Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the fluoroscopy-free single-use flexible ureteroscopy procedure in the treatment of kidney stones with abnormal renal anatomy compared to normal renal anatomy.
Methods: Forty patients with abnormal (Group A) and 80 patients with normal (Group B) renal anatomy who had 10-20 mm renal stones were included. They were treated with LithoVue single-use flexible ureteroscopy (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) after ureteric dilatation by two different size semi-rigid ureteroscopes. This technique was chosen as the aim was to exclude any ureteric pathology (e.g., stone or stricture), confirm the placement of a safe guidewire, avoid balloon dilatation of the ureter, and achieve safe insertion of a 12 Fr, 35/45 cm ureteric access sheath with optical and tactile sign and without fluoroscopy image for guidance.
Results: The mean ages were 43 years and 45 years in Group A and Group B, respectively. The mean stone burden was 14.62 (standard deviation: 5.35) mm3 and 14.79 (standard deviation: 4.58) mm3 in Group A and Group B, respectively. There is no significant difference between both groups according to the mean operative time, hospital stay, or stone-free rate. The stone-free rate was about 93% in both groups when the stone size was between 10 mm and 15 mm, and less than 54% when the stone size was more than 15 mm to 20 mm. In the majority of cases (80.0% in Group A and 92.5% in Group B), we completed the procedure without fluoroscopy. The perioperative complication rates were comparable in the two groups.
Conclusion: Fluoroscopy-free single-use flexible ureteroscopy, when performed by expert urologists, is a feasible treatment for pre-stented patients with kidney calculi of ≤15 mm with abnormal renal anatomy.
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(4): 591-595.
Hamdy Aboutaleb, Mohamed Sultan, Ahmed Zaghloul, Yasser Farahat, Maher Gawish, Fouad Zanaty. Is fluoroscopy-free single-use flexible ureteroscopy a feasible treatment for kidney stones with abnormal renal anatomy?. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(4): 591-595.
Raj GV, Auge BK, Assimos D, Preminger GM. Metabolic abnormalities associated with renal calculi in patients with horseshoe kidneys. J Endourol 2004; 18:157-61.
doi: 10.1089/089277904322959798
pmid: 15072623
[2]
Giusti G, Proietti S, Peschechera R, Taverna G, Sortino G, Cindolo L, et al. Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances. World J Urol 2015; 33:257-73.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1345-y
pmid: 24962930
[3]
Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004; 363:345-51.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0
pmid: 15070562
[4]
Manzo BO, Lozada E, Manzo G, Sánchez HM, Gomez F, Figueroa A, et al. Radiation-free flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment. Arab J Urol 2019; 17:200-5.
[5]
Guven S, Yigit P, Tuncel A, Karabulut I, Sahin S, Kilic O, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery of renal stones: a critical multiaspect evaluation of the outcomes by the Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP Study). World J Urol 2021; 39:549-54.
[6]
Türk C, Pet?ík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016; 69:475-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
pmid: 26344917
[7]
Aboutaleb H. Fluoroscopy free flexible ureteroscopy with holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for removal of renal calculi. Arab J Urol 2016; 14:123-30.
[8]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240:205-13.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
pmid: 15273542
[9]
Schoenthaler M, Buchholz N, Farin E, Ather H, Bach C, Bach T, et al. The Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS): a multicenter video-based evaluation of inter-rater reliability. World J Urol 2014; 32:1033-40.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1185-1
pmid: 24135917
[10]
Stein RJ, Desai MM. Management of urolithiasis in the congenitally abnormal kidney (horseshoe and ectopic). Curr Opin Urol 2007; 17:125-31.
pmid: 17285023
[11]
Theiss M, Hofmockel G, Fromüller H. [Laparoscopy in urology. Current status and perspectives]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1993; 118:1331-5. [Article in German].
[12]
Tunc L, Tokgoz H, Tan MO, Kupeli B, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I. Stones in anomalous kidneys: results of treatment by shock wave lithotripsy in 150 patients. Int J Urol 2004; 11:831-6.
pmid: 15479286
[13]
Ganpule AP, Desai MR. Urolithiasis in kidneys with abnormal lie, rotation or form. Curr Opin Urol 2011; 21:145-53.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283435c79
pmid: 21285720
[14]
Astolfi RH, Freschi G, Berti FF, Gattas N, Molina WRJ, Meller A. Flexible ureterorenoscopy in position or fusion anomaly: is it feasible? Rev Assoc Med Bras 2017; 63:685-8.
[15]
Kirac M, Kopru B, Ergin G, Kibar Y, Biri H. Is fluoroscopy necessary during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones? Arab J Urol 2019; 18:112-7.
[16]
Giblin JG, Rubenstein J, Taylor A, Pahira J. Radiation risk to the urologist during endourologic procedures, and a new shield that reduces exposure. Urology 1996; 48:624-7.
pmid: 8886071
[17]
Chen TT, Wang C, Ferrandino MN, Scales CD, Yoshizumi TT, Preminger GM, et al. Radiation exposure during the evaluation and management of nephrolithiasis. J Urol 2015; 194:878-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.118
pmid: 26055822
[18]
Olgin G, Smith D, Alsyouf M, Arenas JL, Engebretsen S, Huang G, et al. Ureteroscopy without fluoroscopy: a feasibility study and comparison with conventional ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2015; 29:625-9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0237
pmid: 25562139
[19]
Emiliani E, Kanashiro A, Chi T, Pérez-Fentes DA, Manzo BO, Angerri O, et al. Fluoroless endourological surgery for stone disease: a review of the literature-tips and tricks. Curr Urol Rep 2020; 21:27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-00979-y.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00979-y
pmid: 32444987
[20]
Majdalany SE, Levin BA, Ghani KR. The efficiency of Moses technology holmium laser for treating renal stones during flexible ureteroscopy: relationship between stone volume, time, and energy. J Endourol 2021; 35(Suppl. 3):S14-21. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0592.
doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0592
pmid: 34910609
[21]
Aldoukhi AH, Black KM, Ghani KR. Emerging laser techniques for the management of stones. Urol Clin 2019; 46:193-205.
[22]
Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi. J Urol 1998; 160:346-51.
pmid: 9679874
[23]
Portis AJ, Rygwall R, Holtz C, Pshon N, Laliberte M. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup. J Urol 2006; 175:2129-34.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00311-9
pmid: 16697818
[24]
Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol 2012; 19:264-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02931.x
pmid: 22145599
[25]
Lavan L, Herrmann T, Netsch C, Becker B, Somani BK. Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in anomalous kidneys: a systematic review. World J Urol 2020; 38:1135-46.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02810-x
pmid: 31101967
[26]
Mahmood SN, Toffeq H, Fakhralddin S. Sheathless and fluoroscopy-free retrograde intrarenal surgery: an attractive way of renal stone management in high-volume stone centers. Asian J Urol 2020; 7:309-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.07.003
pmid: 32742931
[27]
Senel C, Tuncel A, Balci M, Asfuroglu A, Aykanat C, Guzel O, et al. Safety and reliability of fluoroscopy-free technique in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2018; 70:606-11.
doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03228-9
pmid: 30230298
Luis G. Medina, Randall A. Lee, Valeria Celis, Veronica Rodriguez, Jaime Poncel, Aref S. Sayegh, Rene Sotelo. Robotic management of urinary fistula[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 357
-365
.
