Int 2013; 111:773-83.
|
[6] |
Stolzenburg JU, Rai BP, Do M, Dietel A, Liatsikos E, Ganzer R, et al. Robot-assisted technique for Boari flap ureteric reimplantation: replicating the techniques of open surgery in robotics. BJU Int 2016; 118:482-4.
|
[7] |
El Abd AS, El-Abd SA, El-Enen MA, Tawfik AM, Soliman MG, Farha MA, et al. Immediate and late management of iatrogenic ureteric injuries: 28 years of experience. Arab J Urol 2015; 13:250-7.
|
[8] |
Slawin J, Patel NH, Lee Z, Dy GW, Kim D, Asghar A, et al. Ureteral reimplantation via robotic nontransecting side-toside anastomosis for distal ureteral stricture. J Endourol 2020; 34:836-9.
|
[9] |
Armatys SA, Mellon MJ, Beck SD, Koch MO, Foster RS, Bihrle R. Use of ileum as ureteral replacement in urological reconstruction. J Urol 2009; 181:177-81.
|
[10] |
Burks FN, Santucci RA. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury. Ther Adv Urol 2014; 6:115-24.
|
[11] |
Kocot A, Kalogirou C, Vergho D, Riedmiller H. Long-term results of ileal ureteric replacement: a 25-year single-centre experience. BJU Int 2017; 120:273-9.
|
[12] |
Elbers JR, Rodriguez Socarras M, Rivas JG, Autran AM, Esperto F, Tortolero L, et al. Robotic repair of ureteral strictures: techniques and review. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8
pmid: 34105032
|
[13] |
Ficarra V, Rossanese M, Crestani A, Caloggero S, Alario G, Novara G, et al. A contemporary case series of complex surgical repair of surgical/endoscopic injuries to the abdominal ureter. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7:1476-84.
|
[14] |
Li Y, Li C, Yang S, Song C, Liao W, Xiong Y. Reconstructing fulllength ureteral defects using a spiral bladder muscle flap with vascular pedicles. Urology 2014; 83:1199-204.
|
[15] |
Sanadizadeh SM, McCague NJ. Repair of lower ureteral injuries using bladder flap. J Urol 1967; 98:81-5.
|
[16] |
Thompson IM, Karow WF, Ross G Jr. Long-term results of ureteral reimplantation for trauma. J Urol 1969; 102:308-15.
|
[17] |
Sagalovich D, Garisto J, Bertolo R, Yerram N, Dagenais J, Chavali JS, et al. Minimally invasive management of ureteral distal strictures: robotic ureteroneocystostomy with a bilateral boari flap. Urology 2018; 120:268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.023
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.023
pmid: 30077539
|
[18] |
Lee Z, Moore B, Giusto L, Eun DD. Use of indocyanine green during robot-assisted ureteral reconstructions. Eur Urol 2015; 67:291-8.
|
[1] |
Tenny R. Zhang, Ashley Alford, Lee C. Zhao. Summarizing the evidence for robotic-assisted bladder neck reconstruction: Systematic review of patency and incontinence outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 341-347. |
[2] |
David Strauss, Eric Cho, Matthew Loecher, Matthew Lee, Daniel Eun. Description of a novel robotic early post-prostatectomy anastomotic repair technique and institutional outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 366-372. |
[3] |
Junjie Wang, Ximing Wang, Haozhou Zhong, Wengui Xie, Qilin Xi. Prospective observational study on the prognosis of ureteral lesions caused by impacted stones via dual-energy spectral computed tomography[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 534-540. |
[4] |
Simone Sforza,Valeria Emma Palmieri,Maria Rosaria Raspollini,Giandomenico Roviello,Alberto Mantovani,Umberto Basso,Maria Carmen Affinita,Alberto D’Angelo,Lorenzo Antonuzzo,Marco Carini,Andrea Minervini,Lorenzo Masieri. Robotic approach with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in adult Wilms’ tumor: A feasibility study report and a systematic review of the literature[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(2): 128-136. |
[5] |
Dilip K. Mishra,Sonia Bhatt,Sundaram Palaniappan,Talamanchi V.K. Reddy,Vinothkumar Rajenthiran,Y.L. Sreeranga,Madhu S. Agrawal. Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(1): 75-80. |
[6] |
Gilberto José Rodrigues,Giuliano Betoni Guglielmetti,Marcelo Orvieto,Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat,Vipul R. Patel,Rafael Ferreira Coelho. Robot-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: A review of current outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(1): 20-26. |
[7] |
Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat,Marcio Covas Moschovas,Vipul R. Patel,Young Hwii Ko. The robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction in adult: A narrative review on the surgical techniques and contemporary outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(1): 38-49. |
[8] |
Marcio Covas Moschovas,Frederico Timóteo,Leonardo Lins,Oséas de Castro Neves,Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat,Vipul R. Patel. Robotic surgery techniques to approach benign prostatic hyperplasia disease: A comprehensive literature review and the state of art[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(1): 81-88. |
[9] |
Paula Andrea Peña,Lynda Torres-Castellanos,Germán Patiño,Stefanía Prada,Luis Gabriel Villarraga,Nicolás Fernández. Minimally invasive nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(4): 345-350. |
[10] |
Weibin Xie,Junming Bi,Qiang Wei,Ping Han,Dongkui Song,Lei Shi,Dingwei Ye,Yijun Shen,Xin Gou,Weiyang He,Shaogang Wang,Zheng Liu,Jinhai Fan,Kaijie Wu,Zhiwen Chen,Xiaozhou Zhou,Chuize Kong,Yang Liu,Chunxiao Liu,Abai Xu,Baiye Jin,Guanghou Fu,Wei Xue,Haige Chen,Tiejun Pan,Zhong Tu,Tianxin Lin,Jian Huang. Survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Multicenter comparison between minimally invasive and open approaches[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(3): 291-300. |
[11] |
Najib Isse Dirie,Shaogang Wang. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in adults: A single surgeon experience and literature review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 37-44. |
[12] |
Xiaofeng Zou,Guoxi Zhang,Tianpeng Xie,Yuanhu Yuan,Rihai Xiao,Gengqing Wu,Xiaoning Wang,Hui Xu,Folin Liu,Yuting Wu,Yunfeng Liao,Quanliang Liu,Yinghao Sun,Bo Yang,Linhui Wang,Chuanliang Xu,Xiaofeng Gao. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: The Chinese experience[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 1-9. |
[13] |
Gild Philipp,A. Kluth Luis,W. Vetterlein Malte,Engel Oliver,K.H. Chun Felix,Fisch Margit. Adult iatrogenic ureteral injury and stricture-incidence and treatment strategies[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(2): 101-106. |
[14] |
Dong Hao,Peng Yonghan,Li Ling,Gao Xiaofeng. Prevention strategies for ureteral stricture following ureteroscopic lithotripsy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(2): 94-100. |
[15] |
S.J.Chung Amanda,H.Woo Henry. Update on minimally invasive surgery and benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(1): 22-27. |
|
|
|
|