a Department of Urology, Ninth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China b Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Objective: In second-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), because the hydronephrosis has been decompressed, the dilated renal pelvis has resolved and the space is small. Consequently, introduction of the tip of the Amplatz dilator can cause injury to the opposite side of the renal-pelvic mucosa. In this study, we report the experimental and initial clinical performance of a spherical-headed fascial dilator developed specifically for second-stage PCNL. Methods: The novel spherical-headed dilator was compared with existing tapered-headed dilators in configuration and in puncture resistance utilizing a static puncture test. Subsequently, a pilot clinical study was conducted during which patients scheduled to undergo second-stage PCNL from June 2019 to October 2019 in our center were enrolled. A typical ultrasound guided PCNL procedure was performed with the exception that the new spherical-headed fascial dilator was substituted for a tapered-headed one. Results: Experimentally, stab resistance against polyethylene film was significantly increased using the novel spherical-headed dilator compared to the traditional tapered-headed dilators (p<0.005). In the clinical study, the novel dilators were successfully introduced into the renal pelvis and passed down the collecting system in all eight second-stage PCNL cases. There were no cases of renal pelvic perforation or brisk hemorrhage nor need for transfusion. Conclusion: The design of the novel spherical-headed fascial dilator avoided the concentration of pressure at the tapered tip of the current Amplatz dilator by increasing the contact area and uniformly distributing and diffusing the pressure. Therefore, it is feasible to use the spherical-headed fascial dilator for second-stage PCNL.
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 424-429.
Yiwei Wang, Liheng Gao, Mingxi Xu, Wenfeng Li, Yuanshen Mao, Fujun Wang, Lu Wang, Jun Da, Zhong Wang. A novel spherical-headed fascial dilator is feasible for second-stage ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A pilot study. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 424-429.
Time between the two procedures, mean (range), week
3.1 (2-4)
Preoperativeblood hemoglobin concentration, mean (range), g/L
134 (128-143)
Postoperative blood hemoglobin concentration, mean (range), g/L
132 (122-142)
Operative time, mean (range), min
50 (35-72)
Postoperative hospital stay, mean (range), day
1.6 (1-3)
Clavien II-IV complication rate, %
0
Urinary leakage, n
0
[1]
Ahmad AA, Alhunaidi O, Aziz M, Omar M, Al-Kandari AM, El-Nahas A, et al. Current trends in percutaneous neph-rolithotomy: An internet-based survey. Ther Adv Urol 2017; 9:219e26.
[2]
Kumar S, Karthikeyan VS, Mallya A, Keshavamurthy R. Out-comes of second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal calculidasingle centre experience. Turk J Urol 2018; 44:406e10.
[3]
Davol PE, Wood C, Fulmer B. Success in treating renal calculi with single-access, single-event percutaneous neph-rolithotomy: Is a routine "second look" necessary? J Endourol 2006; 20:289e92.
[4]
Zhang Z, Wang X, Chen D, Peng N, Chen J, Wang Q, et al. Minimally invasive management of acute ureteral obstruction and severe infection caused by upper urinary tract calculi. J X Ray Sci Technol 2020; 28:125e35.
[5]
Handa RK, Johnson CD, Connors BA, Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Liu Z. Percutaneous renal access: Surgical factors involved in the acute reduction of renal function. J Endourol 2016; 30:178e83.
[6]
Armas-Phan M, Tzou DT, Bayne DB, Wiener SV, Stoller ML, Chi T. Ultrasound guidance can be used safely for renal tract dilatation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 2020; 125:284e91.
[7]
Zhou M, He X, Zhang Y, Yu W. Optical puncture combined with balloon dilation PCNL vs. conventional puncture dilation PCNL for kidney stones without hydronephrosis: A retrospective study. BMC Urol 2019;19:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0558-1.
[8]
Armitage JN, Withington J, Fowler S, Finch WJG, Burgess NA, Irving SO, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy access by urologist or interventional radiologist: Practice and outcomes in the UK. BJU Int 2017; 119:913e8.
[9]
Lipkin ME, Mancini JG, Toncheva G, Wang AJ, Anderson-Evans C, Simmons WN, et al. Organ-specific radia-tion dose rates and effective dose rates during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2012; 26:439e43.
[10]
Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Wu K, Chen W, Wu W, et al. Evalu-ation of a novel fascial dilator modified with scale marker in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for reducing the X-ray exposure: A randomized clinical study. J Endourol 2013; 27:1335e40.
[11]
Gamal WM, Hussein M, Aldahshoury M, Hammady A, Osman M, Moursy E, et al. Solo ultrasonography-guided percutanous nephrolithotomy for single stone pelvis. J Endourol 2011; 25:593e6.
Abdel Raheem Ali,Yahya Ghazwani,Ibrahim Alowidah,Raed A. Azhar,Mohammed Alomar,Ahmed Alzahrani,Ossamah Alsowayan,Wissam Kamal,Abdulrahman Alalayet,Ahmad Bugis,Abdulaziz M. Althunayan,M. Alzahrani Tarek,Kamel Fadaak,Aiman Al-Solumany,Saeed Bin Hamri. Impact of COVID-19 on endourology surgical practice in Saudi Arabia: A national multicenter study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 416
-423
.