|
|
Uroflowmetric analysis and derivation of nomograms for normal paediatric Indian population between 5 to 15 years of age |
Abhay D. Mahajan*( ),Lakshman P. Singh,Prashant P. Darakh,Sandeep T. Bathe,Martand G. Patil,Arpit R. Sharma
|
Mahatma Gandhi Mission Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India |
|
|
Abstract Objective: We aimed to established normal uroflowmetric values and subsequently derived nomograms of maximum flow rate (Qmax) and average flow rate (Qavg) against voided volume (VV) in children aged 5-15 years at our institute. Methods: A total of 440 children underwent uroflowmetric evaluation with no history of urological, renal, psychiatric, or neurological disorder between 5 and 15 years of age. Each subject data regarding Qmax, Qavg, VV, time to Qmax, and flow time, as well as age, sex, height, and weight were recorded. Of the 440 children, around 300 (68.18%) children could produce a normal flow rate at VV of more than 50 mL. Of the remaining 140 (31.82%) children, 50.00% voided less than 50 mL, and remaining 50.00% had abnormal voiding pattern, staccato or interrupted (21.43% each) and plateau or tower shaped (3.57% each). Cases were divided into two age groups (5-9 years and 10-15 years), and uroflowmetric analysis was done between boys and girls in both age groups to derive nomograms of Qavg and Qmax. Results: Qmax and Qavg flow nomograms were plotted for boys and girls. Mean Qmax for boys was 16.68 mL/s and for girls 20.69 mL/s. The mean Qavg values were 11.04 mL/s and 8.60 mL/s for girls and boys, respectively. The Qmax and Qavg values were higher in girls. There were significant increases in flow rates with increasing age, body surface area, and VV in both sexes. Conclusions: Nomograms for Qmax and Qavg may be a useful tool in evaluation of lower urinary tract disturbances in children.
|
Received: 28 September 2020
Available online: 20 April 2022
|
Corresponding Authors:
Abhay D. Mahajan
E-mail: drabhaymahajan@gmail.com
|
|
|
Uroflow pattern | Frequency, n | Percentage (%) | Normal flow rate | 300 | 68.18 | Abnormal flow rate | 140 | 31.82 | Voided volume <50 mL | 70 | 50.00 | Staccato | 30 | 21.43 | Interrupted | 30 | 21.43 | Plateau | 5 | 3.57 | Tower | 5 | 3.57 |
|
Distribution of uroflow pattern in all the evaluated children.
|
Variable | Boy, n (%) | Girl, n (%) | Total, n (%) | Voided volume <50 mL | 5-9 years | 30 (71.43) | 20 (71.43) | 50 (71.43) | 10-15 years | 12 (28.57) | 8 (28.57) | 20 (28.57) | Staccato pattern | 5-9 years | 14 (66.67) | 6 (66.67) | 20 (66.67) | 10-15 years | 7 (33.33) | 3 (33.33) | 10 (33.33) | Interrupted | 5-9 years | 13 (59.09) | 7 (87.50) | 20 (66.67) | 10-15 years | 9 (40.91) | 1 (12.50) | 10 (33.33) | Plateau | 5-9 years | 2 (66.67) | 1 (50.00) | 3 (60.00) | 10-15 years | 1 (33.33) | 1 (50.00) | 2 (40.00) | Tower pattern of voiding | 5-9 years | 1 (100.00) | 3 (75.00) | 4 (80.00) | 10-15 years | 0 (0.00) | 1 (25.00) | 1 (20.00) |
|
Distribution of excluded children according to sex and age.
|
Uroflowmetry parameter | Boy | Girl | p-Value | Qmaxa, mL/s | 16.68±4.48 | 20.69±5.08 | <0.0001 | Qavga, mL/s | 8.60±2.29 | 11.04±2.72 | <0.0001 | VVa, mL | 137.68±64.66 | 154.43±97.51 | 0.55 | Time to Qmaxa, s | 5.78±2.20 | 5.50±1.88 | 0.23 | Flow timea, s | 13.03±4.38 | 13.31±7.50 | 0.062 |
|
Mean uroflowmetry parameters by gender.
|
Uroflowmetry parameter | Aged 5-9 years | Aged 10-15 years | Boys | Girls | p-Value | Boys | Girls | p-Value | Qmaxa, mL/s | 15.12±4.09 | 19.34±3.48 | <0.0001 | 19.06±4.01 | 23.57±4.45 | <0.0001 | Qavga, mL/s | 8.05±2.06 | 10.25±1.52 | <0.0001 | 9.43±2.38 | 11.64±3.31 | <0.0001 | VVa, mL | 135.32±70.71 | 116.21±49.24 | 0.272 | 141.27±54.46 | 187.35±115.6 | 0.058 | Time to Qmaxa, s | 5.47±2.14 | 4.88±1.64 | 0.037 | 6.25±2.22 | 6.03±1.92 | 0.645 | Flow timea, s | 13.14±4.59 | 11.98±4.94 | 0.017 | 12.87±4.06 | 14.45±9.03 | 0.453 |
|
Mean uroflowmetry parameters according to age groups and sexes.
|
|
Correlations of Qmax and Qavg with age and BSA in girls. (A) Correlation of Qmax with age; (B) Correlation of Qavg with age; (C) Correlation of Qmax with BSA; (D) Correlation of Qavg with BSA. Qmax, maximum flow rate; Qavg, average flow rate; BSA, body surface area.
|
|
Correlations of Qmax and Qavg with age and body surface area in boys. (A) Correlation of Qmax with age; (B) Correlation of Qavg with age; (C) Correlation of Qmax with BSA; (D) Correlation of Qavg with BSA. Qmax, maximum flow rate; Qavg, average flow rate; BSA, body surface area.
|
|
Nomograms for Qmax and Qavg in girls aged 5-15 years. (A) Nomogram for Qmax rate in girls age 5-15 years; (B) Nomogram for Qavg in girls aged 5-15 years. The quintile regression method was used to establish the percentile levels (5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th). Qmax, maximum flow rate; Qavg, average flow rate; VV, voided volume.
|
|
Nomograms for Qmax and Qavg in boys aged 5-15 years. (A) Nomogram for Qmax flow rate in boys aged 5-15 years; (B) Nomogram for Qavg in boys aged 5-15 years. The quintile regression method was used to establish the percentile levels (5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th). Qmax, maximum flow rate; Qavg, average flow rate; VV, voided volume.
|
[1] |
Neveus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P, Hjalmas K, Bauer S, Bower W, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: Report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol 2006; 176: 314-24.
|
[2] |
Sibarani J, Siregar S, Stanzah H, Bilommi R. Determination of uroflowmetry nomograms in healthy Indonesian children aged 5 to 15 years old in Hasan Sadikin hospital, Bandung. Med Surg Urol 2016; 6:179. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9857.1000179.
|
[3] |
Siroky MB, Olessen CA, Krane RJ. The flow rate nomogram in development. J Urol 1979; 122:665-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56550-7
pmid: 159366
|
[4] |
Kumar V, Dhabalia JV, Nelivigi GG, Punia MS, Suryavanshi M. Age, gender, and voided volume dependency of peak urinary flow rate and uroflowmetry nomogram in the Indian population. Indian J Urol 2009; 25:461-6.
doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.57912
|
[5] |
Kaefer M, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB, Retik AB, Peters AC, Antalia A, et al. Estimating normal bladder capacity in children. J Urol 1997; 158:2261-4.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68230-2
pmid: 9366371
|
[6] |
Yang SS, Chiang IN, Chang SJ. Interpretation of uroflowmetry and post-void residual urine in Children: Fundamental approach to pediatric non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction. Incont Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2012; 6:9-12.
|
[7] |
Kaufman JJ. A new recording uroflowmeter: A simple automatic device for measuring voiding velocity. J Urol 1957; 78: 97-9.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66405-X
|
[8] |
Farhane S, Saidi R, Fredj N, Taufahii M, Lefi M, Saad H. Uroflowmetry in children: Prospective study of normal parameters. Prog Urol 2006; 16:598-601.
pmid: 17175959
|
[9] |
Scott R, McIlhaney JS. The voiding rates in normal male children. J Urol 1959; 82:224-30.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)65864-6
|
[10] |
Kajbafzadeh AM, Yazdi CA, Rouhi O, Tajik P, Mohseni P. Uroflowmetry nomogram in Iranian children aged 7 to 14 years. BMC Urol 2005; 5:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-5-3.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-5-3
|
[11] |
Gutierrez Segura C. Urine flow in childhood: A study of flow chart parameters based on 1,361 uroflowmetry tests. J Urol 1997; 157:1426-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65010-9
pmid: 9120971
|
[12] |
Jensen KM, Nielsen KK, Jensen H, Pedersen OS, Krarup T. Urinary flow studies in normal kindergarten and schoolchildren. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1983; 17:11-21.
pmid: 6223363
|
[13] |
Gupta DK, Sankhwar SN, Goel A. Uroflowmetry nomograms for healthy children 5 to 15 years old. J Urol 2013; 190:1008-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.073
|
[14] |
Gierup J. Micturition studies in infants and children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1970; 4:191-207.
pmid: 5518248
|
[15] |
Churchill BM, Gilmour RF, Urodynamics Williot P. Ped Clin North Am 1987; 345:1133-57.
|
[16] |
Szabo L, Fegyverneki S. Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal childrendthe Miskolc nomograms. Br J Urol 1995; 76:16-20.
pmid: 7648059
|
[17] |
Yang SS, Chiang IN, Hsieh CH, Chang SJ. The Tzu Chi nomograms for maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) in children: Comparison with Miskolc nomogram. BJU Int 2014; 113:492-7.
doi: 10.1111/bju.12425
|
[18] |
Howard D, Delancey JO, Tunn R, Ashton-Miller JA. Racial differences in the structure and function of stress urinary continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:713-7.
doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00786-9
pmid: 10775735
|
[19] |
Hoebeke P, Bower W, Combs A, De Jong T, Yong S. Diagnostic evaluation of children with daytime incontinence. J Urol 2010; 183:699-703.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.038
pmid: 20022025
|
[20] |
Mattsson S, Gladh G, Lingstrorm S. Relative filling of the bladder at daytime voids in healthy school children. J Urol 2003; 170:1343-6.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086552.49727.a9
pmid: 14501766
|
[1] |
Ali Reza Nateghian,Sina Karaji,Khosrow Zamani. A decade of trends in the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of prevalent uropathogens among pediatric patients from Tehran, Iran during 2005-2016[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(3): 253-259. |
[2] |
Olivier Rouviere,Paul Cezar Moldovan. The current role of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(2): 137-145. |
[3] |
Jennifer Bjazevic,Hassan Razvi*. Stones in pregnancy and pediatrics[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 223-234. |
[4] |
Adam Howe, Zachary Kozel, Lane Palmer. Robotic surgery in pediatric urology[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(1): 55-67. |
[5] |
Rajeev Thekumpadam Puthenveetil, Debajit Baishya, Sasanka Barua, Debanga Sarma. Implication of ultrasound bladder parameters on treatment response in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia under medical management[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2015, 2(4): 233-237. |
|
|
|
|