|
|
Predictors of renal angioembolization outcome: A retrospective analysis with 148 patients at a tertiary urology institute |
Hashim Mohamed Farga,Mohamed Mohamed Elawdyb,*( ),Karim Ali Solimanb,Mohamed Ali Badawya,Ali Elsorougya,Abdalla Abdelhamida,Tarek Mohsena,Tarek El-Diastya
|
a Department of Radiology, Urology and Nephrology Centre, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt b Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Centre, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt |
|
|
Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictor of unsuccessful outcome of renal angioembolization (RAE). Knowing those predictors may help in avoiding unnecessary RAE procedures and their associated side effects, while helping to prepare for an alternate procedure and improving patient's overall satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective analysis between January 2006 and December 2018 was performed, and the indications for RAE were classified into post-traumatic, iatrogenic, renal tumors, and spontaneous. Patients who underwent RAE prior to nephrectomy were eliminated. Computed tomography angiography was performed in patients with normal renal function and those who had no contrast allergy, otherwise magnetic resonance angiography was performed. For the purpose of statistical analysis, we stratified patients into two main categories based on the final outcome—successful or failed. Results: Of 180 patients, 32 with negative angiography were eliminated, leaving 148 patients; 136 (91%) had successful outcomes after one or more trials and 12 had unsuccessful outcomes. The mean age was 45±15 years, and 105 (71%) were male. Neither gender, side of the lesion, presence of hematuria, indication for RAE, nor the type of lesion affected the outcome. On the other hand, renal anatomy with presence of accessory artery was the only predictor to failed RAE (p=0.001). Failed RAE trial was a predictor for nephrectomy as a secondary procedure (p=0.03). Conclusion: No pre-procedural predictors could anticipate the RAE outcome, and different indications can be scheduled to RAE, which is equally effective. The presence of accessory renal artery on diagnostic angiography is the only factor that may predict the failure of the procedure.
|
Received: 11 July 2020
Available online: 20 April 2022
|
Corresponding Authors:
Mohamed Mohamed Elawdy,Ali Elsorougy,Abdalla Abdelhamid,Tarek Mohsen,Tarek El-Diasty
E-mail: mmelawdy@gmail.com
|
|
|
Parameter | Valuea | Gender, n (%) | Male | 105 (71) | Female | 43 (29) | Presentation, n (%) | Hematuria | 109 (74) | Pain | 34 (23) | Shock | 4 (2) | Incidentally-discovered | 1 (1) | Indication, n (%) | Iatrogenic | 89 (60) | PCNL | 62 (42) | Open surgery | 19 (13) | PCN and renal biopsy | 8 (5) | Trauma | 20 (14) | Blunt | 14 (9) | Penetrating | 6 (4) | Tumor | 31 (21) | AML | 13 (9) | RCC | 18 (12) | Spontaneous | 8 (5) | Ageb, year | 45±15 | BMIb, kg/m2 | 23.0±2.4 | Pre-procedural Hbb, g/dL | 10.5±2.5 | Prothrombin levelb, % | 85±15 | Platelet countb, 109/L | 280±70 | Pre-procedural Crc, mg/dL | 1.3 (0.6-2.2) | Post-procedural Crc, mg/dL | 1.8 (1.0-2.7) |
|
Patients’ demographics (N=148).
|
Variable | Outcome (N=148) | p-Value | Successful (n=136) | Unsuccessful (n=12) | Gendera, n (%) | | | 0.7 | Male | 97 (92) | 8 (8) | Female | 39 (91) | 4 (9) | Side of the lesiona, n (%) | | | 0.9 | Right | 59 (92) | 5 (8) | Left | 75 (91) | 7 (9) | Bilateral | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | Heamaturia prior to RAEa, n (%) | | | 0.7 | No | 29 (91) | 3 (9) | Yes | 107 (92) | 9 (8) | Indication of embolizationa, n (%) | | | 0.9 | Trauma | 18 (90) | 2 (10) | Iatrogenic | 82 (92) | 7 (8) | Tumor | 29 (94) | 2 (6) | Spontaneous | 7 (88) | 1 (12) | Type of the lesions (by diagnostic angiography)a, n (%) | | | 0.9 | Pseudoaneurysm | 74 (92) | 6 (8) | A-V fistula | 20 (87) | 3 (13) | Both (pseudoaneurysmand A-V fistula) | 17 (94) | 1 (6) | Tumor | 15 (88) | 2 (12) | Others | 10 (100) | 0 (0) | Renal artery anatomya, n (%) | | | 0.001 | Single | 124 (94) | 8 (6) | With accessory | 12 (75) | 4 (25) | Ageb, year | 45.5±11.5 | 44.6±16.7 | 0.8 | Body mass indexb, kg/m2 | 24.5±4.4 | 22.5±4.3 | 0.1 | Pre-procedural Hbb, g/dL | 10.9±2.8 | 10.4±2.3 | 0.4 |
|
Bivariate analysis between different predictors and the outcome.
|
|
Left renal angioembolization in a 13-year-old male patient with recurrent attacks of hematuria after accidental renal trauma. (A) Selective left main renal artery angiography by cobra head catheter showed normal intra renal arteries with no evidence of vascular abnormalities. There was an accessory renal artery seen arising from aorta below the main renal artery (arrow). (B) Selective angiography of the accessory left renal artery showed small upper polar contrast filled cavity representing pseudoaneurysm (arrow).
|
[1] |
Hotaling JM, Sorensen MD, Smith 3rd TG, Rivara FP, Wessells H, Voelzke BB. Analysis of diagnostic angiography and angioembolization in the acute management of renal trauma using a national data set. J Urol 2011; 185:1316-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.003
pmid: 21334643
|
[2] |
Mao Q, Wang C, Chen G, Tan F, Shen B. Failure of initial superselective renal arterial embolization in the treatment of renal hemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A respective analysis of risk factors. Exp Ther Med 2019; 18:4151-6.
|
[3] |
Yanagi M, Suzuki Y, Hamasaki T, Mizunuma K, Arai M, Yokota H, et al. Early transcatheter arterial embolization for the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 4 blunt renal trauma in two institutions. J Nippon Med Sch 2018; 85: 204-7.
doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2018_85-31
|
[4] |
Muller A, Rouvière O. Renal artery embolizationdindications, technical approaches and outcomes. Nat Rev Nephrol 2015; 11: 288-301.
doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.231
|
[5] |
Ginat DT, Saad WE, Turba UC. Transcatheter renal artery embolization: Clinical applications and techniques. Tech Vasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 12:224-39.
doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2009.09.007
|
[6] |
Schwartz MJ, Smith EB, Trost DW, Vaughan Jr ED. Renal artery embolization: Clinical indications and experience from over 100 cases. BJU Int 2007; 99:881-6.
|
[7] |
Desai D, Ong M, Lah K, Clouston J, Pearch B, Gianduzzo T. Outcome of angioembolization for blunt renal trauma in haemodynamically unstable patients: 10-year analysis of Queensland public hospitals. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:1705-9.
doi: 10.1111/ans.16204
|
[8] |
Ballon-Landa E, Raheem OA, Fuller TW, Kobayashi L, Buckley JC. Renal trauma classification and management: Validating the revised renal injury grading scale. J Urol 2019; 202:994-1000.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000358
pmid: 31144592
|
[9] |
Pappas P, Leonardou P, Papadoukakis S, Zavos G, Michail S, Boletis J, et al. Urgent superselective segmental renal artery embolization in the treatment of life-threatening renal hemorrhage. Urol Int 2006; 77:34-41.
pmid: 16825813
|
[10] |
Huber J, Pahernik S, Hallscheidt P, Sommer CM, Wagener N, Hatiboglu G, et al. Selective transarterial embolization for posttraumatic renal hemorrhage: A second try is worthwhile. J Urol 2011; 185:1751-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.045
|
[11] |
Breyer BN, McAninch JW, Elliott SP, Master VA. Minimally invasive endovascular techniques to treat acute renal hemorrhage. J Urol 2008; 179:2248-52; discussion 2253.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.104
|
[12] |
Rao D, Yu H, Zhu H, Yu K, Hu X, Xie L. Superselective transcatheter renal artery embolization for the treatment of hemorrhage from non-iatrogenic blunt renal trauma: Report of 16 clinical cases. Therapeut Clin Risk Manag 2014; 10:455-8.
|
[13] |
Jain V, Ganpule A, Vyas J, Muthu V, Sabnis RB, Rajapurkar MM, et al. Management of non-neoplastic renal hemorrhage by transarterial embolization. Urology 2009; 74:522-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.062
|
[14] |
Famurewa OC, Asaleye CM, Ibitoye BO, Ayoola OO, Aderibigbe AS, Badmus TA. Variations of renal vascular anatomy in a Nigerian population: A computerized tomography studys. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21:840-6.
doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_237_17
pmid: 29984713
|
[15] |
Sauk S, Zuckerman DA. Renal artery embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011; 28:396-406.
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296082
|
[16] |
Bishay VL, Crino PB, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB, Trerotola SO, Soulen MC, et al. Embolization of giant renal angiomyolipomas: Technique and results. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 21: 67-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.09.020
|
[17] |
Bakal CW, Cynamon J, Lakritz PS, Sprayregen S. Value of preoperative renal artery embolization in reducing blood transfusion requirements during nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1993; 4:727-31.
doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(93)71958-2
|
[18] |
El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, Mohsen T, Gad H, el-Assmy AM, el- Diasty T, et al. Functional and morphological effects of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy superselective renal angiographic embolization. Urology 2008; 71:408-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.033
pmid: 18342174
|
[1] |
Kevin J. Hebert,Brian J. Linder,Griffin T. Morrisson,Laureano Rangel Latuche,Daniel S. Elliott. A comparison of artificial urinary sphincter outcomes after primary implantation and first revision surgery[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(3): 298-302. |
[2] |
Alexandria M. Hertz,Andrew W. Stamm,Mark I. Anderson,Karen C. Baker. Impact of surgical volume and resident involvement on patency rates after vasectomy reversal—A 14-year experience in an open access system[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(2): 197-203. |
[3] |
Santosh Dey,Venkat Shankar Raman,Tarun Peela,Karunesh Chand,Naveen Chandra. Comparison of outcomes between 2 week versus 4 week stenting in pediatric pyeloplasty—A single centre observational study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(4): 327-331. |
[4] |
Issam Kably,Alexander Bode. Intractable hematuria due to giant prostatic hyperplasia effectively treated with prostatic artery embolization[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(3): 318-321. |
[5] |
Guangju Ge,Zhenghui Wang,Mingchao Wang,Gonghui Li,Zuhao Xu,Yukun Wang,Shawpong Wan. Inadvertent insertion of nephrostomy tube into the renal vein following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A case report and literature review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 64-67. |
[6] |
Najib Isse Dirie,Shaogang Wang. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in adults: A single surgeon experience and literature review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 37-44. |
[7] |
Gild Philipp,A. Kluth Luis,W. Vetterlein Malte,Engel Oliver,K.H. Chun Felix,Fisch Margit. Adult iatrogenic ureteral injury and stricture-incidence and treatment strategies[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(2): 101-106. |
[8] |
Per-Anders Abrahamsson. Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer:Connecting the dots[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(4): 208-222. |
[9] |
Ricardo Palmerola, Vinay Patel, Christopher Hartman, Chris Sung, David Hoenig, Arthur D. Smith, Zeph Okeke. Renal functional outcomes are not adversely affected by selective angioembolization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(1): 27-30. |
[10] |
Preeya K. Mistry, Geoffrey S. Gaunay, David M. Hoenig. Prediction of surgical complications in the elderly: Can we improve outcomes?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(1): 44-49. |
|
|
|
|