Please wait a minute...
Search Asian J Urol Advanced Search
Share 
Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 546-554    doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.007
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital venous thromboembolism in non-oncological urological inpatients: A single center experience
Zhao Wanga,Kaixuan Lia,Quan Zhua,Haozhen Lia,Ziqiang Wua,Xuesong Liua,Zhengyan Tangab*()
aDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
bProvincial Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Genitourinary System Disease, Changsha, China
下载:  HTML  PDF (484KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract: 

Objective: To determine incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development of in-hospital VTE in urological inpatients who underwent non-oncological surgery in a tertiary hospital in China.

Methods: Consecutive 1453 inpatients who were admitted to a non-oncological urological ward in the tertiary hospital from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were enrolled in the study, and the VTE events were diagnosed by ultrasound or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Patients’ occurrence of VTE and characteristics which may contribute to the development of VTE were collected and analyzed as incidence and risk factors.

Results: The incidence of VTE in non-oncological urological inpatients is 2.3%. In our cohort, patients who experienced previous VTE (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 14.272, 95% CI 3.620-56.275), taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents before admission (aOR 10.181, 95% CI 2.453-42.256), D-dimer (max) ≥1 μg/mL (aOR 22.456, 95% CI 6.468-77.967), lower extremity swelling (aOR 10.264, 95% CI 2.242-46.994), chest symptoms (aOR 79.182, 95% CI 7.132-879.076), operation time of more than or equal to 180 min (aOR 10.690, 95% CI 1.356-84.300), and Caprini score (max) of more than or equal to 5 (aOR 34.241, 95% CI 1.831-640.235) were considered as risk factors for VTE.

Conclusion: In this study, we found that the incidence of VTE in non-oncological surgery was about 2.3%, which was higher than some previous studies. Risk factors could be used for early detection and diagnosis of VTE.

Key words:  Venous thromboembolism    Non-oncological surgery    Urological inpatient    Incidence    Risk factor
收稿日期:  2021-03-16      修回日期:  2021-07-19      接受日期:  2021-09-07      出版日期:  2023-10-20      发布日期:  2023-11-13      整期出版日期:  2023-10-20
引用本文:    
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 546-554.
Zhao Wang, Kaixuan Li, Quan Zhu, Haozhen Li, Ziqiang Wu, Xuesong Liu, Zhengyan Tang. Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital venous thromboembolism in non-oncological urological inpatients: A single center experience. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 546-554.
链接本文:  
http://www.ajurology.com/CN/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.007  或          http://www.ajurology.com/CN/Y2023/V10/I4/546
Characteristic Patient, n (%) Median±SD VTE Univariate analysis Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
n (%) Incidence, %
Total 1453 (100.0) 34 (100.0) 2.3
Gender χ2=0.332; p=0.565
Male 923 (63.5) - 20 (58.8) 2.2 1
Female 530 (36.5) - 14 (41.2) 2.6 1.23 (0.61-2.45)
Age, year 52.3±14.9 χ2=21.283; p=0.000 3.33 (1.87-5.92)a
≤40 319 (22.0) 30.6±6.4 2 (5.9) 0.6 1
41-65 846 (58.2) 53.6±6.4 15 (44.1) 1.8 2.86 (0.65-12.58)
≥66 288 (19.8) 72.4±5.8 17 (50.0) 5.9 9.94 (2.28-43.42)a
BMI, kg/m2 23.2±3.3 p=0.119b
18.5-23.9 726 (50.0) 21.6±1.5 19 (55.9) 2.6 1
<18.5 105 (7.2) 17.3±0.9 3 (8.8) 2.9 1.09 (0.32-3.76)
24-26.9 373 (25.7) 25.7±0.9 7 (20.6) 1.9 0.71 (0.30-1.71)
27-29.9 136 (9.4) 28.1±0.8 0 (0.0) 0 -
≥30 42 (2.9) 31.4±1.8 1 (2.9) 2.4 0.91 (0.12-6.95)
Missing value 71 (4.9) - 4 (11.8) 5.6 2.22 (0.73-6.72)
  
Characteristic Patients, n (%) VTE Univariate analysis Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
n (%) Incidence, %
Emergency surgery p=0.240a
No 1413 (97.2) 32 (94.1) 2.3 1
Yes 40 (2.8) 2 (5.9) 5.0 2.27 (0.53-9.82)
Hypertension χ2=1.407; p=0.235
No 1069 (73.6) 22 (64.7) 2.1 1
Yes 384 (26.4) 12 (35.3) 3.1 1.54 (0.75-3.13)
Heart failure p=1.000a
No 1452 (99.9) 34 (100.0) 2.3
Yes 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 0
CHD p=1.000a
No 1380 (95.0) 33 (97.1) 2.4 1
Yes 73 (5.0) 1 (2.9) 1.4 0.57 (0.08-4.20)
Other cardiovascular diseases p=0.222a
No 1415 (97.4) 32 (94.1) 2.3 1
Yes 38 (2.6) 2 (5.9) 5.3 2.40 (0.55-10.41)
DM p=0.207a
No 1328 (91.4) 29 (85.3) 2.2 1
Yes 125 (8.6) 5 (14.7) 4.0 1.87 (0.71-4.91)
Previous VTE p=0.000a
No 1425 (98.1) 27 (79.4) 1.9 1
Yes 28 (1.9) 7 (20.6) 25.0 17.26 (6.77-44.02)b
Family history of thrombosis p=1.000a
No 1383 (95.2) 33 (97.1) 2.4 1
Yes 70 (4.8) 1 (2.9) 1.4 0.59 (0.08-4.40)
History of varicose veins in the lower extremities p=0.064a
No 1413 (97.2) 31 (91.2) 2.2 1
Yes 40 (2.8) 3 (8.8) 7.5 3.62 (1.06-12.36)b
History of surgery within 1 month p=0.017a
No 1409 (97.0) 30 (88.2) 2.1 1
Yes 44 (3.0) 4 (11.8) 9.1 4.60 (1.55-13.67)b
Anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents before admission p=0.000a
No 1431 (98.5) 27 (79.4) 1.9 1
Yes 22 (1.5) 7 (20.6) 31.8 24.27 (9.16-64.31)b
COPD p=0.248a
No 1441 (99.2) 33 (97.1) 2.3 1
Yes 12 (0.8) 1 (2.9) 8.3 3.88 (0.49-30.92)
Cancer history p=0.500a
No 1424 (98.0) 33 (97.1) 2.3 1
Yes 29 (2.0) 1 (2.9) 3.4 1.51 (0.20-11.40)
Cerebral stroke p=0.205a
No 1417 (97.5) 32 (94.1) 2.3 1
Yes 36 (2.5) 2 (5.9) 5.6 2.55 (0.59-11.06)
D-dimer, max, μg/mL p=0.000a 5.42 (3.31-8.87)b
<0.5 1048 (72.1) 4 (11.8) 0.4 1
0.5-1 160 (11.0) 4 (11.8) 2.5 6.69 (1.66-27.03)b
≥1 245 (16.9) 26 (76.5) 10.6 30.99 (10.71-89.68)b
Caprini score, max p=0.000a 1.60 (1.34-1.91)b
≤2 94 (6.5) 1 (2.9) 1.1 1
3-4 747 (51.4) 7 (20.6) 0.9 0.88 (0.11-7.23)
≥5 612 (42.1) 26 (76.5) 4.2 4.13 (0.55-30.77)
Lower extremity swelling p=0.000a
No 1438 (99.0) 28 (82.4) 1.9 1
Yes 15 (1.0) 6 (17.6) 40.0 33.57 (11.19-100.72)b
Lower extremity pain p=0.069a
No 1450 (99.8) 33 (97.1) 2.3 1
Yes 3 (0.2) 1 (2.9) 33.3 21.47 (1.90-242.69)b
Chest symptoms p=0.000a
No 1445 (99.4) 29 (85.3) 2.0 1
Yes 8 (0.6) 5 (14.7) 62.5 81.38 (18.57-356.72)b
  
Characteristic Patients, n (%) VTE Univariate analysis, p-valuea Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
n (%) Incidence, %
Preoperative bleeding 0.003
No 1427 (98.2) 30 (88.2) 2.1 1
Yes 26 (1.8) 4 (11.8) 15.4 8.47 (2.75-26.08)b
Preoperative sepsis 0.015
No 1430 (98.4) 31 (91.2) 2.2 1
Yes 23 (1.6) 3 (8.8) 13.0 6.77 (1.91-23.98)b
ASA score 0.000 2.61 (1.34-5.10)b
1-2 791 (59.0) 7 (31.8) 0.9 1
3 510 (38.1) 13 (59.1) 2.5 2.93 (1.16-7.39)b
4 39 (2.9) 2 (9.1) 5.1 6.05 (1.22-30.16)b
Missing 113 (7.8) 12 (35.3) 10.6 13.31 (5.12-34.58)b
Operation time, min 0.000 2.49 (1.17-5.31)b
<60 553 (41.3) 4 (18.2) 0.7 1
60-179 735 (54.9) 16 (72.7) 2.2 3.05 (1.02-9.19)b
≥180 52 (3.9) 2 (9.1) 3.8 5.49 (0.98-30.72)
Missing 113 (7.8) 12 (35.3) 10.6 16.31 (5.16-51.57)b
Blood loss, mL 0.000
<100 1191 (82.0) 18 (52.9) 1.5 1
100-400 124 (8.5) 4 (11.8) 3.2 2.17 (0.72-6.62)
>400 25 (1.7) 0 (0.0) 0.0 -
Missing 113 (7.8) 12 (35.3) 10.6 7.74 (3.63-16.53)b
Re-admission surgery 0.379
No 1433 (98.6) 33 (97.1) 2.3 1
Yes 20 (1.4) 1 (2.9) 5.0 2.23 (0.29-17.18)
Complications 0.000
No 1395 (96.0) 25 (73.5) 1.8 1
Yes 58 (4.0) 9 (26.5) 15.5 10.07 (4.46-22.70)b
  
Variable aOR 95% CI p-Value
Age, year
41-65 4.397 0.408-47.357 0.222
≥66 5.332 0.415-68.519 0.199
Previous VTE 17.056a 3.902-74.558 0.000
History of varicose veins in the lower extremities 1.598 0.238-9.032 0.596
History of surgery within 1 month 1.436 0.260-7.947 0.678
Anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents before admission 8.137a 1.821-36.363 0.006
Preoperative bleeding 0.878 0.090-8.580 0.911
Preoperative sepsis 3.365 0.450-25.184 0.237
D-dimer, max, μg/mL
0.5-1 2.171 0.379-12.424 0.384
≥1 17.578a 4.627-66.775 0.000
Caprini score, max
3-4 13.131 0.587-293.783 0.104
≥5 18.579 0.939-367.682 0.055
Complications 2.504 0.698-8.978 0.159
Lower extremity swelling 9.188a 1.620-52.112 0.012
Lower extremity pain 14.975 0.058-3898.037 0.340
Chest symptoms 72.939a 6.146-865.597 0.001
ASA score
3 1.440 0.424-4.898 0.559
4 0.781 0.090-6.747 0.822
Operation time, min
60-179 3.250 0.891-11.850 0.074
≥180 17.466a 1.952-156.253 0.011
Blood loss, mL
100-400 0.785 0.170-3.631 0.756
>400 0.000 0.000 0.998
  
Variable aOR 95% CI p-Value
Previous VTE 14.272a 3.620-56.275 0.000
Anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents before admission 10.181a 2.453-42.256 0.001
D-dimer, max, μg/mL
0.5-1 2.545 0.452-14.318 0.289
≥1 22.456a 6.468-77.967 0.000
Caprini score, max
3-4 16.590 0.791-347.775 0.070
≥5 34.241a 1.831-640.235 0.018
Lower extremity swelling 10.264a 2.242-46.994 0.003
Chest symptoms 79.182a 7.132-879.076 0.000
Operation time, min 0.068
60-179 2.920 0.837-10.183 0.093
≥180 10.690a 1.356-84.300 0.025
  
Study Country Non-oncological urological surgeries No. of patients No. of VTE Incidence, %
Turna et al., 2008 [12] United States RIRS and Ho:YAG lithotripsy 74 1 1.4
Sofer et al., 2010 [13] Israel PCNL 200 1 0.5
Singh et al., 2005 [14] Canada Kidney transplantation 68 5 7.4
Kusyk et al., 2005 [15] United States Kidney transplantation 326 2 0.6
Montgomery et al., 2005 [16] United States Kidney transplantation 122 1 0.8
Giron et al., 2008 [17] United States Kidney transplantation 85 1 1.2
Wadstr?m et al., 2011 [18] Sweden Kidney transplantation 413 4 1
O'Brien et al., 2012 [19] United Kingdom Kidney transplantation 383 1 0.3
Meriwether et al., 2013 [20] United States Prolapse surgery 52 1 1.9
Mueller et al., 2014 [21] United States Reconstructive pelvic surgery 33 710 95 0.3
Gordon et al., 2005 [22] Israel Reconstructive pelvic surgery 460 3 0.7
Mamoulakis et al., 2011 [23] Greece TURP 198 1 0.5
  
[1] Chen E, Papa N, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D, Sengupta S. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism after pelvic uro-oncologic surgeryda single center experience. BJU Int 2016; 117(Suppl. 4):50 https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13238.
doi: 10.1111/bju.2016.117.issue-S4
[2] Liu J, Zhao J, Yan Y, Su J. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the prevention of thrombosis following total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e14539. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014539.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014539
[3] Lu X, Lin J. Low molecular weight heparin versus other antithrombotic agents for prevention of venous thromboembolic events after total hip or total knee replacement surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC musculoskelet disord 2018; 19:322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2215-3.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2215-3
[4] Klaassen Z, Wallis C, Lavallée L, Violette P. Perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in prostate cancer surgery. World J Urol 2020; 38:593-600.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02705-x pmid: 30840115
[5] Caprini JA. Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Dis Mon 2005; 51:70-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2005.02.003
[6] Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, Cooper J, Paterno M, Soukonnikov B, et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:969-77.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041533
[7] Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, Ferrari A, Brandolin B, Perlati M, et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8:2450-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04044.x pmid: 20738765
[8] Wells P, Anderson D, Rodger M, Ginsberg J, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83:416-20.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1613830
[9] Liu X, Liu C, Chen X, Wu W, Lu G. Comparison between Caprini and Padua risk assessment models for hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: a retrospective study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 23:538-43.
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw158
[10] Tikkinen KAO, Cartwright R, Gould MK, Naspro R, Novara G, Sandset PM, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in urological surgery. https://uroweb.org/guideline/thromboprophylaxis/. [Accessed March 2017].
[11] Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:801-10.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 pmid: 26903338
[12] Turna B, Stein R, Smaldone M, Santos B, Kefer J, Jackman S, et al. Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium:YAG lithotripsy for intrarenal stones in anticoagulated cases. J Urol 2008; 179:1415-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.076 pmid: 18289567
[13] Sofer M, Lidawi G, Keren-Paz G, Yehiely R, Beri A, Matzkin H. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: first 200 cases in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2010; 12:164-7.
pmid: 20684181
[14] Singh D, Lawen J, Alkhudair W. Does pretransplant obesity affect the outcome in kidney transplant recipients? Transplant Proc 2005; 37:717-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.033
[15] Kusyk T, Verran D, Stewart G, Ryan B, Fisher J, Tsacalos K, et al. Increased risk of hemorrhagic complications in renal allograft recipients receiving systemic heparin early posttransplantation. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:1026-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.02.018
[16] Montgomery J, Wolf J. Venous thrombosis prophylaxis for urological laparoscopy: fractionated heparin versus sequential compression devices. J Urol 2005; 173:1623-6.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154635.22551.23 pmid: 15821517
[17] Giron F, Baez Y, Ni?o-Murcia A, Rodríguez J, Salcedo S. Use of nonabsorbable polymer ligaclip in hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for living donor. Transplant Proc 2008;40:682-4.
[18] Wadstr?m J, Biglarnia A, Gjertsen H, Sugitani A, Fronek J. Introducing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: learning curves and development based on 413 consecutive cases in four centers. Transplantation 2011;91:462-9.
[19] O’Brien B, Mastoridis S, Sabharwal A, Hakim N, Taube D, Papalois V. Expanding the donor pool: living donor nephrectomy in the elderly and the overweight. Transplantation 2012; 93:1158-65.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31824ef1ae
[20] Meriwether K, Antosh D, Knoepp L, Chen C, Mete M, Gutman R. Increased morbidity in combined abdominal sacrocolpopexy and abdominoplasty procedures. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24:385-91.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1857-1 pmid: 22814931
[21] Mueller M, Pilecki M, Catanzarite T, Jain U, Kim J, Kenton K. Venous thromboembolism in reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.031.
[22] Gordon D, Gold R, Pauzner D, Lessing J, Groutz A. Tensionfree vaginal tape in the elderly: is it a safe procedure? Urology 2005; 65:479-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.059 pmid: 15780359
[23] Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S, Christoulakis I, Sofras F. The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 2011; 29:205-10.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0566-y pmid: 20461386
[24] Tikkinen K, Craigie S, Agarwal A, Siemieniuk R, Cartwright R, Violette P, et al. Procedure-specific risks of thrombosis and bleeding in urological non-cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2018; 73:236-41.
doi: S0302-2838(17)30114-8 pmid: 28284738
[25] Jordan B, Matulewicz R, Trihn B, Kundu S. Venous thromboembolism after nephrectomy: incidence, timing and associated risk factors from a national multi-institutional database. World J Urol 2017; 35:1713-9.
[26] Tyson M, Castle E, Humphreys M, Andrews P. Venous thromboembolism after urological surgery. J Urol 2014; 192: 793-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.092 pmid: 24594402
[27] Bekelis K, Labropoulos N, Coy S. Risk of venous thromboembolism and operative duration in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Neurosurgery 2017; 80:787-92.
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw129 pmid: 28327952
[28] Lodders J, Parmar S, Stienen N, Martin T, Karagozoglu K, Heymans M, et al. Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in oncological oral and maxillofacial operations: retrospective analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53: 244-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.12.001 pmid: 25640701
[29] ShiA, Huang J, Wang X, Li M, Zhang J, ChenY, et al. Postoperative D-dimer predicts venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing urologic tumor surgery. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:e15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.003.
[30] McAlpine K, Breau R, Mallick R, Cnossen S, Cagiannos I, Morash C, et al. Current guidelines do not sufficiently discriminate venous thromboembolism risk in urology. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.01.015.
[31] Kukreja J, Levey H, Scosyrev E, Kiernan M, Berrondo C, McNamee C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of extendedduration prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in major urologic oncology surgery. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:e7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.12.010.
[32] Pedersen M, Wahlsten L, Gr?nborg H, Gislason G, Petersen M, Bonde A. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism after Achilles tendon rupture: a nationwide Danish cohort study of 28 546 patients with Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47:3229-37.
doi: 10.1177/0363546519876054 pmid: 31574237
[33] Kahr H, Christiansen O, H?gdall C, Grove A, Mortensen R, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Endometrial cancer does not increase the 30-day risk of venous thromboembolism following hysterectomy compared to benign disease. A Danish national cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2019;155:112-8.
[34] Stein P, Beemath A, Olson R. Obesity as a risk factor in venous thromboembolism. Am J Med 2005; 118:978-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.03.012 pmid: 16164883
[35] Saluja M, Gilling P. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in urology: a review. Int J Urol 2017; 24:589-93.
doi: 10.1111/iju.13399 pmid: 28741745
No related articles found!
[1] Ponco Birowo,Nur Rasyid,Chaidir A. Mochtar,Bambang S. Noegroho,H.R. Danarto,Besut Daryanto,Lukman Hakim,Dyandra Parikesit,Fakhri Rahman,S. Cahyo Ariwicaksono. Daily activities and training experiences of urology residents during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Indonesia: A nationwide survey[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(2): 119 -127 .
[2] Saeed R. Khan,Benjamin K. Canales. Proposal for pathogenesis-based treatment options to reduce calcium oxalate stone recurrence[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 246 -257 .
[3] Guohua Zeng,Wei Zhu. Urolithiasis: From pathogenesis to management (part one)[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 213 -214 .
[4] Rasim Güzel,Ümit Yildirim,Kemal Sarica. Contemporary minimal invasive surgical management of stones in children[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 239 -245 .
[5] Lazaros Tzelves,Patrick Juliebø-Jones,Ioannis Manolitsis,Themistoklis Bellos,Ioannis Mykoniatis,Marinos Berdempes,Titos Markopoulos,Michael Lardas,Belthangady M. Zeeshan Hameed,Panagiotis Angelopoulos,Amelia Pietropaolo,Bhaskar Somani,Ioannis Varkarakis,Andreas Skolarikos. Radiation protection measures during endourological therapies[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 215 -225 .
[6] Giorgio Mazzon,Simon Choong,Antonio Celia. Stone-scoring systems for predicting complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review of the literature[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 226 -238 .
[7] Anastasios Anastasiadis,Antonios Koudonas,Georgios Langas,Stavros Tsiakaras,Dimitrios Memmos,Ioannis Mykoniatis,Evangelos N. Symeonidis,Dimitrios Tsiptsios,Eliophotos Savvides,Ioannis Vakalopoulos,Georgios Dimitriadis,Jean de la Rosette. Transforming urinary stone disease management by artificial intelligence-based methods: A comprehensive review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 258 -274 .
[8] Reza Mehrazin, Shirin Razdan. Utility of three-dimensional virtual reconstruction for robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy using the IRIS[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 388 -389 .
[9] Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Clara Cerrato, Zhenjie Wu, Antonio Franco, Francesco Del Giudice, Alessandro Sciarra, Paolo Verze, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Ciro Imbimbo, Sisto Perdonà, Edward E. Cherullo, Francesco Porpiglia, Ithaar H. Derweesh, Riccardo Autorino. A systematic review of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes for advanced indications: Large tumors (cT2-T3), solitary kidney, completely endophytic, hilar, recurrent, and multiple renal tumors[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 390 -406 .
[10] Enrico Checcucci, Alberto Piana, Gabriele Volpi, Pietro Piazzolla, Daniele Amparore, Sabrina De Cillis, Federico Piramide, Cecilia Gatti, Ilaria Stura, Enrico Bollito, Federica Massa, Michele Di Dio, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia. Three-dimensional automatic artificial intelligence driven augmented-reality selective biopsy during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A feasibility and accuracy study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 407 -415 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed