Impact of COVID-19 on endourology surgical practice in Saudi Arabia: A national multicenter study
Abdel Raheem Aliab*(),Yahya Ghazwanic,Ibrahim Alowidaha,Raed A. Azhard,Mohammed Alomare,Ahmed Alzahranif,Ossamah Alsowayang,Wissam Kamalh,Abdulrahman Alalayeta,Ahmad Bugisd,Abdulaziz M. Althunayane,M. Alzahrani Tarekf,Kamel Fadaakg,Aiman Al-Solumanyh,Saeed Bin Hamric
a Urology Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia b Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt c Devision of Urology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia d Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia e Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia f Urology Department, Price Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia g Urology Department, King Fahd Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia h Urology Department, King Fahd Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Objective: To identify the impact of COVID-19 on endourology surgical practice in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A retrospective study of seven tertiary hospitals from January 2019 to April 2019, and from January 2020 to April 2020 was performed. Records of urology outpatient department (OPD) visits and endourology procedures in the first third of 2020 were analyzed and compared with those in the first third of 2019, as well as, during the full curfew time, i.e. April 2020 versus April 2019. Results: Number of OPD visits in the first third of 2020 and 2019 were 19 499 and 26 594, respectively (p<0.001). Number of OPD visits in April 2020 was 1512, with a 78.6% decrease compared to that in April 2019, and among them 1373 (90.8%) were teleclinics. Number of elective procedures in the first third of 2020 has decreased by 34.3% (from 3025 to 1988) compared to that in the first third of 2019 (p<0.001). There were 120 elective procedures in April 2020, 84.1% lower than that in April 2019. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shockwave lithotripsy, and transurethral resection of prostate procedures declined by 94.2%, 98.5%, and 93.8%, respectively. Most procedures were performed as day surgery (85.0%). Number of emergency procedures in 2020 have fallen by 9.3% compared to 2019 (p=0.286). Urolithiasis was the commonest pathology (52.6%) presented to the emergency room (52.6%). Conclusion: During COVID-19 pandemic, urology services slashed by >75%, including OPD visits and elective endourology procedures. Most hospitals have changed their strategic preventive measures by increasing the rate of teleclinics and day surgeries.
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 416-423.
Abdel Raheem Ali,Yahya Ghazwani,Ibrahim Alowidah,Raed A. Azhar,Mohammed Alomar,Ahmed Alzahrani,Ossamah Alsowayan,Wissam Kamal,Abdulrahman Alalayet,Ahmad Bugis,Abdulaziz M. Althunayan,M. Alzahrani Tarek,Kamel Fadaak,Aiman Al-Solumany,Saeed Bin Hamri. Impact of COVID-19 on endourology surgical practice in Saudi Arabia: A national multicenter study. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(4): 416-423.
Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed 2020; 91:157e60.
[2]
World Health Organization. WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard data last updated: 2020/7/14, 2:17pm CEST. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. [Accessed 23 June 2020] [Google Scholar].
[3]
Wilder-Smith A, Freedman DO. Isolation, quarantine, social distancing, and community containment: Pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. J Trav Med 2020;13:27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa020.taaa020.
[4]
Puliatti S, Eissa A, Eissa R, Amato M, Mazzone E, Dell’Oglio P, et al. COVID-19 and urology: A comprehensive review of the literature. BJU Int 2020; 125:7e14.
[5]
Ribal MJ, Cornford P, Briganti A, Knolld T, Gravase S, Babjuk M, et al. European association of urology guidelines office rapid reaction group: An organisation-wide collabora-tive effort to adapt the European association of urology guidelines recommendations to the coronavirus disease 2019 era. Eur Urol 2020; 78:21e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.015
[6]
Metzler IS, Sorensen MD, Sweet RM, Harper JD. Stone care triage during COVID-19 at the University of Washington. J Endourol 2020; 34:539e40.
[7]
Tefik T, Guven S, Villa L, Gokce MI, Kallidonis P, Petkova K, et al. Urolithiasis practice patterns following the COVID-19 pandemic: Overview from the EULIS collaborative research working group. Eur Urol 2020;78:e21e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.057.
[8]
Goldman HB, Haber GP. Recommendations for tiered stratifi-cation of urological surgery urgency in the COVID-19 era. J Urol 2020; 204:11e3.
[9]
Stensland KD, Morgan TM, Moinzadeh A, Lee CT, Briganti CA, Catto JWF, et al. Considerations in the triage of urologic surgeries during the covid-19 pandemic. Eur Urol 2020; 77:663e6.
[10]
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhao X, Li X, Wang P, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. J Am Med Assoc 2020; 323:1061e9.
[11]
Terry K. Hospital volumes slashed by more than half during pandemic. Medsc Med News 2020; May 11. Available at: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/930345. [Accessed 23 June 2020].
[12]
Naspro R, Da Pozzo LF. Urology in the time of corona. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:251e3.
[13]
Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1679e81.
[14]
Smith AC, Thomas E, Snoswell CL, Haydon H, Mehrotra A, Clemensen J, et al. Telehealth for global emergencies: Im-plications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19). J Telemed Telecare 2020; 26:309e13.
[15]
Katz EG, Stensland KS, Mandeville JA, MacLachlan LS, Moinzadeh A, Sorcini A, et al. Triaging office-based urology pro-cedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Urol 2020; 204:9e10.
[16]
Heldwein FL, Loeb S, Wroclawski ML, Sridhar AN, Carneiro A, Lima FS, et al. A Systematic review on guidelines and rec-ommendations for urology standard of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 6:1070e85.
[17]
Fukushima H, Kobayashi M, Kawano K, Morimoto S. Perfor-mance of quick sequential (sepsis related) and sequential (sepsis related) organ failure assessment to predict mortality in patients with acute pyelonephritis associated with upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol 2018; 199:1526e33.
[18]
Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX, McClinton S, Nabi G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus uretero-scopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;16:CD006029. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4.
[19]
Boeri L, Soligo M, Frank I, Boorjian SA, Thompson H, Tollefson M, et al. Delaying radical cystectomy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer is associated with adverse survival outcomes. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 2:390e6.
[20]
Gore JL, Lai J, Setodji CM, Litwin MS, Saigal CS. Mortality increases when radical cystectomy is delayed more than 12 weeks: Results from a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare analysis. Cancer 2009; 115:988e96.
[21]
Desouky E. Urology in the era of COVID-19: Mass casualty triage. Urol Pract 2020; 7:266e71.
[22]
Zehnder P, Thalmann G. Timing and outcomes for radical cystectomy in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2013; 23:423e8.
[23]
Coronavirus update (live). Last updated: July 14, 2020, 18:39 GMT, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/saudi-arabia/. [Accessed 23 June 2020].
