|
|
Electrophysiological evaluation of alterations in penile sensation due to penile prosthesis implantation in patients with erectile dysfunction |
İbrahim Erola,*( ),Ali Yıldıza,Kaan Karamıka,Hakan Anıla,Ekrem İslamoğlua,Tuncay Çakırb,Mutlu Ateşa,Murat Savaşa
|
aDepartment of Urology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey bDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey |
|
|
Abstract Objective: The present study was aimed to determine the effect of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) surgery on penile sensation by evaluating the penile electromyography (EMG) variables. Methods: The research was designed as a prospective study. Thirty patients who were diagnosed with organic erectile dysfunction and had underwent PPI surgery between January 2017 and January 2018 in the Urology Clinic of Antalya Training and Research Hospital were included in this study. Penile sensory EMG was performed on each patient 1 day prior to the surgery by the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation clinic. Additionally, the control EMG study was also performed in the 3rd and 6th postoperative months. Results: We included 27 patients in this study who attended regular follow-ups and had complete EMG results. Out of the 27 patients, 23 (85.2%) patients had received malleable (ProMedon) penile prosthesis, one (3.7%) patient had received a two-piece inflatable (Ambicor) penile prosthesis, and three (11.1%) patients had received a three-piece inflatable (AMS 700 CXR) penile prosthesis. The mean nerve conduction value (NCV) of the patients was 29.85 (standard derivation: 22.54; range: 0-78.4) m/s during the preoperative period, whereas it was 27.64 (standard derivation: 24.72; range: 0-83.3) m/s in the 3rd postoperative month and 24.80 (standard derivation: 22.31; range: 0-88.4) m/s in the 6th postoperative month. There was no significant difference between preoperative NCV and 3rd postoperative month NCV (p=0.607). Similarly, no significant difference was observed between preoperative NCV and 6th postoperative month NCV (p=0.276). Additionally, the change between NCV values at postoperative 3rd and 6th months was not statistically significant (p=0.553). Conclusion: Significant loss of penile sensation does not occur in patients who undergo PPI surgery.
|
Received: 28 February 2021
Available online: 20 October 2023
|
Corresponding Authors:
*E-mail address: irbam07@hotmail.com (İ. Erol).
|
|
|
|
Penile electromyography.
|
Demographic feature | n (%) | The married | 22 (81.5) | Diabetes | 10 (37.0) | Hypertension | 16 (59.3) | Coronary artery disease | 7 (25.9) | Smoking | 6 (22.2) | Peyronie’s disease | 1 (3.7) | Radiotherapy | 3 (11.1) | Radical prostatectomy | 7 (25.9) | Preoperative severe ED | 27 (100.0) | Penile Doppler ultrasonography result | | Bilateral arterial insufficiency | 20 (74.1) | Mix type insufficiency | 2 (7.4) | Normala | 4 (14.8) | Left arterial insufficiency | 1 (3.7) | Prosthetic type | | Malleable (Promedon)b | 23 (85.2) | Two-piece (Ambicor)c | 1 (3.7) | Three-piece (AMS 700 CXR)d | 3 (11.1) | Complication | | Penile and scrotal hematoma | 2 (7.4) | Migration and urethral trauma | 1 (3.7) | Superficial wound infection | 1 (3.7) | Total | 4 (14.8) | | |
|
Demographic characteristics of patients.
|
Characteristic | Mean±SD | Range | p-Valuea,b | p-Value (3-6 months)b,c | NCV, m/s | | | | | Preoperative | 29.85±22.54 | 0-78.4 | | | NCV in the 3rd postoperative month | 27.64±24.72 | 0-83.3 | 0.607 | | NCV in the 6th postoperative month | 24.80±22.31 | 0-88.4 | 0.276 | 0.553 | Amplitude, mV | | | | | Preoperative | 4.83±5.07 | 0-22.0 | | | Amplitude in the 3rd postoperative month | 4.74±5.24 | 0-24.0 | 0.753 | | Amplitude in the 6th postoperative month | 4.84±7.29 | 0-36.0 | 0.989 | 0.951 | Latency, ms | | | | | Preoperative | 2.05±2.44 | 0-11.9 | | | Latency in the 3rd postoperative month | 1.91±2.10 | 0-10.1 | 0.627 | | Latency in the 6th postoperative month | 1.88±1.98 | 0-9.8 | 0.815 | 1.000 |
|
Comparison of EMG values (biothesiometer) (n=27).
|
[1] |
Gratzke C, Angulo J, Chitaley K, Dai YT, Kim NN, Paick JS, et al. Anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7:445-75.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01624.x
|
[2] |
Antonini G, Busetto GM, De Berardinis E, Giovannone R, Vicini P, Del Giudice F, et al. Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications. Int J Impot Res 2016; 28:4-8.
doi: 10.1038/ijir.2015.33
pmid: 26657316
|
[3] |
Bradley WE, Lin JT, Johnson B. Measurement of the conduction velocity of the dorsal nerve of the penis. J Urol 1984; 131: 1127-9.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50841-1
pmid: 6726911
|
[4] |
Clawson DR, Cardenas DD, Clawson DR, Cardenas DD. Dorsal nerve of the penis nerve conduction velocity: a new technique. Muscle Nerve 1991; 14:845-9.
pmid: 1922179
|
[5] |
Xie D, Nicholas M, Gheiler V, Perito D, Siano L, Kislinger I, et al. A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6:529-33.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.34
pmid: 28725595
|
[6] |
Evans C. The use of penile prostheses in the treatment of impotence. Br J Urol 1998; 81:591-8.
pmid: 9598633
|
[7] |
Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Penile prosthesis implantation. Urol Clin 2001; 28:355-61.
|
[8] |
Villarreal HG, Jones L. Outcomes of and satisfaction with the inflatable penile prosthesis in the elderly male. Adv Urol 2012; 2012:240963. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/240963.
|
[9] |
Sasso F, Gulino G, Alcini E. Corpus cavernosum electromyography (CC-EMG): a new technique in the diagnostic work-up of impotence. Int Urol Nephrol 1996; 28:805-18.
pmid: 9089051
|
[10] |
Yang CC, Bradley WE. Innervation of the human glans penis. J Urol 1999; 161:97-102.
pmid: 10037378
|
[11] |
Kaneko S, Bradley WE. Penile electrodiagnosis: penile peripheral innervation. Urology 1987; 30:210-2.
pmid: 3629761
|
[12] |
Halata Z, Spaethe A. Sensory innervation of the human penis. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997; 424:265-6.
pmid: 9361804
|
[13] |
Brinkman MJ, Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR, Denny GA, Young M, et al. A survey of patients with inflatable penile prostheses for satisfaction. J Urol 2005; 174:253-7.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161608.21337.8d
pmid: 15947649
|
[14] |
Levine LA, Becher E, Bella A, Brant W, Kohler T, Martinez- Salamanca JI, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med 2016; 13:489-518.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017
|
[15] |
Soylu A, Yilmaz U, Ozcan C, Sarier M, Baydinc C. Role of penile electrodermal activity in the evaluation of autonomic innervation of corpus cavernosum. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 535-9.
pmid: 15201861
|
[16] |
Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, Egydio P, Vespasiani G, Miano R, et al. Simultaneous penile lengthening and penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease, refractory erectile dysfunction, and severe penile shortening. J Sex Med 2012; 9:316-21.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02509.x
|
[17] |
Ertekin C, Akyürekli ?, Gürses AN, Turgut H. The value of somatosensory-evoked potentials and bulbocavernosus reflex in patients with impotence. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1985; 71: 48-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1985.tb03166.x
|
[18] |
Ertekin C, Reel F. Bulbocavernosus reflex in normal men and in patients with neurogenic bladder and/or impotence. J Neurol Sci 1976; 28:1-15.
doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(76)90044-7
pmid: 180261
|
[19] |
Ewing R, Choa B, Shuttleworth K. Pelvic evoked responses. Br J Urol 1983; 55:639-41.
pmid: 6652431
|
[20] |
Herbert J. The role of the dorsal nerves of the penis in the sexual behaviour of the male rhesus monkey. Physiol Behav 1973; 10:293-300.
pmid: 4350731
|
[21] |
Larsson K, S?dersten P. Mating in male rats after section of the dorsal penile nerve. Physiol Behav 1973; 10:567-71.
pmid: 4708522
|
[1] |
Eric Chung. A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(3): 287-293. |
[2] |
Fulvio Colombo,Giorgio Gentile,Valerio Vagnoni,Alessandro Fiorillo,Pietro Piazza,Fabrizio Sartorio,Alessandro Franceschelli. Initial experience of a single center with the use of ZSI 475 penile prosthesis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(2): 176-182. |
[3] |
Nicolas Turmel,Samer Sheikh Ismael,Camille Chesnel,Audrey Charlanes,Claire Hentzen,Frédérique Le Breton,Gérard Amarenco. Use of a specific questionnaire and perineal electromyography to assess neuropathic pain after radical retropubic prostatectomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(4): 364-367. |
[4] |
Kok Kit Ng, Foo Cheong Ng. The use of antimuscarinics, phosphodiesterase type V inhibitors and phytotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(3): 191-194. |
|
|
|
|