Please wait a minute...
Search Asian J Urol Advanced Search
Share 
Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(4): 545-554    doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2024.01.001
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma intracavernous injection for patients with erectile dysfunction: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
Sally Suharyania,Moses Leonardoa,Heru Harsojo Oentoengb,Edwin Raja Pardamean Lumban Tobingc,Christiano Tansolc,Timotius Ivan Hariyantoa*()
aFaculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Indonesia
bDepartment of Andrology and Sexual Medicine, Siloam Hospitals Kebon Jeruk, Jakarta, Indonesia
cDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Indonesia
下载:  HTML  PDF (4537KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract: 

Objective: Intracavernous injection might be offered to patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who did not respond to the first-line oral treatment. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) might offer improvement in erectile function since it contains numerous growth factors. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP intracavernous injection for patients with ED.

Methods: We conducted relevant literature searches on Cochrane Library, Medline, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ databases using specific keywords. The results of continuous variables were pooled into the mean difference (MD) and dichotomous variables into the odds ratio along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results: A total of six studies were included. Our pooled analysis revealed that PRP intracavernous injection was associated with a significant increase in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function at 1 month (MD 3.47 [95% CI 2.62-4.32], p<0.00001, I2=7%), 3 months (MD 3.19 [95% CI 2.25-4.12], p<0.00001, I2=0%), and 6 months (MD 3.21 [95% CI 2.30-4.13], p<0.00001, I2=0%) after the intervention when compared with baseline values. PRP was also superior to a placebo in terms of improvement in erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function score at 1 month (MD 2.83, p<0.00001), 3 months (MD 2.87, p<0.00001), and 6 months (MD 3.20, p<0.00001) post-intervention. The adverse events from PRP injection were only mild without any serious adverse events.

Conclusion: PRP intracavernous injection may offer benefits in improving erectile function in patients with ED with a relatively good safety profile.

Key words:  Erectile function    Sexual dysfunction    Platelet-rich plasmaUrology    Treatment
收稿日期:  2023-03-01           接受日期:  2023-05-05      出版日期:  2024-10-20      发布日期:  2024-11-20      整期出版日期:  2024-10-20
引用本文:    
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(4): 545-554.
Sally Suharyani, Moses Leonardo, Heru Harsojo Oentoeng, Edwin Raja Pardamean Lumban Tobing, Christiano Tansol, Timotius Ivan Hariyanto. Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma intracavernous injection for patients with erectile dysfunction: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(4): 545-554.
链接本文:  
http://www.ajurology.com/CN/10.1016/j.ajur.2024.01.001  或          http://www.ajurology.com/CN/Y2024/V11/I4/545
  
Study Design Sample size, n PRP injection dose ED severity, % ED duration,montha Age, mean,year BMI, mean,kg/m2 HT, % DM,% Smoker,%
Poulios et al., 2021 [17] Double-blind RCT • 60 (intervention group: 30; control group: 30)
Two sessions of PRP injection (1 month apart): a total of 5 mL PRP was infused in each corpus cavernosum over a 2 min period
·-
Mild: 33
·-
Mild to moderate: 54
·-
Moderate: 13
78.7±54.6 57.7 28.8 30 25 58
Schirmann et al., 2022 [18] Prospective study • 15
Three sessions of PRP injection (15 days apart): 3 mL PRP was injected into each corpus cavernosum (total 6 mL) with additional of 6 mL injected subcutaneously
·-
Moderate: 60
·-
Severe: 40
NA 56.1 NA 46.7 66.7 93.3
Shaher et al., 2023 [19] Double-blind RCT • 100 (intervention group: 50; control group: 50)
Two sessions of PRP injection (2 weeks apart): 3 mL PRP was injected into each corpus cavernosum at three different sites: 1 cm proximal to the corona, 1 cm distal to the root of penis, and at the mid-penile shaft
·-
Mild: 28
·-
Mild to moderate: 53
·-
Moderate: 19
43.5±14.1 54.9 25 32 32 55
Ta? et al., 2021 [20] Prospective study • 31
Three sessions of PRP injection (15 days apart): 3 mL PRP was injected into each corpus cavernosum with sites of injection varying by 1 cm in the mid-penile region
- NA 64.2±46.6 54.4 30.8 51.6 51.6 NA
Wong et al., 2021 [21] Prospective study • 30
Three sessions of PRP injection (3 weeks apart): 1-2 mL PRP was injected into each corpus cavernosum
- NA 25.7 54.9 25.7 40 16.7 30
Zaghloul et al., 2021 [22] Prospective study • 34
Eight sessions of PRP injection (1 week apart): 0.5 mL PRP was injected into each corpus cavernosum (total of 1 mL)
- NA 26.5±23.8 50.2 NA 5.9 38.2 35.3
  
  
  
  
  
[1] Yafi FA, Jenkins L, Albersen M, Corona G, Isidori AM, Goldfarb S, et al. Erectile dysfunction. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2:16003. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.3.
doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.3 pmid: 27188339
[2] Gratzke C, Angulo J, Chitaley K, Dai YT, Kim NN, Paick JS, et al. Anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7:445-75.
[3] Nguyen HMT, Gabrielson AT, Hellstrom WJG. Erectile dysfunction in young menda review of the prevalence and risk factors. Sex Med Rev 2017; 5:508-20.
doi: S2050-0521(17)30050-1 pmid: 28642047
[4] Kessler A, Sollie S, Challacombe B, Briggs K, Van Hemelrijck M. The global prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a review. BJU Int 2019; 124:587-99.
doi: 10.1111/bju.14813
[5] Alamri AA, Al-Qahtani FS, Alsamghan AS, Alahmari FS, Alahmari SA, Alsharif NM, et al. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction among smokers in southwestern Saudi Arabia. J Mens Health 2022; 18:92. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jomh1804092.
[6] Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol 2018; 200:633-41.
doi: S0022-5347(18)43100-X pmid: 29746858
[7] Karakus S, Burnett AL. The medical and surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction: a review and update. Can J Urol 2020; 27(S3):28-35. PMID: 32876000.
pmid: 32876000
[8] Krzastek SC, Bopp J, Smith RP, Kovac JR. Recent advances in the understanding and management of erectile dysfunction. F1000Res 2019: 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):102. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16576.1.
[9] Scott S, Roberts M, Chung E. Platelet-rich plasma and treatment of erectile dysfunction: critical review of literature and global trends in platelet-rich plasma clinics. Sex Med Rev 2019; 7:306-12.
doi: S2050-0521(19)30001-0 pmid: 30833169
[10] Epifanova MV, Gvasalia BR, Durashov MA, Artemenko SA. Platelet-rich plasma therapy for male sexual dysfunction: myth or reality? Sex Med Rev 2020; 8:106-13.
doi: S2050-0521(19)30008-3 pmid: 30898594
[11] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021 ; 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
[12] Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane; 2022. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. [Accessed 11 January 2023].
[13] Sterne JAC, Savovi? J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.
[14] Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savovi? J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919.
[15] Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res 2018; 27:1785-805.
doi: 10.1177/0962280216669183 pmid: 27683581
[16] Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 pmid: 25524443
[17] Poulios E, Mykoniatis I, Pyrgidis N, Zilotis F, Kapoteli P, Kotsiris D, et al. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) improves erectile function: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Sex Med 2021; 18:926-35.
[18] Schirmann A, Boutin E, Faix A, Yiou R. Pilot study of intracavernous injections of platelet-rich plasma (P-shot®) in the treatment of vascular erectile dysfunction. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1440-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.05.002 pmid: 35697553
[19] Shaher H, Fathi A, Elbashir S, Abdelbaki SA, Soliman T. Is platelet rich plasma safe and effective in treatment of erectile dysfunction? Randomized controlled study. Urology 2023; 175:114-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.028 pmid: 36736914
[20] Ta? T, ?ak?ro?lu B, Arda E, Onuk ?, Nuho?lu B. Early clinical results of the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma administration in erectile dysfunction. Sex Med 2021; 9:100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100313.
[21] Wong SM, Chiang BJ, Chen HC, Wu YN, Lin YH, Liao CH. A short term follow up for intracavernosal injection of platelet rich plasma for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Urol Sci 2021; 32:171-6.
[22] Zaghloul AS, Mahmoud ElNashar AER, GamalEl Din SF, Zaki Said S, Saad HM, Refaat Eldebs H, et al. Smoking status and the baseline international index of erectile function score can predict satisfactory response to platelet-rich plasma in patients with erectile dysfunction: a prospective pilot study. Andrologia 2021; 53:e14162. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.14162.
[23] Thornton A, Lee P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53:207-16.
[24] Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, Olkin I. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat Med 2003; 22:2113-26.
doi: 10.1002/sim.1461 pmid: 12820277
[25] Rodríquez Vela L, Gonzalvo Ibarra A, Pascual Regueiro D, Rioja Sanz LA. [Erectile dysfunction]. Actas Urol Esp 2002; 26:667-90. [Article in Spanish].
pmid: 12508460
[26] Rew KT, Heidelbaugh JJ. Erectile dysfunction. Am Fam Physician 2016; 94:820-7.
pmid: 27929275
[27] Britt D, Blankstein U, Lenardis M, Millman A, Grober E, Krakowsky Y. Availability of platelet-rich plasma for treatment of erectile dysfunction and associated costs and efficacy: a review of current publications and Canadian data. Can Urol Assoc J 2021; 15:202-6.
[28] Alkandari MH, Touma N, Carrier S. Platelet-rich plasma injections for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease: a systematic review of evidence. Sex Med Rev 2022; 10:341-52.
[29] Yuan Y, Hunt RH. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:1086-92.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.118 pmid: 19417748
[30] Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4 pmid: 29316881
[31] Hackenbroich S, Kranke P, Meybohm P, Weibel S. Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials. Syst Rev 2022; 11:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02048-6.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02048-6 pmid: 36028879
[32] Scherer RW, Saldanha IJ. How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches. Syst Rev 2019; 8:264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0.
[33] Chalyj ME, Grigorjan VA, Epifanova MV, Krasnov AO. [The effectiveness of intracavernous autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of erectile dysfunction]. Urologiia 2015;(4):76-9. [Article in Russian].
[34] Matz EL, Pearlman AM, Terlecki RP. Safety and feasibility of platelet rich fibrin matrix injections for treatment of common urologic conditions. Investig Clin Urol 2018; 59:61-5.
doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.1.61 pmid: 29333517
No related articles found!
[1] Brian W. Chao, Daniel D. Eun. Robotic reconstructive surgery: The time has arrived[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 339 -340 .
[2] Tenny R. Zhang, Ashley Alford, Lee C. Zhao. Summarizing the evidence for robotic-assisted bladder neck reconstruction: Systematic review of patency and incontinence outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 341 -347 .
[3] Jonathan Rosenfeld, Devin Boehm, Aidan Raikar, Devyn Coskey, Matthew Lee, Emily Ji, Ziho Lee. A review of complications after ureteral reconstruction[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 348 -356 .
[4] Luis G. Medina, Randall A. Lee, Valeria Celis, Veronica Rodriguez, Jaime Poncel, Aref S. Sayegh, Rene Sotelo. Robotic management of urinary fistula[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 357 -365 .
[5] Shuaishuai Chai, Hao Zhang, Gong Cheng, Jiawei Chen, Xincheng Gao, Yuancheng Zhou, Xingyuan Xiao, Bing Li. Minimally invasive reconstruction of extensive mid-lower ureteral strictures using a bilateral Boari flap[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 377 -383 .
[6] David Strauss, Eric Cho, Matthew Loecher, Matthew Lee, Daniel Eun. Description of a novel robotic early post-prostatectomy anastomotic repair technique and institutional outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 366 -372 .
[7] Matthew Lee, Elizabeth Nagoda, David Strauss, Matthew Loecher, Michael Stifelman, Lee Zhao. Role of buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty in the surgical management of pyeloplasty failure[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 373 -376 .
[8] Yiren Yang, Xinxin Gan, Wei Zhang, Baohua Zhu, Zhao Huangfu, Xiaolei Shi, Linhui Wang. Research progress of the Hippo signaling pathway in renal cell carcinoma[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(4): 511 -520 .
[9] Sidhartha Kalra, Atanu Kumar Pal, Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan. Understanding female urinary continence—lessons from complications of female urethral surgery[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(3): 504 -506 .
[10] Claudia-Gabriela Moldovanu. Virtual and augmented reality systems and three-dimensional printing of the renal model—novel trends to guide preoperative planning for renal cancer[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2024, 11(4): 521 -529 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed