Please wait a minute...
Search Asian J Urol Advanced Search
Share 
Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 215-225    doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.12.001
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
Radiation protection measures during endourological therapies
Lazaros Tzelvesab*(),Patrick Juliebø-Jonesbc,Ioannis Manolitsisa,Themistoklis Bellosa,Ioannis Mykoniatisbd,Marinos Berdempesa,Titos Markopoulosa,Michael Lardasa,Belthangady M. Zeeshan Hameedbe,Panagiotis Angelopoulosa,Amelia Pietropaolof,Bhaskar Somanif,Ioannis Varkarakisa,Andreas Skolarikosa
a 2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece
b Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, the Netherlands
c Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
d Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
e Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India
f Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
下载:  HTML  PDF (523KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract: 

Objective The objective of this narrative review was to search the existing literature for studies reporting measures to minimize radiation use during endoscopic management of stone disease and present ways of reducing the exposure of both patients and operating room staff.
Methods A literature review in PubMed was performed to identify studies describing protocols or measures to reduce radiation received during endourological procedures from January 1970 to August 2022. Eligible studies were those that reported outcomes for ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotripsy regarding measures to minimize radiation doses used intraoperatively, performed either in real-life theatres or using phantoms. Both comparative and non-comparative studies were deemed eligible.
Results Protection can be achieved initially at the level of diagnosis and follow-up of patients, which should be done following an algorithm and choice of more conservative imaging methods. Certain protocols, which follow principles for minimized fluoroscopy use should be implemented and urologists as well as operating room staff should be continuously trained regarding radiation damage and protection measures. Wearing protective lead equipment remains a cornerstone for personnel protection, while configuration of the operating room and adjusting X-ray machine settings can also significantly reduce radiation energy.
Conclusion There are specific measures, which can be implemented to reduce radiation exposure. These include avoiding excessive use of computed tomography scans and X-rays during diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis patients. Intraoperative protocols with minimal fluoroscopy use can be employed. Staff training regarding dangers of radiation plays also a major role. Use and maintenance of protective equipment and setting up the operating room properly also serve towards this goal. Machine settings can be customized appropriately and finally continuously monitoring of exposure with dosimeters can be adopted.

Key words:  Endourology    Radiation    Fluoroless ureteroscopy    Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy    As low as reasonably achievable
收稿日期:  2022-09-26           接受日期:  2022-12-13           发布日期:  2023-08-11      整期出版日期:  2023-07-20
引用本文:    
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 215-225.
Lazaros Tzelves,Patrick Juliebø-Jones,Ioannis Manolitsis,Themistoklis Bellos,Ioannis Mykoniatis,Marinos Berdempes,Titos Markopoulos,Michael Lardas,Belthangady M. Zeeshan Hameed,Panagiotis Angelopoulos,Amelia Pietropaolo,Bhaskar Somani,Ioannis Varkarakis,Andreas Skolarikos. Radiation protection measures during endourological therapies. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 215-225.
链接本文:  
http://www.ajurology.com/CN/10.1016/j.ajur.2022.12.001  或          http://www.ajurology.com/CN/Y2023/V10/I3/215
Setting Specific steps to follow
Diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis patients ·-
Use of low-dose CT protocols, especially for patients with BMI of <30 kg/m2
·-
Follow-up patients according to their risk for recurrence and residual stone burden; consider European Association of Urology follow-up algorithm
Ureteroscopy ·-
Estimate stone and kidney location by C-arm laser and avoid use of fluoroscopy
·-
Place guidewires and double-J stents using anatomic landmarks and tactile feedback
·-
Use hydrophilic, soft-tip guidewires
·-
Synchronize use of fluoroscopy with patient respiration
·-
Assess preoperative imaging in detail to delineate patient anatomy and stone characteristics
·-
Choose ureteric access sheath according to patient height
·-
Confirm guidewire placement using a semirigid ureteroscope in case of doubt
·-
Assess stone clearance visually when possible
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy ·-
Estimate stone and kidney location by C-arm laser and avoid use of fluoroscopy
·-
Use hydrophilic, soft-tip guidewires
·-
Synchronize use of fluoroscopy with patient respiration
·-
Assess preoperative imaging in detail to delineate patient anatomy and stone characteristics
·-
Use ultrasound for renal puncture either as the only guidance or at least adjunctively to X-ray
·-
Take advantage of direct visual feedback with flexible ureteroscope in cases of ECIRS to guide renal puncture with minimal fluoroscopy
·-
Consider use of balloon instead of serial dilators to minimize fluoroscopy time
Setting of operating room ·-
Monitor use of fluoroscopy
·-
Use alarms
·-
Use protective equipment (aprons, thyroid shields, glasses)
·-
Ensure proper protective equipment maintenance and storage
·-
Cooperate with technician if possible
·-
Ensure proper positioning of patient and avoid interference between target area and X-ray beam
·-
Staff should stand as far as possible from X-ray source
·X-ray machine settings ·-
Use pulsed instead of continuous fluoroscopy
·-
Make use of last-image hold option
·-
Avoid using pre-established settings of mAs and kVps and lower the settings, especially in patients with normal BMI
·-
Use collimation to minimize scattered energy
·-
Use image magnification when suitable
  
[1] Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012; 62:160-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052 pmid: 22498635
[2] Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petrik A, Somani B, Thomas K, Gambaro G, et al. EAU urolithiasis guidelines. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis. [Accessed 17 December 2022].
[3] Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol 2013; 189:1203-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031 pmid: 23085059
[4] Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191:396-401.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3414
[5] Vassileva J, Zagorska A, Basic D, Karagiannis A, Petkova K, Sabuncu K, et al. Radiation exposure of patients during endourological procedures: IAEA-SEGUR study. J Radiol Prot 2020; 40. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/abc351.
[6] Vassileva J, Zagorska A, Karagiannis A, Petkova K, Sabuncu K, Saltirov I, et al. Radiation exposure of surgical team during endourological procedures: International Atomic Energy AgencyeSouth-Eastern European Group for urolithiasis research study. J Endourol 2021; 35:574-82.
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0630
[7] Fahmy NM, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Effective radiation exposure in evaluation and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis. Urology 2012; 79:43-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1387 pmid: 21940040
[8] Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, Scales CD Jr, Rampersaud E, Pearle MS, et al. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol 2009; 181:668-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.012 pmid: 19100573
[9] Tzelves L, Türk C, Skolarikos A. European Association of Urology Urolithiasis guidelines: where are we going? Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7:34-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.011 pmid: 33011151
[10] Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Lombardo R, Davis NF, Pet?ík A, Neisius A, et al. Duration of follow-up and timing of discharge from imaging follow-up, in adult patients with urolithiasis after surgical or medical intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology guideline panel on urolithiasis. Eur Urol Focus 2023;9:188-98.
[11] Lombardo R, Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Davis NF, Neisius A, Pet?ík A, et al. What is the ideal follow up after kidney stone treatment? A systematic review and follow-up algorithm from the European Association of Urology urolithiasis panel. Eur Urol 81(Suppl. 1): S1542-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(22)01125-3.
[12] Tzelves L, Berdempes M, Mourmouris P, Mitsogiannis I, Skolarikos A. Optimal delivery of follow-up care for the prevention of stone recurrence in urolithiasis patients: improving outcomes. Res Rep Urol 2022; 14:141-8.
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S277498 pmid: 35469244
[13] Tzelves L, Mourmouris P, Skolarikos A. Comparison of current guidelines on medical management of stone disease. Arch Esp Urol 2021; 74:171-82.
pmid: 33459633
[14] Reisz JA, Bansal N, Qian J, Zhao W, Furdui CM. Effects of ionizing radiation on biological moleculesdmechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection. Antioxidants Redox Signal 2014; 21:260-92.
doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5489
[15] Mahesh M. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics 2001; 21:1033-45.
doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl271033 pmid: 11452079
[16] Berrington de González A. Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004;363:345-51.
[17] Authors on behalf of ICRP, Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organsdthreshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 2012; 41:1-322.
[18] Manzo BO, Lozada E, Manzo G, Sánchez HM, Gomez F, Figueroa A, et al. Radiation-free flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment. Arab J Urol 2019; 17:200-5.
doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1606381
[19] Hager SP, Balouch B, Desai S, Buckley M, Amster M, Belkoff L, et al. Factors influencing fluoroscopy use during ureteroscopy at a residency training program. J Endourol 2021; 35:25-9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0333
[20] The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37: 1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003
[21] Hsi RS, Zamora DA, Kanal KM, Harper JD. Severe obesity is associated with 3-fold higher radiation dose rate during ureteroscopy. Urology 2013; 82:780-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.030 pmid: 23958504
[22] Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, Lombardo R, Yuan C, Thomas K, et al. Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: an update from the European Association of Urology guidelines panel for urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:199-208.
[23] Kokorowski PJ, Chow JS, Strauss K, Pennison M, Routh JC, Nelson CP. Prospective measurement of patient exposure to radiation during pediatric ureteroscopy. J Urol 2012; 187: 1408-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.013 pmid: 22341275
[24] Jamal JE, Armenakas NA, Sosa RE, Fracchia JA. Perioperative patient radiation exposure in the endoscopic removal of upper urinary tract calculi. J Endourol 2011; 25:1747-51.
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0695 pmid: 22010880
[25] Bagley DH, Cubler-Goodman A. Radiation exposure during ureteroscopy. J Urol 1990; 144:1356-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39739-2 pmid: 2231925
[26] Rebuck DA, Coleman S, Chen JF, Casey JT, Perry KT, Nadler RB. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy: a comparison of intraoperative radiation exposure during the management of nephrolithiasis. J Endourol 2012; 26:597-601.
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0185 pmid: 21970366
[27] Greene DJ, Tenggadjaja CF, Bowman RJ, Agarwal G, Ebrahimi KY, Baldwin DD. Comparison of a reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol to conventional fluoroscopy during uncomplicated ureteroscopy. Urology 2011; 78:286-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.020 pmid: 21256553
[28] Danilovic A, Nunes E, Lipkin ME, Ferreira T, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS, et al. Low dose fluoroscopy during ureteroscopy does not compromise surgical outcomes. J Endourol 2019; 33: 527-32.
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0722 pmid: 30793920
[29] Tepeler A, Armagan A, Akman T, S?lay MS, Ak?ay M, Ba??büyük I, et al. Is fluoroscopic imaging mandatory for endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones? Urology 2012;80:1002-6.
[30] Hsi RS, Harper JD. Fluoroless ureteroscopy: zero-dose fluoroscopy during ureteroscopic treatment of urinary-tract calculi. J Endourol 2013; 27:432-7.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0478 pmid: 23194092
[31] Olgin G, Smith D, Alsyouf M, Arenas JL, Engebretsen S, Huang G, et al. Ureteroscopy without fluoroscopy: a feasibility study and comparison with conventional ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2015; 29:625-9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0237 pmid: 25562139
[32] Deters LA, Dagrosa LM, Herrick BW, Silas A, Pais Jr VM. Ultrasound guided ureteroscopy for the definitive management of ureteral stones: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2014; 192:1710-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.073 pmid: 24977321
[33] Hein S, Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Schlager D, Vach W, Wetterauer U, et al. Ultralow radiation exposure during flexible ureteroscopy in patients with nephrolithiasisdhow far can we go? Urology 2017; 108:34-9.
[34] Hein S, Wilhelm K, Miernik A, Schoenthaler M, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Gratzke C, et al. Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation. World J Urol 2021; 39:217-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03160-9
[35] Kirac M, Kopru B, Ergin G, Kibar Y, Biri H. Is fluoroscopy necessary during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones? Arab J Urol 2019; 18:112-7.
[36] Subiela JD, Kanashiro A, Emiliani E, Villegas S, Sánchez-Martín FM, Millán F, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis comparing fluoroless ureteroscopy and conventional ureteroscopy in the management of ureteral and renal stones. J Endourol 2021;35:417-28.
[37] Ayoub EM, Bourgi A, Alsouki J, Merhej S, Conort P. Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: a safe technique for experienced surgeons. Arab J Urol 2021; 19:438-44.
doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1901357
[38] Rao PN, Faulkner K, Sweeney JK, Asbury DL, Sambrook P, Blacklock NJ. Radiation dose to patient and staff during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Br J Urol 1987; 59:508-12.
pmid: 3690178
[39] Kumari G, Kumar P, Wadhwa P, Aron M, Gupta NP, Dogra PN. Radiation exposure to the patient and operating room personnel during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2006; 38:207-10.
pmid: 16868684
[40] Bowsher WG, Blott P, Whitfield HN. Radiation protection in percutaneous renal surgery. Br J Urol 1992; 69:231-3.
pmid: 1568094
[41] Safak M, Olgar T, Bor D, Berkmen G, Gogus C. Radiation doses of patients and urologists during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Radiol Prot 2009; 29:409-15.
doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/29/3/005 pmid: 19690355
[42] Mancini JG, Raymundo EM, Lipkin M, Zilberman D, Yong D, Ba?ez LL, et al. Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2010; 184: 2373-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.033 pmid: 20952034
[43] Lipkin ME, Preminger GM. Risk reduction strategy for radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol 2012; 22:139-43.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834fc36a pmid: 22228106
[44] Tepeler A, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Sari E, Kaba M, Muslumanoglu AY, et al. Factors affecting the fluoroscopic screening time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23:1825-9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0256 pmid: 19811060
[45] Lipkin ME, Mancini JG, Toncheva G, Wang AJ, Anderson-Evans C, Simmons WN, et al. Organ-specific radiation dose rates and effective dose rates during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2012; 26:439-43.
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0178 pmid: 21942800
[46] St-Laurent MP, Doizi S, Rosec M, Terrasa JB, Villa L, Traxer O, et al. Radiation exposure in prone vs. modified supine position during PCNL: results with an anthropomorphic model. Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 13:246-9.
[47] Andonian S, Scoffone CM, Louie MK, Gross AJ, Grabe M, Daels FPJ, et al. Does imaging modality used for percutaneous renal access make a difference? A matched case analysis. J Endourol 2013; 27:24-8.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0347 pmid: 22834999
[48] Agarwal M, Agrawal MS, Jaiswal A, Kumar D, Yadav H, Lavania P. Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct to fluoroscopy for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 2011; 108:1346-9.
[49] de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomyda critical review. Eur Urol 2008; 54:994-1001.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.052 pmid: 18394783
[50] Jagtap J, Mishra S, Bhattu A, Ganpule A, Sabnis R, Desai MR. Which is the preferred modality of renal access for a trainee urologist: ultrasonography or fluoroscopy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Endourol 2014; 28:1464-9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0229 pmid: 25393358
[51] Duncan JR, Panahipour S. Tissue attenuation of X-rays [Internet] 2014. http://imagewisely.org/imaging-modalities/fluoroscopy/articles/duncan-panahipour-tissue-attenuationof-x-rays. [Accessed 27 July 2022].
[52] Usawachintachit M, Masic S, Chang HC, Allen IE, Chi T. Ultrasound guidance to assist percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces radiation exposure in obese patients. Urology 2016; 98:32-8.
doi: S0090-4295(16)30107-8 pmid: 27112513
[53] Nowfar S, Palazzi-Churas K, Chang DC, Sur RL. The relationship of obesity and gender prevalence changes in United States inpatient nephrolithiasis. Urology 2011; 78:1029-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.011 pmid: 21676441
[54] Falahatkar S, Allahkhah A, Kazemzadeh M, Enshaei A, Shakiba M, Moghaddas F. Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial. Int Braz J Urol 2016; 42:710-6.
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0291 pmid: 27564281
[55] Sahan A, Cubuk A, Ozkaptan O, Ertas? K, Canakci C, Eryildirim B, et al. Safety of upper pole puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the guidance of ultrasonography versus fluoroscopy: a comparative study. Urol Int 2020; 104: 769-74.
doi: 10.1159/000509448 pmid: 32726775
[56] Chu C, Masic S, Usawachintachit M, Hu W, Yang W, Stoller M, et al. Ultrasound-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a description of three novel ultrasoundguided needle techniques. J Endourol 2016; 30:153-8.
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0185
[57] Hunter PT, Hawkins IF, Finlayson B, Nanni G, Senior D. Hawkins-Hunter retrograde transcutaneous nephrostomy: a new technique. Urology 1983; 22:583-7.
pmid: 6649222
[58] Munch LC. Direct-vision modified Lawson retrograde nephrostomy technique using flexible ureteroscope. J Endourol 1989; 3:411-7.
doi: 10.1089/end.1989.3.411
[59] Wynberg JB, Borin JF, Vicena JZ, Hannosh V, Salmon SA. Flexible ureteroscopy-directed retrograde nephrostomy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: description of a technique. J Endourol 2012; 26:1268-74.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0160 pmid: 22563900
[60] Lantz AG, O’Malley P, Ordon M, Lee JY. Assessing radiation exposure during endoscopic-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2014; 8:347-51.
[61] Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M. The "all-seeing needle": initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2011; 59:1054-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.026 pmid: 21477921
[62] Rassweiler JJ, Müller M, Fangerau M, Klein J, Goezen AS, Pereira P, et al. iPad-assisted percutaneous access to the kidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol 2012; 61:628-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.024 pmid: 22209052
[63] Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Michel MS. The Uro Dyna-CT enables three-dimensional planned laser-guided complex punctures. Eur Urol 2015; 68:880-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.005 pmid: 26213364
[64] Li R, Li T, Qian X, Qi J, Wu D, Liu J. Real-time ultrasonographyguided percutaneous nephrolithotomy using SonixGPS navigation: clinical experience and practice in a single center in China. J Endourol 2015; 29:158-61.
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0302
[65] Chau HL, Chan HCW, Li TBT, Cheung MHP, Lam KMJ, So HS. An innovative free-hand puncture technique to reduce radiation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy using ultrasound with navigation system under magnetic field: a single-center experience in Hong Kong. J Endourol 2016; 30:160-4.
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0296 pmid: 26414736
[66] Lima E, Rodrigues PL, Mota P, Carvalho N, Dias E, Correia-Pinto J, et al. Ureteroscopy-assisted percutaneous kidney access made easy: first clinical experience with a novel navigation system using electromagnetic guidance (IDEAL stage 1). Eur Urol 2017; 72:610-6.
[67] Rodrigues PL, Rodrigues NF, Fonseca J, Lima E, Vilac?a JL. Kidney targeting and puncturing during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: recent advances and future perspectives. J Endourol 2013; 27:826-34.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0740 pmid: 23488637
[68] Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Tang Y, Xiao B, Hu W, et al. Tract dilation monitored by ultrasound in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: feasible and safe. World J Urol 2020; 38: 1569-76.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02876-7 pmid: 31312892
[69] Yildirim B, Ates M, Karalar M, Akin Y, Keles I, Tuzel E. Effects of dilatation types during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for less radiation exposure: a matched-pair pilot study. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2016; 128:53-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0711-0 pmid: 25854903
[70] Blair B, Huang G, Arnold D, Li R, Schlaifer A, Anderson K, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy protocol for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: feasibility, outcomes and effects on fluoroscopy time. J Urol 2013; 190:2112-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.114 pmid: 23764072
[71] Sourial MW, Todd AM, Palettas MS, Knudsen BE. Reducing fluoroscopy time in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2019; 33:369-74.
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0837 pmid: 30838892
[72] Ngo TC, Macleod LC, Rosenstein DI, Reese JH, Shinghal R. Tracking intraoperative fluoroscopy utilization reduces radiation exposure during ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2011; 25:763-7.
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0624 pmid: 21388241
[73] Ritter M, Siegel F, Krombach P, Martinschek A, Weiss C, H?cker A, et al. Influence of surgeon’s experience on fluoroscopy time during endourological interventions. World J Urol 2013; 31:183-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0923-0 pmid: 22885617
[74] Weld LR, Nwoye UO, Knight RB, Baumgartner TS, Ebertowski JS, Stringer MT, et al. Safety, minimization, and awareness radiation training reduces fluoroscopy time during unilateral ureteroscopy. Urology 2014; 84:520-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.035 pmid: 24909957
[75] Weld LR, Nwoye UO, Knight RB, Baumgartner TS, Ebertowski JS, Stringer MT, et al. Fluoroscopy time during uncomplicated unilateral ureteroscopy for urolithiasis decreases with urology resident experience. World J Urol 2015; 33:119-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1264-y pmid: 24562314
[76] Sfoungaristos S, Lorber A, Gofrit ON, Yutkin V, Landau EH, Pode D, et al. Surgical experience gained during an endourology fellowship program may affect fluoroscopy time during ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis 2015; 43:369-74.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0774-4 pmid: 25894628
[77] Tzelves L, Somani B, Knoll T, Kamphuis G, Sarica K, Seitz C, et al. Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey. World J Urol 2020; 38: 761-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02807-6 pmid: 31093704
[78] Smith DL, Heldt JP, Richards GD, Agarwal G, Brisbane WG, Chen CJ, et al. Radiation exposure during continuous and pulsed fluoroscopy. J Endourol 2013; 27:384-8.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0213 pmid: 22966826
[79] Boland GW, Murphy B, Arellano R, Niklason L, Mueller PR. Dose reduction in gastrointestinal and genitourinary fluoroscopy: use of grid-controlled pulsed fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1453-7.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.5.1751453
[80] Ward VL, Barnewolt CE, Strauss KJ, Lebowitz RL, Venkatakrishnan V, Stehr M, et al. Radiation exposure reduction during voiding cystourethrography in a pediatric porcine model of vesicoureteral reflux. Radiology 2006; 238:96-106.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2381041433 pmid: 16373761
[81] Hahn H, F?rber D, Allmendinger H, Brendler J. Grid-controlled fluoroscopy in paediatric radiology 1997; 41:12-7.
[82] Elkoushy MA, Shahrour W, Andonian S. Pulsed fluoroscopy in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2012; 79:1230-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.027 pmid: 22465084
[83] Durutovic O, Dzamic Z, Milojevic B, Nikic P, Mimic A, Bumbasirevic U, et al. Pulsed versus continuous mode fluoroscopy during PCNL: safety and effectiveness comparison in a case series study. Urolithiasis 2016; 44:565-70.
pmid: 27126448
[84] Ritter M, Krombach P, Martinschek A, Siegel FP, Schmitt M, Weiss C, et al. Radiation exposure during endourologic procedures using over-the-table fluoroscopy sources. J Endourol 2012; 26:47-51.
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0333 pmid: 22003848
[85] Cabrera FJ, Shin RH, Waisanen KM, Nguyen G, Wang C, Scales CD, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure from fixed table fluoroscopy to a portable C-arm during ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2017; 31:835-40.
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0240 pmid: 28622024
[86] Setterfield J, Watterson J, Playfair M, Lavallée LT, Roberts M, Blew B, et al. Should surgeons control fluoroscopy during urology procedures? Can Urol Assoc J 2016; 10:398-402.
[87] Henderickx MMEL, Brits T, Zabegalina NS, Baard J, Ballout M, Beerlage HP, et al. Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy? Cent European J Urol 2022; 75:90-5.
[88] Kim CH, Kim SJ, Kim MH, Kim KT, Oh JK, Chung KJ, et al. Are urologists performing semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy safe from radiation exposure? A guidance to reduce the radiation dose. Urology 2016; 95:54-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.001 pmid: 27289024
[89] Doizi S, Audouin M, Villa L, Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero M, De Coninck V, Keller EX, et al. The eye of the endourologist: what are the risks? A review of the literature. World J Urol 2019; 37: 2639-47.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02667-0 pmid: 30737574
[90] Yang RM, Morgan T, Bellman GC. Radiation protection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new urologic surgery radiation shield. J Endourol 2002; 16:727e31.
[91] Inoue T, Komemushi A, Murota T, Yoshida T, Taguchi M, Kinoshita H, et al. Effect of protective lead curtains on scattered radiation exposure to the operator during ureteroscopy for stone disease: a controlled trial. Urology 2017; 109:60-6.
doi: S0090-4295(17)30786-0 pmid: 28780299
[92] Emiliani E, Kanashiro A, Chi T, Pérez-Fentes DA, Manzo BO, Angerri O, et al. Fluoroless endourological surgery for stone disease: a review of the literature-tips and tricks. Curr Urol Rep 2020; 21:27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-00979-y.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00979-y pmid: 32444987
No related articles found!
[1] Sagar Patel, Judy Hamad, Matthew E. Nielsen, Steven Johnson. Management and evaluation of bladder paragangliomas[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(1): 94 -96 .
[2] Maryam Emami,Pejman Shadpour,Koosha Kamali,Nima Narimani,Jalil Hosseini. Female anterior wall onlay urethroplasty with lower lip buccal mucosal graft: Importance of the laterally extended incision[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(1): 33 -38 .
[3] Kelly Lehner,Catherine Ingram,Utsav Bansal,Colleen Baca,Adithya Balasubramanian,Nannan Thirumavalavan,Jason M. Scovell,Saneal Rajanahally,Matthew Pollard,Larry I. Lipshultz. Color Doppler ultrasound imaging in varicoceles: Is the difference in venous diameter encountered during Valsalva predictive of palpable varicocele grade?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(1): 27 -32 .
[4] Ponco Birowo,Nur Rasyid,Chaidir A. Mochtar,Bambang S. Noegroho,H.R. Danarto,Besut Daryanto,Lukman Hakim,Dyandra Parikesit,Fakhri Rahman,S. Cahyo Ariwicaksono. Daily activities and training experiences of urology residents during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Indonesia: A nationwide survey[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(2): 119 -127 .
[5] Tarun Jindal, Pravin Pawar, Neeraj Subedi. Concurrent laparoscopic management of giant adrenal myelolipoma and contralateral renal cell carcinoma[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, 9(1): 97 -98 .
[6] Bendu K. Konneh, John T. Lafin, Aditya Bagrodia. Referring to the article published on pp. 400-406 of this issue: Progress and challenges in testicular cancer microRNAs[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 341 -342 .
[7] Edward K. Chang,Adam J. Gadzinski,Yaw A. Nyame. Blood and urine biomarkers in prostate cancer: Are we ready for reflex testing in men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 343 -353 .
[8] Luke P. O’Connor,Shayann Ramedani,Michael Daneshvar,Arvin K. George,Andre Luis Abreu,Giovanni E. Cacciamani,Amir H. Lebastchi. Future perspective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 354 -361 .
[9] Shuchi Gulati,Nicholas J. Vogelzang. Biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma: Are we there yet?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 362 -375 .
[10] Francesco Claps,Maria Carmen Mir,Homayoun Zargar. Molecular markers of systemic therapy response in urothelial carcinoma[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 376 -390 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed