|
|
The relationship between sexually transmitted microorganisms and seminal quality in asymptomatic men |
Valentina Velásquez Rivera,Walter D. Cardona Maya,Jenniffer Puerta-Suárez( )
|
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Medical School, University of Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To detect DNA of different microorganisms, in semen samples from apparently healthy men and correlate their presence with seminal quality. Methods:Semen samples from 81 healthy volunteers were collected, and semen parameters were analyzed. DNA extraction was performed using the phenol-chloroform technique, and the microorganisms were detected by the amplification of specific primers using polymerase chain reaction. Results:DNA from at least one of the microorganisms was detected in 78 samples. The most frequent microorganism found in semen were: Lactobacillus spp. (70%), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (N. gonorrhoeae) (36%), Streptococcus epidermidis (64%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (56%), Staphylococcus aureus (32%), Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) (28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (27%). The seminal parameters of all semen samples were over the lower reference values for normal semen analysis. To compare with negative samples, seminal volume was higher for the Escherichia coli positive samples and lower for Pseudomonas aeruginosa positive samples. Semen samples positive for Staphylococcus aureus had worse sperm morphology. The frequency of progressive motility was higher in positive samples for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis. Positive semen samples for C. trachomatis had a higher concentration per milliliter. Conclusion:It is common to find microorganisms in semen of asymptomatic men, including those responsible for sexually transmitted infections. Antimicrobial treatment is recommended only in those individuals with a sexually transmitted infection (C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae) and always promote condom use.
|
Received: 01 July 2020
Available online: 20 October 2022
|
Corresponding Authors:
Jenniffer Puerta-Suárez
E-mail: jenniffer.puerta@udea.edu.co
|
|
|
Microorganism | Detection, n (%) | Volumea, mL | Concentrationa, 106/mL | Total concentrationa, 106 per ejaculate | Viabilitya, % | Progressive motilitya, % | Total motilitya, % | Normal morphologya, % | C. trachomatis | Negative, 58 (72); | 3.05 (1.2-7.1) | 68 (0-440) | 183 (0-1379) | 69 (0-90) | 51 (0-78) | 58 (0-100) | 5.0 (1.0-10.0) | positive, 23 (28); | 3 (1.5-7) | 110 (39-454)?? | 336 (117-774)?? | 78 (68-88)?? | 58 (40-78)?? | 65 (47-81)? | 4.4 (2.0-9.0) | N. gonorrhoeae | Negative, 52 (64); | 2.9 (1.3-7) | 78 (0-440) | 213 (0-1379) | 70 (0-90) | 51 (0-78) | 58 (0-100) | 4.8 (1.0-10.0) | positive, 29 (36) | 3.5 (1.2-7.1) | 95 (0-454) | 225 (0-809) | 74 (0-89) | 54 (0-75) | 64 (30-100)? | 5.1 (2.0-7.8) | E. coli | Negative, 67 (83); | 3 (1.2-7.1) | 82 (0-440) | 221 (0-1232) | 72 (0-89) | 51 (0-78) | 58 (0-100) | 4.8 (1.0-10.0) | positive, 14 (17) | 4 (1.5-7)? | 83 (0-454) | 260 (0-1379) | 75 (0-90) | 54 (0-78) | 68 (37-100) | 6.0 (3.0-7.8) | K. pneumoniae | Negative, 36 (44); | 3.1 (1.2-7.1) | 88 (0-294) | 260 (0-1379) | 70 (0-90) | 53 (0-75) | 61 (2-100) | 5.0 (2.0-9.0) | positive, 45 (56) | 3 (1.5-5.7) | 76 (0-454) | 211 (0-1232) | 73 (0-88) | 51 (0-78) | 62 (14-100) | 4.8 (1.0-10.0) | Lactobacillus spp. | Negative, 24 (30); | 2.7 (1.2-5.2) | 90 (7-440) | 297 (0-1232) | 70 (48-88) | 50 (1-71) | 55 (2-80) | 5.6 (2.0-9.0) | positive, 57 (70) | 3.1 (1.3-7.1) | 76 (0-454) | 222 (0-1379) | 73 (0-90) | 54 (0-78) | 63 (0-100) | 4.7 (1.0-10.0) | P. aeruginosa | Negative, 59 (72); | 3.1 (1.2-7.1) | 82 (0-294) | 242 (0-1379) | 73 (48-88) | 50 (0-90) | 53 (0-78) | 4.9 (2.0-10.0) | positive, 22 (27) | 2.6 (1.4-5)? | 80 (3-454) | 188 (0-1232) | 70.5 (0-90) | 55 (48-89) | 51 (20-75) | 5.0 (1.0-8.0) | S. aureus | Negative, 55 (68); | 3.1 (1.3-7.1) | 86 (0-440) | 231 (0-1232) | 72 (0-89) | 53 (0-78) | 62 (2-100) | 5.4 (1.0-9.0) | positive, 26 (32) | 3.4 (1.5-7) | 80 (0-454) | 231 (0-1379) | 72 (0-90) | 51 (0-78) | 60 (25-100) | 4.2 (2.0-10.0)?? | S. epidermidis | Negative, 29 (36); | 3 (1.2-5.1) | 87 (3-454) | 199 (6-1232) | 73 (48-90) | 54 (3-74) | 61 (14-81) | 5.0 (2.0-9.0) | positive, 52 (64) | 3.1 (1.3-7) | 80 (0-294) | 241 (0-1379) | 72 (0-89) | 51 (0-78) | 61 (2-100) | 4.7 (1.0-10.0) |
|
Seminal parameters and PCR detection.
|
[1] |
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:2683e7.
|
[2] |
Gimenes F, Souza RP, Bento JC, Teixeira JJ, Maria-Engler SS, Bonini MG, et al. Male infertility: a public health issue caused by sexually transmitted pathogens. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11:672e87.
|
[3] |
Cai T, Wagenlehner FM, Mazzoli S, Meacci F, Mondaini N, Nesi G, et al. Semen quality in patients with Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection treated concurrently with prulifloxacin and a phytotherapeutic agent. J Androl 2012; 33: 615e23.
|
[4] |
World Health Organization. Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Reproductive health strategy to accelerate progress towards the attainment of international development goals and targets. World Health Organization; 2004. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/general/RHR_04_8/en/.[Accessed 20 December 2020].
|
[5] |
Zeyad A, Hamad MF, Hammadeh ME. The effects of bacterial infection onhumanspermnuclearprotamine P1/P2 ratio andDNA integrity. Andrologia 2018; 50:e12841. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12841.
|
[6] |
Al-Saadi BQH, Abd AS. The effect of bacterial infection on male infertility. Iraqi J Biotech 2019; 18:72e84.
|
[7] |
Liu J, Li H, Cao Z, Duan Y, Li Y, Ye Z. Influence of several uropathogenic microorganisms on human sperm motility parameters in vitro. Asian J Androl 2002; 4:179e82.
|
[8] |
Sanocka-Maciejewska D, Ciupinska M, Kurpisz M. Bacterial infection and semen quality. J Reprod Immunol 2005; 67:51e6.
|
[9] |
Bailey RR. Significance of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in urine. J Infect Dis 1973; 127:179e82.
|
[10] |
Gupta S, Prabha V. Human sperm interaction with Staphylococcus aureus: a molecular approach. J Pathog 2012; 2012: 816536. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/816536.
|
[11] |
Villegas J, Schulz M, Soto L, Sanchez R. Bacteria induce expression of apoptosis in human spermatozoa. Apoptosis 2005; 10:105e10.
|
[12] |
Pardo SG, Cháves MAC, Suarez JP, Giraldo M, Maya WC. Effect of soluble factors of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus epidermidis on sperm functionality. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecolog 2015; 80:316e23.
|
[13] |
Monga M, Roberts JA. Spermagglutination by bacteria: receptor-specific interactions. J Androl 1994; 15:151e6.
|
[14] |
Diemer T, Weidner W, Michelmann HW, Schiefer HG, Rovan E, Mayer F. Influence of Escherichia coli on motility parameters of human spermatozoa in vitro. Int J Androl 1996; 19:271e7.
|
[15] |
Guerrero-Hurtado L, Puerta-Suárez J, Cardona-Maya W. Role of sperm in the transmission of uropathogenic bacteria: Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis. Clínica Invest Ginecol Obstet 2018; 45:2e6.
|
[16] |
Cano-Chaves A, Galarzo-Pardo S, Puerta-Suarez J, Giraldo M, Cadavid A, Cardona-Maya W. Effect of uropathogenic bacteria and soluble factors produced by their metabolism on sperm quality: Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis. Clínica Invest Ginecol Obstet 2017; 44:106e12.
|
[17] |
Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015; 13:269e84.
|
[18] |
Meares EM. Prostatitis. Med Clin North Am 1991; 75:405e24.
|
[19] |
Puerta-Suárez J, Giraldo M, Cadavid áP, Cardona-Maya W. [Bacterial infections of the male reproductive tract and their role in fertility]. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecolog 2014; 79:209e17. [Article in Spanish].
|
[20] |
Gottschick C, Deng ZL, Vital M, Masur C, Abels C, PieperDH, et al. The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment. Microbiome 2017; 5:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3
pmid: 28807017
|
[21] |
Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 11:506e14.
|
[22] |
Valcarce DG, Genoves S, Riesco MF, Martorell P, Herraez MP, Ramon D, et al. Probiotic administration improves sperm quality in asthenozoospermic human donors. Benef Microbes 2017; 8:193e206.
|
[23] |
Ibarra A, Restrepo T, Rojas W, Castillo A, Amorim A, Martínez B, et al. Evaluating the X chromosome-specific diversity of Colombian populations using insertion/deletion polymorphisms. PloS One 2014; 9:e87202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087202.
|
[24] |
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 2010. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/reproductive-health/srhrdocuments/infertility/examination-and-processing-ofhuman-semen-5ed-eng.pdf. [Accessed 20 December 2020].
|
[25] |
Cardona-Maya W, Berdugo J, Cadavid A. Comparing the sperm concentration determined by the Makler and the Neubauer chambers. Actas Urol Esp 2008; 32:443e5.
|
[26] |
Puerta Suárez J, Cardona Maya WD. [Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Ureaplasma urealyticum in semen samples: effects on sperm quality]. Urología Colombiana 2016; 25:219e24. [Article in Spanish].
|
[27] |
WHO guidelines for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis. WHO guidelines approved by the guidelines review committee. Geneva. 2016. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/chlamydia-treatment-guidelines/en/. [Accessed 20 December 2020].
|
[28] |
Viscarra T, Brebi P, Andana A, Sánchez R. [Infecciones de transmisión sexual en semen: el hombre como vector de transmisión]. Int J Morphol 2013; 31:254e63. [Article in Spanish].
|
[29] |
Krause W, Bohring C. Male infertility and genital chlamydial infection: victim or perpetrator. Andrologia 2003; 35:209e16.
|
[30] |
Red book: 2003 report of the committee on infectious disease. Elk Grove Village: Pediatrics AAO; 2003. https://redbook.solutions.aap.org/DocumentLibrary/RB2003.pdf. [Accessed 20 December 2020].
|
[31] |
Gonzales GF, Munoz G, Sanchez R, Henkel R, Gallegos-Avila G, Diaz-Gutierrez O, et al. Update on the impact of Chlamydia trachomatis infection on male fertility. Andrologia 2004; 36: 1e23.
|
[32] |
Ness RB, Markovic N, Carlson CL, Coughlin MT. Do men become infertile after having sexually transmitted urethritis? An epidemiologic examination. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 205e13.
|
[33] |
Puerta Suarez J, Sanchez LR, Salazar FC, Saka HA, Molina R, Tissera A, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis neither exerts deleterious effects on spermatozoa nor impairs male fertility. Sci Rep 2017; 7:1e14.
|
[34] |
Osegbe DN. Testicular function after unilateral bacterial epididymo-orchitis. Eur Urol 1991; 19:204e8.
|
[35] |
Swenson CE, Toth A, Toth C, Wolfgruber L, O’Leary WM. Asymptomatic bacteriospermia in infertile men. Andrologia 1980; 12:7e11.
|
[36] |
Puerta Suárez J, Maya C, Walter D. [In vitro evaluation of the effect of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and the soluble factors resulting from its metabolism on sperm quality]. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecolog 2016; 81:211e7. [Articla in Spanish].
|
[37] |
Jiang J, Lu D. Detection of bacteria from semen of infertile males and their seminal parameters. Chin J Androl 1996; 10: 196e8.
|
[38] |
Emokpae M, Uadia P, Sadiq NM. Contribution of bacterial infection to male infertility in Nigerians. Online J Health Allied Sci 2009; 8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26627176.
|
[39] |
Okon K, Nwaogwu M, Zailani S, Chama C. Pattern of seminal fluid indices among infertile male partners attending the infertility clinic of University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri Nigeria. Highl Med Res J 2005; 3:18e23.
|
[40] |
Prabha V, Gupta T, Kaur S, Kaur N, Kala S, Singh A. Isolation of a spermatozoal immobilization factor from Staphylococcus aureus filtrates. Can J Microbiol 2009; 55:874e8.
|
[41] |
Ibadin O, Ibeh I. Bacteriospermia and sperm quality in infertile male patient at University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. Malays J Microbiol 2008; 4:65e7.
|
[42] |
Chen G. The effect of chronic bacterial prostatitis on the semen quality and function. Chin J Androl 1998; 12:78e81.
|
[43] |
Wolff H, Panhans A, Stolz W, Meurer M. Adherence of Escherichia coli to sperm: a mannose mediated phenomenon leading to agglutination of sperm and E. coli. Fertil Steril 1993; 60:154e8.
|
[44] |
Huwe P, Diemer T, Ludwig M, Liu J, Schiefer HG, Weidner W. Influence of different uropathogenic microorganisms on human sperm motility parameters in an in vitro experiment. Andrologia 1998; 30:55e9.
|
[45] |
Zuleta-Gonzalez MC, Zapata-Salazar ME, Guerrero-Hurtado LS, Puerta-Suarez J, Cardona-Maya WD. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Streptococcus agalactiae: passengers in the sperm travel. Arch Esp Urol 2019; 72:939e47.
|
[46] |
Weng SL, Chiu CM, Lin FM, Huang WC, Liang C, Yang T, et al. Bacterial communities in semen from men of infertile couples: metagenomic sequencing reveals relationships of seminal microbiota to semen quality. PloS One 2014; 9:e110152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110152.
|
[47] |
Hou D, Zhou X, Zhong X, Settles ML, Herring J, Wang L, et al. Microbiota of the seminal fluid from healthy and infertile men. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:1261e9.
|
[48] |
Baud D, Pattaroni C, Vulliemoz N, Castella V, Marsland BJ, Stojanov M. Sperm microbiota and its impact on semen parameters. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00234.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00234
pmid: 30809218
|
[49] |
Ejike CE, Ezeanyika LU. Prevalence of chronic prostatitis symptoms in a randomly surveyed adult population of urbancommunity-dwelling Nigerian males. Int J Urol 2008; 15:340e3.
|
[50] |
Farahani L, Tharakan T, Yap T, Ramsay JW, Jayasena CN, Minhas S. The semen microbiome and its impact on sperm function and male fertility: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Andrology 2020; 9:115e44.
|
[51] |
M?ndar R, Punab M, Korrovits P, Türk S, Ausmees K, Lapp E, et al. Seminal microbiome in men with and without prostatitis. Int J Urol 2017; 24:211e6.
|
[52] |
Gottschick C, Deng ZL, Vital M, Masur C, Abels C, Pieper DH, et al. The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment. Microbiome 2017; 5:1e15.
|
[53] |
Ivanov IB, Kuzmin MD, Gritsenko VA. Microflora of the seminal fluid of healthy men and men suffering from chronic prostatitis syndrome. Int J Urol 2009; 32:462e7.
|
[54] |
Alfano M, Ferrarese R, Locatelli I, Ventimiglia E, Ippolito S, Gallina P, et al. Testicular microbiome in azoospermic mendfirst evidence of the impact of an altered microenvironment. Hum Reprod 2018; 33:1212e7.
|
[55] |
Markowski MC, Boorjian SA, Burton JP, Hahn NM, Ingersoll MA, Vareki SM, et al. The microbiome and genitourinary cancer: a collaborative review. Eur Urol 2019; 75:637e46.
|
No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|