Please wait a minute...
Search Asian J Urol Advanced Search
Share 
Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 534-540    doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.007
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
Prospective observational study on the prognosis of ureteral lesions caused by impacted stones via dual-energy spectral computed tomography
Junjie Wanga,Ximing Wangb,Haozhou Zhongc,Wengui Xiec,Qilin Xic*()
aDepartment of Urology, The Sixth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
bDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
cDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
下载:  HTML  PDF (4696KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract: 

Objective: Ureteral lesions caused by impacted ureteral stones are likely to result in postoperative ureteral stricture. On this basis, the study aimed to investigate if dual-energy spectral computed tomography can predict ureteral hardening caused by impacted stones and to explore the relationship between different types of ureteral lesions and the risk of ureteral stricture.

Methods: This prospective study collected data of 93 patients with impacted stones from hospital automation system during January 2018 to October 2019. They underwent an abdominal scan on a dual-energy spectral computed tomography. During surgery, the operator used ureteroscopy to identify ureteral lesions, which were classified into four categories: edema, polyps, pallor, and hardening. Seven months later, 90 patients were reviewed for the degree of hydronephrosis.

Results: Endoscopic observations revealed 38 (41%) cases of ureteral edema, 20 (22%) cases of polyps, 13 (14%) cases of pallor, and 22 (24%) cases of hardening. There were significant differences in hydronephrosis, the period of impaction, the calcium concentration of the ureter, and the slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve between the four groups. After that, we evaluated the factors associated with ureteral hardening and found that the calcium concentration of the ureter and hydronephrosis remained independent predictors of ureteral hardening. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that 5.3 mg/cm³ calcium concentration of the ureter is an optimal cut-off value to predict ureteral hardening. The result of follow-up showed that 80 patients had complete remission of hydronephrosis, with a complete remission rate of 61.9% (13/21) in the hardening group and 97.1% (67/69) in the non-hardening group (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Calcium concentration of the ureter is an independent predictor of ureteral hardening. Patients with ureteral hardening have more severe hydronephrosis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy. When the calcium concentration of the ureter is less than 5.3 mg/cm³, ureteral lesions should be actively treated.

Key words:  Ureteral lesions    Impacted ureteral stone    Dual-energy spectral computed tomography    Ureteral stricture    Ureteroscopic lithotripsy
收稿日期:  2021-06-03      修回日期:  2021-10-29      接受日期:  2022-05-09      出版日期:  2023-10-20      发布日期:  2023-11-13      整期出版日期:  2023-10-20
引用本文:    
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 534-540.
Junjie Wang, Ximing Wang, Haozhou Zhong, Wengui Xie, Qilin Xi. Prospective observational study on the prognosis of ureteral lesions caused by impacted stones via dual-energy spectral computed tomography. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 534-540.
链接本文:  
http://www.ajurology.com/CN/10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.007  或          http://www.ajurology.com/CN/Y2023/V10/I4/534
  
  
Characteristic Hardening Pallor Polyps Edema p-Value
Patient, n 22 13 20 38 NA
Mean age, year 56 58 48 50 0.105
Sex, n 0.373
Female 11 4 6 11
Male 11 9 14 27
Site of impaction, n 0.06
Lower ureter 1 1 6 14
Middle ureter 5 2 1 5
Upper ureter 16 10 13 19
Stone sizea,b, mm 13.6±3.7 13.7±5.9 13.0±5.9 11.7±4.4 0.178
Hydronephrosisa, mm 38.9±15.1 36.4±14.3 28.3±8.9 24.5±8.5 <0.001c
Duration of symptomsa, month 3.4±5.8 4.6±5.0 2.9±4.3 1.3±2.4 0.037c
Stone diametera, mm 9.6±2.3 9.9±3.8 9.4±3.2 8.1±3.1 0.152
Ureteral wall thicknessa, mm 8.1±3.2 8.8±3.1 9.5±3.6 8.1±2.4 0.629
Spectral CT
Calcium concentrationa, mg/cm3 3.7±3.4 6.1±2.8 8.5±2.7 8.2±3.1 <0.001c
Water concentrationa, mg/cm3 1007.3±21.6 1009.6±11.5 1019.0±15.0 1013.3±13.8 0.214
Effective-Za 7.8±0.3 7.9±0.1 8.0±0.2 8.0±0.3 0.114
λHUa 0.8±0.6 1.0±0.6 1.4±0.6 1.4±0.5 0.038c
  
Variablea p-Value
Hydronephrosis
Hardening vs. edema <0.001b
Pallor vs. edema 0.018b
Calcium concentration
Hardening vs. edema <0.001b
Hardening vs. polyps <0.001b
Rate of curve
Hardening vs. polyps 0.038b
Hardening vs. edema 0.017b
Duration of impaction
Pallor vs. edema 0.037b
  
Variable OR (95% CI) p-Value
Hydronephrosis, cm 1.063 (1.012-1.115) 0.014a
Duration of symptoms, month 1.088 (0.923-1.282) 0.314
Calcium concentration, mg/cm3 0.595 (0.432-0.820) 0.001a
λHU 1.642 (0.364-7.414) 0.378
  
  
Group Calcium concentration
<5.3 mg/cm3 ≥5.3 mg/cm3
Hardening, n 18 4
Pallor, n 4 9
Polyps, n 2 18
Edema, n 3 35
  
[1] Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 2017; 35:1301-20.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6 pmid: 28213860
[2] Wang W, Fan J, Huang G, Li J, Zhu X, Tian Y, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in mainland China: a systematic review. Sci Rep 2017; 7:41630.
doi: 10.1038/srep41630 pmid: 28139722
[3] Legemate JD, Wijnstok NJ, Matsuda T, Strijbos W, Erdogru T, Roth B, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones. World J Urol 2017; 35:1497-506.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2028-2 pmid: 28321499
[4] Darwish AE, Gadelmoula MM, Abdelkawi IF, Abdellatif AM, Abdel-Moneim AM, Hammouda HM. Ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy for stones: a prospective study for the incidence and risk factors. Urol Ann 2019; 11:276-81.
doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_110_18 pmid: 31413506
[5] ?zbir S, Can O, Atalay HA, Canat HL, ?ak?r SS, ?tün?temur A. Formula for predicting the impaction of ureteral stones. Urolithiasis 2020;48:353-60.
[6] Mugiya S, Ito T, Maruyama S, Hadano S, Nagae H. Endoscopic features of impacted ureteral stones. J Urol 2004; 171:89-91.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100960.08768.81 pmid: 14665851
[7] Tas S, Tugcu V, Mutlu B, Karadag S, Bitkin A, Yucel M, et al. Incidence of ureteral stricture after ureterorenoscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2011; 83:141-6.
[8] El-Abd AS, Suliman MG, Abo Farha MO, Ramadan AR, El-Tatawy HH, El-Gamal OM, et al. The development of ureteric strictures after ureteroscopic treatment for ureteric calculi: a long-term study at two academic centres. Arab J Urol 2014; 12: 168-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.11.004
[9] Brito AH, Mitre AI, Srougi M. Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy of impacted ureteral calculi. Int Braz J Urol 2006; 32:295-9.
pmid: 16813672
[10] Aldoukhi AH, Ghani KR, Hall TL, Roberts WW. Thermal response to high-power holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 2017; 31:1308-12.
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0679 pmid: 29048216
[11] Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Shen Y, Ishikawa T, Tate E, et al. Dual-energy spectral CT: various clinical vascular applications. Radiographics 2016; 36:1215-32.
doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150185 pmid: 27399244
[12] McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG. Dual- and multienergy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology 2015; 276:637-53.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142631 pmid: 26302388
[13] Fam XI, Singam P, Ho CC, Sridharan R, Hod R, Bahadzor B, et al. Ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscope treatment of impacted calculi: a prospective study. Korean J Urol 2015; 56:63-7.
doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.63 pmid: 25598938
[14] Tran TY, Bamberger JN, Blum KA, Parkhomenko E, Thai J, Chandhoke RA, et al. Predicting the impacted ureteral stone with computed tomography. Urology 2019; 130:43-7.
doi: S0090-4295(19)30377-2 pmid: 31029671
[15] Deguchi R, Yamashita S, Kikkawa K, Kohjimoto Y, Hara I. HU above-below ratio is an useful preoperative factor for predicting impacted ureteral calculi. Eur Urol Open Sci 2020; 19: e840-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33145-1.
[16] May PC, Hsi RS, Tran H, Stoller ML, Chew BH, Chi T, et al. The morbidity of ureteral strictures in patients with prior ureteroscopic stone surgery: multi-institutional outcomes. J Endourol 2018; 32:309-14.
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0657 pmid: 29325445
[17] Sugino T, Taguchi K, Hamamoto S, Okada T, Isogai M, Tanaka Y, et al. Risk factors for failure of endoscopic management of stone-related ureteral strictures. Urol J 2021; 19:95-100.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)73208-9
[18] Elashry OM, Elgamasy AK, Sabaa MA, Abo-Elenien M, Omar MA, Eltatawy HH, et al. Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: a 15-year single-centre experience. BJU Int 2008; 102:1010-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07747.x pmid: 18485033
[19] Al-Nabulsi Z, Phan YC, Abdalla O, Austin T, Tanasescu G, Osborn P, et al. Surgical and radiological predictive factors for ureteric stricture formation in patients treated with ureteroscopy for ureteric stones. Scand J Urol 2021; 55: 394-8.
[20] Xi Q, Wang S, Ye Z, Liu J. Combined removal of stones with resection of concurrent pathologic ureter may be a preferred treatment for impacted ureteral stones with stricture lesions. J Endourol 2009; 23:243-7.
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0507 pmid: 19220083
[21] Chandhoke R, Bamberger JN, Gallante B, Atallah W, Gupta M. Peri-calculus ureteral thickness on computed tomography predicts stone impaction at time of surgery: a prospective study. J Endourol 2020; 34:107-11.
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0449 pmid: 31650853
[22] Selvi I, Baydilli N, Tokmak TT, Akinsal EC, Basar H. CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones _10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Urolithiasis 2021; 49:227-37.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01214-6
[23] Gong B, Wu Y, O’Keeffe ME, Berger FH, McLaughlin PD, Nicolaou S, et al. Top 50 highly cited articles on dual energy computed tomography (DECT) in abdominal radiology: a bibliometric analysis. Pol J Radiol 2017; 82:748-59.
doi: 10.12659/PJR.904075
[24] Dretler SP, Young RH. Stone granuloma: a cause of ureteral stricture. J Urol 1993; 150:1800-2.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35899-8 pmid: 8230508
[25] Morgentaler A, Bridge SS, Dretler SP. Management of the impacted ureteral calculus. J Urol 1990; 143:263-6.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39928-7 pmid: 1967657
[26] Huffiman J. Abnormal ureter and intrarenal collecting system. Urol Endosc Manual Atlas 1985:59-73.
[27] Shen Y, Xiang A, Shao S. Preoperative hydronephrosis is a predictive factor of ureteral stenosis after flexible ureteroscopy: a propensity scores matching analysis. BMC Urol 2021; 21:153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00917-1.
doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00917-1 pmid: 34763687
[28] Abat D, B?reko?lu A, Altunkol A, K?se I, Bo?a MS. Is there any predictive value of the ratio of the upper to the lower diameter of the ureter for ureteral stone impaction? Curr Urol 2021;15: 161-6.
[29] Roberts WW, Cadeddu JA, Micali S, Kavoussi LR, Moore RG. Ureteral stricture formation after removal of impacted calculi. J Urol 1998; 159:723-6.
pmid: 9474134
[30] Devarajan R, Ashraf M, Beck RO, Lemberger RJ, Taylor MC. Holmium:YAG lasertripsy for ureteric calculi: an experience of 300 procedures. Br J Urol 1998; 82:342-7.
pmid: 9772868
[31] Yoshida T, Inoue T, Omura N, Okada S, Hamamoto S, Kinoshita H, et al. Ureteral wall thickness as a preoperative indicator of impacted stones in patients with ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urology 2017; 106:45-9.
doi: S0090-4295(17)30471-5 pmid: 28499762
[32] Weizer AZ, Auge BK, Silverstein AD, Delvecchio FC, Brizuela RM, Dahm P, et al. Routine postoperative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Urol 2002; 168:46-50.
pmid: 12050490
No related articles found!
[1] Ponco Birowo,Nur Rasyid,Chaidir A. Mochtar,Bambang S. Noegroho,H.R. Danarto,Besut Daryanto,Lukman Hakim,Dyandra Parikesit,Fakhri Rahman,S. Cahyo Ariwicaksono. Daily activities and training experiences of urology residents during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Indonesia: A nationwide survey[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(2): 119 -127 .
[2] Saeed R. Khan,Benjamin K. Canales. Proposal for pathogenesis-based treatment options to reduce calcium oxalate stone recurrence[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 246 -257 .
[3] Guohua Zeng,Wei Zhu. Urolithiasis: From pathogenesis to management (part one)[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 213 -214 .
[4] Rasim Güzel,Ümit Yildirim,Kemal Sarica. Contemporary minimal invasive surgical management of stones in children[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 239 -245 .
[5] Lazaros Tzelves,Patrick Juliebø-Jones,Ioannis Manolitsis,Themistoklis Bellos,Ioannis Mykoniatis,Marinos Berdempes,Titos Markopoulos,Michael Lardas,Belthangady M. Zeeshan Hameed,Panagiotis Angelopoulos,Amelia Pietropaolo,Bhaskar Somani,Ioannis Varkarakis,Andreas Skolarikos. Radiation protection measures during endourological therapies[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 215 -225 .
[6] Giorgio Mazzon,Simon Choong,Antonio Celia. Stone-scoring systems for predicting complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review of the literature[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 226 -238 .
[7] Anastasios Anastasiadis,Antonios Koudonas,Georgios Langas,Stavros Tsiakaras,Dimitrios Memmos,Ioannis Mykoniatis,Evangelos N. Symeonidis,Dimitrios Tsiptsios,Eliophotos Savvides,Ioannis Vakalopoulos,Georgios Dimitriadis,Jean de la Rosette. Transforming urinary stone disease management by artificial intelligence-based methods: A comprehensive review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 258 -274 .
[8] Reza Mehrazin, Shirin Razdan. Utility of three-dimensional virtual reconstruction for robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy using the IRIS[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 388 -389 .
[9] Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Clara Cerrato, Zhenjie Wu, Antonio Franco, Francesco Del Giudice, Alessandro Sciarra, Paolo Verze, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Ciro Imbimbo, Sisto Perdonà, Edward E. Cherullo, Francesco Porpiglia, Ithaar H. Derweesh, Riccardo Autorino. A systematic review of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes for advanced indications: Large tumors (cT2-T3), solitary kidney, completely endophytic, hilar, recurrent, and multiple renal tumors[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 390 -406 .
[10] Enrico Checcucci, Alberto Piana, Gabriele Volpi, Pietro Piazzolla, Daniele Amparore, Sabrina De Cillis, Federico Piramide, Cecilia Gatti, Ilaria Stura, Enrico Bollito, Federica Massa, Michele Di Dio, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia. Three-dimensional automatic artificial intelligence driven augmented-reality selective biopsy during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A feasibility and accuracy study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(4): 407 -415 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed