Please wait a minute...
Search Asian J Urol Advanced Search
Share 
Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 384-390    doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.10.002
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
Robot-assisted uretero-enteric reimplantation for uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Surgical approach and outcomes over two decades
Abdul Wasay Mahmood,Grace Harrington,Zhe Jing,Qiang Li,Ahmed A. Hussein,Khurshid A. Guru*()
Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York, NY, USA
下载:  HTML  PDF (1230KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract: 

Objective: We described the technique and outcomes of robot-assisted repair of uretero-enteric strictures (UES) following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and urinary diversion.

Methods: Retrospective review of our RARC database from November 2005 to August 2023 at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer center was performed. Patients who developed UES and ultimately underwent robot-assisted uretero-enteric reimplantation (RUER) were identified. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute the cumulative incidence recurrence rate of UES after RUER. A multivariable regression model was used to identify variables associated with UES recurrence.

Results: A total of 123 (15%) out of 808 RARC patients developed UES, of whom 52 underwent reimplantation (45 patients underwent RUER [n=55 cases] and seven patients underwent open uretero-enteric reimplantation). The median time from RARC to UES was 4.4 (interquartile range 3.0-7.0) months, and the median time between UES and RUER was 5.2 (interquartile range 3.2-8.9) months. The 3-year recurrence rate after RUER is about 29%. On multivariable analysis, longer hospital stay (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.61, p<0.01) was associated with recurrent UES after RUER.

Conclusion: RUER for UES after RARC is feasible with durable outcomes although a notable subset of patients experienced postoperative complications and UES recurrence.

Key words:  Stricture    Cystectomy    Reimplantation    Robot-assisted
收稿日期:  2023-06-16           接受日期:  2023-10-09      出版日期:  2024-07-20      发布日期:  2024-08-13      整期出版日期:  2024-07-20
引用本文:    
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 384-390.
Abdul Wasay Mahmood, Grace Harrington, Zhe Jing, Qiang Li, Ahmed A. Hussein, Khurshid A. Guru. Robot-assisted uretero-enteric reimplantation for uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Surgical approach and outcomes over two decades. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 384-390.
链接本文:  
http://www.ajurology.com/CN/10.1016/j.ajur.2023.10.002  或          http://www.ajurology.com/CN/Y2024/V11/I3/384
  
Variable No UES after RUER (n=42) UES after RUER (n=13) Total (n=55) p-Value
Parameters at the time of RARC
Gender (male) 38 (90) 11 (85) 49 (89) 0.62
African American 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) -
Charlson Comorbidity Index 5 (4-6) 4 (3-5) 4 (4-6) 0.4
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy 19 (45) 7 (54) 26 (47) 0.75
History of abdominal surgery before cystectomy 20 (48) 10 (77) 30 (55) 0.11
History of radiation before cystectomy 2 (5) 1 (8) 3 (5) 0.56
Intracorporeal approach urinary diversion at cystectomy 41 (98) 12 (92) 53 (96) 0.42
Neobladder urinary diversion 7 (17) 0 (0) 7 (13) 0.18
Ileal conduit urinary diversion 35 (83) 13 (100) 48 (87) -
Type of ureteral anastomosisa
Bricker 36 (88) 13 (100) 49 (91) 0.32
Wallace 5 (12) 0 (0) 5 (9) -
Stent placement at cystectomy 37 (88) 12 (92) 49 (89) 1
Parameters at the time of RUER
Age at RUER, year 69 (61-73) 65 (61-69) 66 (61-73) 0.51
BMI at RUER, kg/m2 29 (27-34) 27 (23-32) 29 (25-33) 0.21
Months from RARC to UES 4.5 (3.3-7.5) 3.9 (1.9-5.5) 4.4 (3.0-7.0) 0.18
Months from UES to RUER 4.8 (2.5-8.9) 5.3 (4.1-9.4) 5.2 (3.2-8.9) 0.33
Estimated blood loss, mL 50 (20-88) 150 (100-150) 50 (25-120) 0.001
Type of ureteral anastomosis
Bricker 40 (95) 10 (77) 50 (91) 0.08
Wallace 2 (5) 2 (15) 4 (7) -
Left to right 0 (0) 1 (8) 1 (2) -
Stent placement at RUER 19 (45) 7 (54) 26 (47) 0.75
Operative time, min 163 (129-186) 179 (170-279) 174 (135-189) 0.03
Transfusion 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) -
Conversion to open 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) -
Laterality of RUER
Left side 31 (74) 6 (46) 37 (67) 0.09
Right side 11 (26) 7 (54) 18 (33) -
LOS, day 3 (2-4) 6 (2-7) 3 (2-4) 0.03
ICU admission 6 (14) 1 (8) 7 (13) 1
ICG intraoperative use 10 (24) 1 (8) 11 (20) 0.27
GFR, mL/min
Before RUER 44 (37-67) 41 (34-56) 43 (36-66) 0.59
Day 90 after RUER 46 (34-58) 41 (35-48) 43 (34-56) 0.59
Number of conservative managements before RUER 2 (2-3) 2 (1-3) 2 (2-3) 0.67
  
Variable No UES after RUER (n=42) UES after RUER (n=13) Total (n=55) p-Value
Any complication 20 (48) 11 (85) 31 (56) 0.03
Wound (incision hernia) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) -
Gastrointestinal (ileus) 1 (2) 1 (8) 2 (4) 0.42
Genitourinary (ureteral leakage) 0 (0) 2 (15) 2 (4) 0.05
Infectious
Sepsis 1 (2) 1 (8) 2 (4) 0.42
UTI 8 (19) 2 (15) 10 (18) 1
High-grade (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or higher) complication 9 (21) 3 (23) 12 (22) 1
Re-admission 6 (14) 1 (8) 7 (13) 1
  
  
[1] Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F, Ambler G, Williams NR, Al- Hammouri T, et al. Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs. open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022; 327:2092-103.
[2] Mastroianni R, Ferriero M, Tuderti G, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, et al. Open radical cystectomy versus robotassisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: early outcomes of a single-center randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2022; 207:982-92.
[3] Packiam VT, Agrawal VA, Cohen AJ, Pariser JJ, Johnson SC, Bales GT, et al. Lessons from 151 ureteral reimplantations for postcystectomy ureteroenteric strictures: a single-center experience over a decade. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:e19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.005
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.005
[4] Amin KA, Vertosick EA, Stearns G, Fathollahi A, Sjoberg DD, Donat MS, et al. Predictors of benign ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology 2020; 144:225-9.
[5] Yang DY, Boorjian SA, Westerman MB, Tarrell RF, Thapa P, Viers BR. Persistent, long-term risk for ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture formation: the case for long term follow-up. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:142-50.
[6] Reesink DJ, Gerritsen SL, Kelder H, Hhev Melick, Stijns PEF. Evaluation of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after the introduction of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: results from a large tertiary referral center. J Urol 2021; 205:1119-25.
[7] Goh AC, Belarmino A, Patel NA, Sun T, Sedrakyan A, Bochner BH, et al. A population-based study of ureteroenteric strictures after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Urology 2020; 135:57-65.
[8] Lucas JW, Ghiraldi E, Ellis J, Friedlander JI. Endoscopic management of ureteral strictures: an update. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 19:24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0773-4
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0773-4 pmid: 29500521
[9] Dangle PP, Abaza R. Robot-assisted repair of ureteroileal anastomosis strictures: initial cases and literature review. J Endourol 2012; 26:372-6.
[10] Lee Z, Lee M, Lee R, Koster H, Cheng N, Siev M, et al. Ureteral rest is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing robotic ureteral reconstruction of proximal and middle ureteral strictures. Urology 2021; 152:160-6.
[11] Magnusson J, Hagberg O, Aljabery F, Hosseini A, Jahnson S, Jerlstr?m T, et al. Cumulative incidence of ureteroenteric strictures after radical cystectomy in a population-based Swedish cohort. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:361-5.
[12] Sch?ndorf D, Meierhans-Ruf S, Kiss B, Giannarini G, Thalmann GN, Studer UE, et al. Ureteroileal strictures after urinary diversion with an ileal segmentdis there a place for endourological treatment at all? J Urol 2013; 190:585-90.
[13] Carrion A, Hussein AA, Eun D, Hosseini A, Gaya JM, Abaza R, et al. Perioperative and functional outcomes of robot-assisted ureteroenteric reimplantation: a multicenter study of seven referral institutions. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022; 35:47-53.
[14] Lee Z, Sterling ME, Keehn AY, Lee M, Metro MJ, Eun DD. The use of indocyanine green during robotic ureteroenteric reimplantation for the management of benign anastomotic strictures. World J Urol 2019; 37:1211-6.
[15] Houenstein HA, Jing Z, Elsayed AS, Ramahi YO, St?ckle M, Wijburg C, et al. Analysis of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy between 2002e2021. Urology 2023; 171:133-9.
[16] Anderson CB, Morgan TM, Kappa S, Moore D, Clark PE, Davis R, et al. Ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after radical cystectomyddoes operative approach matter? J Urol 2013; 189:541-7.
[17] Ramahi YO, Shiekh M, Shah AA, Houenstein H, Ely HB, Shabir U, et al. Uretero-enteric strictures after robot assisted radical cystectomy: prevalence and management over two decades. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:e19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.006
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.006
[18] Hosseini A, Dey L, Laurin O, Adding C, Hoijer J, Ebbing J, et al. Ureteric stricture rates and management after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a single-centre observational study. Scand J Urol 2018; 52:244-8.
[19] Ahmed YE, Hussein AA, May PR, Ahmad B, Ali T, Durrani A, et al. Natural history, predictors and management of ureteroenteric strictures after robot assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol 2017; 198:567-74.
[20] Tuderti G, Brassetti A, Minisola F, Anceschi U, Ferriero M, Leonardo C, et al. Transnephrostomic indocyanine greenguided robotic ureteral reimplantation for benign ureteroileal strictures after robotic cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder: step-by-step surgical technique, perioperative and functional outcomes. J Endourol 2019; 33:823-8.
[21] Ericson KJ, Thomas LJ, Zhang JH, Knorr JM, Khanna A, Crane A, et al. Uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture following radical cystectomy: a comparison of open, robotic extracorporeal, and robotic intracorporeal approaches. Urology 2020; 144:130-5.
[22] Richards KA, Cohn JA, Large MC, Bales GT, Smith ND, Steinberg GD. The effect of length of ureteral resection on benign ureterointestinal stricture rate in ileal conduit or ileal neobladder urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.05.015
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.05.015
[23] Lobo N, Dupré S, Sahai A, Thurairaja R, Khan MS. Getting out of a tight spot: an overview of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures. Nat Rev Urol 2016; 13:447-55.
[24] Laven BA, O’Connor RC, Gerber GS, Steinberg GD. Long-term results of endoureterotomy and open surgical revision for the management of ureteroenteric strictures after urinary diversion. J Urol 2003; 170:1226-30.
[25] Gin GE, Ruel NH, Parihar JS, Warner JN, Yuh BE, Yamzon J, et al. Ureteroenteric anastomotic revision as initial management of stricture after urinary diversion. Int J Urol 2017; 24:390-5.
[26] Msezane L, Reynolds WS, Mhapsekar R, Gerber G, Steinberg G. Open surgical repair of ureteral strictures and fistulas following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. J Urol 2008; 179:1428-31.
[27] Carrion A, Pi?ero A, Raventós C, Lozano F, Díaz F, Morote J. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs. intracorporeal urinary diversion. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 2019;43:277-83.
No related articles found!
[1] Brian W. Chao, Daniel D. Eun. Robotic reconstructive surgery: The time has arrived[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 339 -340 .
[2] Daniel A. Wollin,Adam G. Kaplan,Glenn M. Preminger,Pietro Manuel Ferraro,Antonio Nouvenne,Andrea Tasca,Emanuele Croppi,Giovanni Gambaro,Ita P. Heilberg. Defining metabolic activity of nephrolithiasis - Appropriate evaluation and follow-up of stone formers[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 235 -242 .
[3] Rajeev Thekumpadam Puthenveetil, Debajit Baishya, Sasanka Barua, Debanga Sarma. Unusual case of nephrocutaneous fi stula -Our experience[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2016, 3(1): 56 -58 .
[4] Ponco Birowo,Nur Rasyid,Chaidir A. Mochtar,Bambang S. Noegroho,H.R. Danarto,Besut Daryanto,Lukman Hakim,Dyandra Parikesit,Fakhri Rahman,S. Cahyo Ariwicaksono. Daily activities and training experiences of urology residents during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Indonesia: A nationwide survey[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(2): 119 -127 .
[5] Dean Laganosky,Christopher P. Filson,Dattatraya Patil,Viraj A. Master. Survival benefit with extended lymphadenectomy for advanced renal malignancy: A population-based analysis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 29 -36 .
[6] Yezi Zhu,Jun Luo. Regulation of androgen receptor variants in prostate cancer[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(3): 251 -257 .
[7] Stilianos Giannakopoulos,Halil Arif,Zisis Nastos,Apostolos Liapis,Christos Kalaitzis,Stavros Touloupidis. Laparoscopic transvesical vesicovaginal fistula repair with the least invasive way: Only three trocars and a limited posterior cystotomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(4): 351 -356 .
[8] Yang Chen,Tianyu Li,Jiwen Cheng. Ambiguous clear cell carcinoma in medullary sponge kidney: A case report[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(4): 369 -372 .
[9] Kenji Omae,Noriaki Kurita,Sei Takahashi,Shingo Fukuma,Yosuke Yamamoto,Shunichi Fukuhara,The Sukagawa Study Group. Association of advanced glycation end-product accumulation with overactive bladder in community-dwelling elderly: A cross-sectional Sukagawa study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(2): 189 -196 .
[10] Nora Naqos,Wafaa Kaikani. Prostate cancer—highlights from American Society of Clinical Oncology virtual meeting 2020[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(3): 282 -286 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed