|
|
The role of quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score as simple scoring system to predict Fournier gangrene mortality and the correlation with Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index: Analysis of 69 patients |
Bambang S. Noegroho*( ),Kuncoro Adi,Akhmad Mustafa*( ),Rais Syaeful Haq,Zola Wijayanti,Jason Liarto
|
Urology Department, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia |
|
|
Abstract Objective: Fournier's gangrene is a rare but life-threatening infection disease with high mortality rate. The quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a new and simpler scoring system that may identify patients with suspected infection who are at greater risk for a poor outcome. The purpose of this study was to find out role of qSOFA in determining prognosis of Fournier's gangrene patients. Methods: This study is a case control with retrospective review of Fournier's gangrene patients treated at Hasan Sadikin Hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 who met inclusion criteria. Participants were divided into two groups according to qSOFA score as high qSOFA (2-3) and low qSOFA (0-1). Results: From 69 patients, the mortality rate was 24.6%. The sensitivity of qSOFA score to predict mortality was 88.2%; the specificity was 94.2%; positive predictive value was 83.3%; negative predictive value was 96.1%; positive likelihood ratio was 15.2; negative likelihood ratio was 0.12; and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of qSOFA was 94.2%. There was significant association between qSOFA scale and mortality with p-value of 0.0001. The qSOFA score has strong positive correlation with Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (p<0.0001, r=0.704). Conclusion: qSOFA scoring system has a high prognostic value and can be used to determine prognosis of Fournier's gangrene patients.
|
Received: 16 November 2020
Available online: 20 April 2023
|
Corresponding Authors:
Bambang S. Noegroho,Akhmad Mustafa
E-mail: bsn.urologi@gmail.com;mustafa.urologi@gmail.com
|
|
|
Variable | Score | Glasgow Coma Scale score <15 | 1 | Respiratory rate ≥22 breaths per minute | 1 | Systolic blood pressure ≤100 mmHg | 1 |
|
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score.
|
Parameter | Group 1 (survivor), n=52 | Group 2 (non-survivor), n=17 | p-Value | Age, mean±SD, year | 51.13±14.56 | 60.17±11.32 | 0.018a | Systolic BP, mean±SD, mmHg | 117.86±19.75 | 103.50±23.17 | 0.031a | GCS score, median (interquartile range) | 15 (13-15) | 13 (10-15) | 0.0001b | Respiratory rate, mean±SD, number of breaths per minute | 21.27±2.88 | 26.94±5.34 | 0.001a | Comorbidity, n (%) | Chronic kidney disease | 2 (3.8) | 5 (29.4) | 0.067c | Heart failure | 3 (5.8) | 3 (17.6) | 0.101c | Diabetes | 21 (40.4) | 7 (41.2) | 0.954c | Tuberculosis | 2 (3.8) | 0 (0) | 0.412c | HIV | 1 (1.9) | 1 (5.9) | 0.398c | Autoimmune | 1 (1.9) | 0 (0) | 0.565c | Perianal abscess | 16 (30.8) | 9 (52.9) | 0.099c | Carbuncle | 19 (36.5) | 6 (35.3) | 0.926c | Urethral stricture | 13 (25.0) | 1 (5.9) | 0.089c | Laboratory result, mean±SD | Hb, g/dL | 11.47±3.11 | 10.52±2.99 | 0.262a | Leucocyte, number per mm3 | 17 423.14±9129.00 | 19 003.23±9696.00 | 0.545a | Thrombocyte, number per mm3 | 384 921.57±175 107.00 | 266 937.50±153 547.00 | 0.018a | Sodium, mEq/L | 130.61±5.99 | 128.06±8.26 | 0.176a | Potassium, mmol/L | 4.69±4.836 | 4.41±1.121 | 0.809a | BUN, mg/dL | 67.43±59.94 | 92.94±49.98 | 0.095a | Creatinine, mg/dL | 2.19±2.77 | 2.09±1.16 | 0.833a | HCO3?, mEq/L | 22.70±13.48 | 26.68±12.27 | 0.136a | Random blood glucose, mg/dL | 177.36±138.80 | 162.46±100.43 | 0.671a | Albumin, g/dL | 2.383±0.894 | 1.730±0.404 | 0.017a | FGSI score, n (%) | <9 | 47 (90.4) | 1 (5.9) | 0.0001b | ≥9 | 5 (9.6) | 16 (94.1) | | qSOFA score, n (%) | Low risk (0-1) | 49 (94.2) | 2 (11.8) | 0.0001b | High risk (2-3) | 3 (5.8) | 15 (88.2) | |
|
Fournier gangrene patient demographic.
|
|
Area under receiver operating characteristic curve. (A) Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score; (B) Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index score.
|
Variable | qSOFA | FGSI | r-Value | p-Valuea | Sensitivity | 88.2% | 94.1% | 0.704 | 0.0001 | Specificity | 94.2% | 90.3% | Positive predictive value | 83.3% | 76.1% | Negative predictive value | 96.1% | 97.9% | Positive likelihood ratio | 15.2 | 9.7 | Negative likelihood ratio | 0.12 | 0.065 | Area under the curve | 94.2% | 91.2% |
|
Correlation of qSOFA and FGSI scores.
|
Author | Year | Location | Data collection duration, year | Number of patients (number of patients per year) | Mortality rate, % | Laor et al. [5] | 1995 | USA | 15 | 30 (2) | 43.3 | Yilmazlar et al. [7] | 2010 | Turkey | 16 | 120 (7) | 20.5 | Shukla et al. [11] | 2016 | India | 4 | 57 (14) | 22.5 | Noegroho et al. [10] | 2021 | Turkey | 16 | 120 (7) | 20.5 | Benjelloun et al. [12] | 2013 | Morocco | 7 | 50 (7) | 24.0 | Yeniyol et al. [13] | 2004 | Turkey | 5 | 25 (5) | 24.0 | Hejase et al. [14] | 1996 | Mexico | 3 | 38 (3) | 2.6 | Tahmaz et al. [15] | 2006 | Turkey | 15 | 33 (2) | 6.0 | Sallami et al. [31] | 2012 | Tunisia | 15 | 40 (3) | 17.5 | McCormack et al. [32] | 2015 | Canada | 12 | 26 (2) | 19.2 | Sánchez Mazzaferri et al. [33] | 1999 | Spain | 10 | 9 (1) | 22.5 |
|
Previous series of Fournier gangrene.
|
[1] |
Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, Cherian J, Barua J, Shergill I, et al. Fournier’s gangrene and its emergency management. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82:516-9.
doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.042069
pmid: 16891442
|
[2] |
Heyns CF, Theron PD. Fournier’s gangrene. In: Hohenfellner M, Santucci RA, editors. Emergencies in urology. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p50-9.
|
[3] |
Grabe M, Bartoletti R, Johansen TEB, Cai T, Cek M, Koves B, et al. Guidelines on urological infections. European Association of Urology Guidelines; 2017. https://uroweb.org/ guideline/urological-infections/.[Accessed 26 August 2020].
|
[4] |
Singh A, Ahmed K, Aydin A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Fournier’s gangrene. A clinical review. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2016; 88: 157-64.
doi: 10.4081/aiua.2016.3.157
|
[5] |
Laor E, Palmer LS, Tolia BM, Reid RE, Winter HI. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s Gangrene. J Urol 1995; 154:89-92.
pmid: 7776464
|
[6] |
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-29.
pmid: 3928249
|
[7] |
Yilmazlar T, Ozturk E, Ozguc H, Ercan I, Vuruskan H, Oktay B. Fournier’s gangrene: an analysis of 80 patients and a novel scoring system. Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14:217-23.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0592-1
pmid: 20559857
|
[8] |
Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). J Am Med Assoc 2016; 315: 762-74.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288
|
[9] |
Doluo?lu ?G, Karag?z MA, K?l?n? MF, Karakan T, Yücetürk CN, Sar?c? H, et al. Overview of different scoring systems in Fournier’s gangrene and assessment of prognostic factors. Turk J Urol 2016; 42: 190-6.
|
[10] |
Noegroho BS, Siregar S, Mustafa A, Rivaldi MA. Validation of FGSI scores in predicting Fournier gangrene in tertiary hospi-tal. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:341-6.
|
[11] |
Shukla PK, Ghanghoria A, Yedalwar V. Fournier’s gangrene: a prospective study of 57 patients with special reference to validity of Fournier’s gangrene severity index in predicting the outcome and mortality. Int Surg J 2016; 3:1256-61.
|
[12] |
Benjelloun EB, Souiki T, Yakla N, Ousadden A, Mazaz K, Louchi A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: our experience with 50 patients and analysis of factors affecting mortality. World J Emerg Surg 2013; 8:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-8-13.
|
[13] |
Yeniyol CO, Suelozgen T, Arslan M, Ayder AR. Fournier’s gangrene: experience with 25 patients and use of Fournier’s gangrene severity index score. Urology 2004; 64:218-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.049
pmid: 15302463
|
[14] |
Hejase MJ, Simonin JE, Bihrle R, Coogan CL. Genital Fournier’s gangrene: experience with 38 patients. Urology 1996; 47: 734-9.
pmid: 8650874
|
[15] |
Tahmaz L, Erdemir F, Kibar Y, Cosar A, Yalcy ′n O. Fournier’s gangrene: report of thirty-three cases and a review of the literature. Int J Urol 2006; 13:960-7.
|
[16] |
Pandey S, Narayan Sankhwar S, Goel A, Kumar M, Aggarwal A, Sharma D, et al. Quick Sequential (Sepsis related) Organ Failure Assessment: a high performance rapid prognostication tool in patients having acute pyelonephritis with upper urinary tract calculi. Investig Clin Urol 2019; 60:120-6.
doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.2.120
pmid: 30838345
|
[17] |
Fukushima H, Kobayashi M, Kawano K, Morimoto S. Performance of Quick Sequential (Sepsis related) and Sequential (Sepsis related) Organ Failure Assessment to predict mortality in patients with acute pyelonephritis associated with upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol 2018; 199:1526-33.
doi: S0022-5347(17)78189-X
pmid: 29291417
|
[18] |
Roghmann F, Von Bodman C, Loppenberg B, Hinkel A, Palisaar J, Noldus J. Is there a need for Fournier’s gangrene severity index? Comparison of scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s gangrene. BJU Int 2012; 110:1359-65.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11082.x
pmid: 22494217
|
[19] |
Martinschek A, Evers B, Lampl L, Gernros H, Schmidt R, Sparwasser C. Prognostic aspects, survival rate, and predisposing risk factors in patients with Fournier’s gangrene and necrotizing soft tissue infections: evaluation of clinical outcome of 55 patients. Urol Int 2012; 89:173-9.
doi: 10.1159/000339161
pmid: 22759538
|
[20] |
Erol B, Tuncel A, Hanci V, Tokgoz H, Yildiz A, Akduman B, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: overview of prognostic factors and definition of new prognostic parameter. Urology 2010; 75: 1193-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.090
|
[21] |
Corcoran AT, Smaldone MC, Gibbons EP, Walsh TJ, Davies BJ. Validation of the Fournier’s gangrene severity index in a large contemporary series. J Urol 2008; 180:944-8.
|
[22] |
Altarac S, Katusin D, Crnica S, Papes D, Rajkovic Z, Arslani N. Fournier’s gangrene: etiology and outcome analysis of 41 patients. Urol Int 2012; 88:289-93.
doi: 10.1159/000335507
pmid: 22433163
|
[23] |
Sonneville R, Verdonk F, Rauturier C, Klein IF, Wolff M, Annane D, et al. Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis. Ann Intensive Care 2013; 3:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-15.
doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-15
pmid: 23718252
|
[24] |
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:707-10.
doi: 10.1007/BF01709751
|
[25] |
Dolan R, Polito C, Isakov A, Yancey A, Bloom I, Martin GS, et al. Utility of pre-hospital Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting in- hospital mortality in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193:A7619. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2016.193.1_MeetingAbstracts.A7619.
|
[26] |
Dewitte A, Lepreux S, Villeneuve J, Rigothier C, Combe C, Ouattara A, et al. Blood platelets and sepsis pathophysiology: a new therapeutic prospect in critically ill patients? Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0337-7.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0337-7
|
[27] |
Venkata C, Kashyap R, Farmer JC, Afessa B. Thrombocyto- penia in adult patients with sepsis: incidence, risk factors, and its association with clinical outcome. J Intensive Care 2013; 1:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-0492-1-9.
doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-1-9
|
[28] |
Sun JK, Sun F, Wang X, Yuan ST, Zheng SY, Mu XW. Risk factors and prognosis of hypoalbuminemia in surgical septic patients. PeerJ 2015; 3:e1267. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1267.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.1267
|
[29] |
Jiang J, Yang J, Mei J, Jin Y, Lu Y. Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2018; 26:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9
|
[30] |
Liu YC, Luo YY, Zhang X, Shou ST, Gao YL, Lu B, et al. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a prognostic factor for infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Emerg Med 2019; 14:603-15.
doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02036-0
|
[31] |
Sallami S, Maalla R, Gammoudi A, Jdidia B, Tarhouni L, Horchani A. Fournier’s gangrene: what are the prognostic factors? Our experience with 40 patients. Tunis Med 2012; 90: 708-14.
|
[32] |
McCormack M, Valiquette AS, Ismail S. Fournier’s gangrene: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases in a Canadian hospital and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9:E407-10. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2445.
|
[33] |
Sánchez Mazzaferri F, Fadil Iturralde JL, Provenzal O, Damiani H, Milman A, Bragagnolo J, et al. [Fournier’s gangrene. Our experience over 10 years. A review of the literature]. Arch Esp Urol 1999; 52:721-7. [Article in Spanish].
pmid: 10540762
|
[1] |
Leandro Blas,Masaki Shiota,Shohei Nagakawa,Shigehiro Tsukahara,Takashi Matsumoto,Ken Lee,Keisuke Monji,Eiji Kashiwagi,Junichi Inokuchi,Masatoshi Eto. Validation of user-friendly models predicting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer patients[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(1): 81-88. |
[2] |
R. Sekar Rishi,Patil Dattatraya,Baum Yoram,Pearl Jeffrey,Bausum Anna,A. Bilen Mehmet,Kucuk Omer,B. Harris Wayne,C. Carthon Bradley,Alemozaffar Mehrdad,P. Filson Christopher,G. Pattaras John,T. Nieh Peter,Ogan Kenneth,A. Master Viraj. A novel preoperative inflammatory marker prognostic score in patients with localized[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(4): 230-238. |
[3] |
Darab Mehraban. Clinical value of intravesical prostatic protrusion in the evaluation and management of prostatic and other lower urinary tract diseases[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(3): 174-180. |
[4] |
Rishi R. Sekar, Claire M. De La Calle, Dattatraya Patil, Sarah A. Holzman, Yoram Baum, Umer Sheikh, Jonathan H. Huang, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Brian P. Pollack, Haydn T. Kissick, Kenneth Ogan, Viraj A. Master. Major histocompatibility complex I upregulation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma is associated with increased survival[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2016, 3(2): 75-81. |
[5] |
Yoram S. Baum, Dattatraya Patil, Jonathan H. Huang, Stephanie Spetka, Mersiha Torlak, Peter T. Nieh, Mehrdad Alemozaffar, Kenneth Ogan, Viraj A. Master. Elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be associated with decreased overall survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2016, 3(1): 20-25. |
|
|
|
|