|
|
A pilot clinical study of developing an External Assist Targeting Device for rapid and precise renal calyx access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
Qinghui Wua,Kesavan Esuvaranathana,b,Teck Kheng Leec,Soo Leong Fooc,Jian Ping Chaid,*( ),Edmund Chionga,b
|
a Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore b Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore c Institute of Technical Education, Technology Development Centre, Singapore d Invivo Medical Pte. Ltd., Singapore |
|
|
Abstract Objective To design a device to increase the accuracy of the targeting process and reduce the radiation exposure to both the patients and the medical staff. Methods We analyzed the inherent problem and designed the External Assist Targeting Device (EATD) to assist in the alignment of needle targeting on the desired renal calyx under fluoroscopic guidance. The EATD was designed to allow rapid and precise access to calyces at all angles, with a simple two-step puncture protocol developed for puncturing a target renal calyx. We then tested the device in a pilot human trial with four patients. Results In experiments with phantom models, the time for successful targeting was reduced by 31% using the device. The mean fluoroscopic time was reduced by 40%. In initial human trial, the puncture time was shortened by 66% and the radiation dose was decreased by 65% compared to free-hand technique. No complication was observed during the trial. Conclusion The EATD was found to be cost effective, portable, simple to set up, and safe to operate for assisting in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Our preliminary tests showed high degree of accuracy in gaining precise access to a targeted renal calyx with much shorter time and lesser radiation dose. The EATD also has the potential to be used to access other organs with precision under fluoroscopic guidance.
|
Received: 28 May 2021
Available online:
|
Corresponding Authors:
Jian Ping Chai
E-mail: joseph.chai@invivo-medical.com
|
|
|
|
Triangulation using biplanar alignment. (A) Set up X-ray at 0°; (B) Establish vertical plane; (C) Align vertical plane with target and entry point; (D) Set X-ray to between 20° to 30°; (E) Align needle to target within vertical plane; (F) Push needle towards target.
|
|
Urologist controlling the External Assist Targeting Device to fine tune and aim the needle under fluoroscopy guidance during percutaneous nephrolithotomy; note that his hands were working outside direct radiation exposure most of the time.
|
|
Fluoroscopy screens and schematic drawings. (A) The fluoroscope being set at 0°; (B) The needle aligned to establish the vertical plane on the target point; (C) The fluoroscope being turned and set between 15° and 45°; (D) “Depth” view of the needle aligned to the target. Adj 1, adjustment for lateral rotation; Adj 2, adjustment for lateral translation; Adj 3, adjustment for needle rotation in the plane.
|
|
Urologist pushing the needle in after achieving all the alignments. Successful puncture was confirmed by fingertip tactile feedback from the metal bead. The gelatin was later cut to examine the needle tract.
|
|
X-ray images of a gelatin model. (A) Obtained at 0° showing alignment of the first plane; (B) Obtained at 30° offset showing the alignment of the depth.
|
Group | Mean puncture time | Mean fluoroscope screening time | Conventional free-hand, s | With EATD, s | Improvement, % | Conventional free-hand, s | With EATD, s | Improvement, % | Urologist | 87 | 60 | 31 | 20 | 12 | 40 | Engineer (untrained in PCNL) | NA | 117 | NA | NA | 19 | NA |
|
Comparison of mean puncture time and fluoroscope screening time between free-hand and device-assisted procedure.
|
Method | Number of trials, n | Successful puncture in the 1st attempt, n | Successful puncture in >1 attempt, n | Conventional free-hand | 6 | 4 | 2 | With EATD | 7 | 7 | 0 |
|
Comparison of number of attempts by urologists needed to achieve successful puncture between free-hand and device-assisted procedure (p<0.01).
|
Demographic and clinical characteristic | Device (n=9) | Control (n=4) | p-Value | Mean age, year | 55.2 | 46.3 | 0.09 | Gender, n (%) | Male | 4 (44.4) | 2 (50.0) | 0.85 | Female | 5 (55.6) | 2 (50.0) | 0.67 | Laterality, left, n (%) | 5 (55.6) | 2 (50.0) | 0.43 | Mean stone size, mm | 35.5 | 37.2 | 0.44 | Hydronephrosis, n (%) | No | 6 (66.7) | 2 (50.0) | 0.57 | Yes | 3 (33.3) | 2 (50.0) | 0.96 | Mean time for puncture, min | 5.2 | 15.2 | <0.01 | Mean radiation dose, mGy | 6.8 | 19.3 | <0.01 |
|
Demographic and clinical characteristic of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients.
|
[1] |
Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10: 257-9.
doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
pmid: 1006190
|
[2] |
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Part II. J Urol 2016; 196:1161-9.
|
[3] |
Türk C, Pet?ík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:475-82.
|
[4] |
Ng CF. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the learning curve and options. Arab J Urol 2014; 12:54-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.002
|
[5] |
Majidpour HS. Risk of radiation exposure during PCNL. Urol J 2010; 7:87-9.
pmid: 20535693
|
[6] |
de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomyda critical review. Eur Urol 2008; 54:994-1001.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.052
pmid: 18394783
|
[7] |
Allen D, O’Brien T, Tiptaft R, Glass J. Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2005; 19: 279-82.
pmid: 15865512
|
[8] |
Sharma GR, Luitel B. Techniques for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous renal access: an analytical review. Indian J Urol 2019; 35:259-66.
doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_149_19
|
[9] |
Barbaric ZL, Hall T, Cochran ST, Heitz DR, Schwartz RA, Krasny RM, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy: placement under CT and fluoroscopy guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:151-5.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.1.9207516
|
[10] |
Nolte-Ernsting CC, Bucker A, Neuerburg JM, Glowinski A, Adam GB, Gunther RW.MR imaging-guided percutaneous nephrostomy and use of MR-compatible catheters in the nondilated porcine urinary tract. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10: 1305-14.
|
[11] |
Lazarus J, Williams J. The locator: novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy apparatus to aid collecting system punctureda preliminary report. J Endourol 2011; 25:747-50.
|
[12] |
Zarrabi AD, Conradie JP, Heyns CF, Scheffer C, Schreve K. Development of a computer assisted gantry system for gaining rapid and accurate calyceal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Braz J Urol 2010; 36:738-48.
pmid: 21176281
|
[13] |
Wu J, Zhou P, Luo X, Hao Z, Lu C, Zhang H, et al. Novel laser positioning navigation to aid puncture during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a preliminary report. World J Urol 2019; 37: 1189-96.
|
[14] |
Huber J, Wegner I, Meinzer H-P, Hallscheidt P, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, et al. Multimedia article. Navigated renal access using electromagnetic tracking: an initial experience. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:1307-12.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1338-x
pmid: 20835720
|
[15] |
Su L-M, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW, Patriciu A, Roberts WW, Cadeddu JA, et al. Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol 2002; 16: 471-5.
doi: 10.1089/089277902760367421
|
[1] |
Rasim Güzel,Ümit Yildirim,Kemal Sarica. Contemporary minimal invasive surgical management of stones in children[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 239-245. |
[2] |
Giorgio Mazzon,Simon Choong,Antonio Celia. Stone-scoring systems for predicting complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review of the literature[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 226-238. |
[3] |
Wei Zhu,Zhicong Huang,Guohua Zeng. Miniaturization in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What is new?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 275-280. |
[4] |
. Reliability of nephrolithometric nomograms in patients treated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A precision study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(1): 70-80. |
[5] |
Pankaj N. Maheshwari,Amandeep Arora,Mahesh S. Sane,Vivek Jadhao. Evaluating factors associated with the risk of hydrothorax following standard supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(3): 301-306. |
[6] |
Sujeet Poudyal. Current insights on haemorrhagic complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(1): 81-93. |
[7] |
Abhishek Gajendra Singh,Sundaram Palaniappan,Shrikant Jai,Gopal Tak,Arvind Ganpule,Ravindra Sabnis,Mahesh Desai. The clinical outcomes of laser with suction device in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(1): 63-68. |
[8] |
Dilip K. Mishra,Sonia Bhatt,Sundaram Palaniappan,Talamanchi V.K. Reddy,Vinothkumar Rajenthiran,Y.L. Sreeranga,Madhu S. Agrawal. Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(1): 75-80. |
[9] |
Yiwei Wang, Liheng Gao, Mingxi Xu, Wenfeng Li, Yuanshen Mao, Fujun Wang, Lu Wang, Jun Da, Zhong Wang. A novel spherical-headed fascial dilator is feasible for second-stage ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A pilot study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 424-429. |
[10] |
Sudharsan Balaji,Arvind Ganpule,Thomas Herrmann,Ravindra Sabnis,Mahesh Desai. Contemporary role of multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of complex renal calculi[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 102-109. |
[11] |
Etienne Xavier Kellera,Vincent De Conincka,Steeve Doizia,Olivier Traxer. The role of ureteroscopy for treatment of staghorn calculi: A systematic review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 110-115. |
[12] |
Osman Ermis,Bhaskar Somani,Thomas Reeves,Selcuk Guven,Pilar Laguna Pes,Arun Chawla,Padmaraj Hegde,Jean de la Rosette. Definition, treatment and outcome of residual fragments in staghorn stones[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 116-121. |
[13] |
Nariman Gadzhiev,Vigen Malkhasyan,Gagik Akopyan,Sergei Petrov,Francis Jefferson,Zhamshid Okhunov. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: Troubleshooting and managing complications[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 139-148. |
[14] |
Jared S. Winoker,Ryan A. Chandhoke,William Atallah,Mantu Gupta. Morphometry scores: Clinical implications in the management of staghorn calculi[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 78-86. |
[15] |
Arvind P. Ganpule,M. Naveen Kumar Reddy,S.B. Sudharsan,Shaishav B. Shah,Ravindra B. Sabnis,Mahesh R. Desai. Multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in staghorn calculus[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 94-101. |
|
|
|
|