Please wait a minute...
Search Asian J Urol Advanced Search
Share 
Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 264-273    doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.06.005
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
Retrograde intrarenal surgery: An expanding role in treatment of urolithiasis
María Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero,Steeve Doizi,Etienne Xavier Keller,Vincent De Coninck,Olivier Traxer()
Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique H?pitaux de Paris, Paris, France
下载:  HTML  PDF (464KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
（）
作者相关文章
Abstract: 

During the past 3 decades, the surgical management of kidney stones has undergone many technological advances and one is the development of the flexible ureteroscopy. The development of this instrument as well as ancillary equipment such as baskets, graspers, and others, and improvements in lithotripsy with Holmium: YAG laser have led to expand its indications with diagnostic and therapeutic management of medical issues of the upper urinary tract such as urolithiasis and urothelial tumors. The objective of this review is to describe its indications and results in the different scenarios for the treatment of urinary stones.
Key words:  Ureteroscopy    Retrograde intrarenalsurgery    Endourology    Urolithiasis
收稿日期:  2018-04-13      修回日期:  2018-05-05           出版日期:  2018-10-20      发布日期:  2018-11-19      整期出版日期:  2018-10-20
引用本文:    
. [J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 264-273.
María Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero,Steeve Doizi,Etienne Xavier Keller,Vincent De Coninck,Olivier Traxer. Retrograde intrarenal surgery: An expanding role in treatment of urolithiasis. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 264-273.
链接本文:  
http://www.ajurology.com/CN/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.06.005  或          http://www.ajurology.com/CN/Y2018/V5/I4/264
AUA/ES recommendation Grade of recommendation EAU recommendation Level of evidence
Surgical management of distal uretal stones >10 mm Strong recommendation >10 mm -
1. URS 1. URS
2. SWL 2. SWL
<10 mm Strong recommendation <10 mm URS or SWL -
1. URS
2. SWL
URS for cystine or uric acid ureteral stones Expert opinion
Surgical management of proximal uretal stones >10 mm 1. URS Strong recommendation >10 mm -
1. URS
2. SWL
<10 mm 1. URS Strong recommendation <10 mm -
1. URS
2. SWL
For severe obesity, URS is a more promising option than SWL. 2b
Use PCNL for ureteral stones as an alternative when SWL is not indicated or has failed or when URS is impossible. -
Table 1  AUA and EAU guidelines on ureteral stones.
AUA/ES Recommendation Grade of recommendation EAU recommendation Level of evidence
Surgical management of renal stones, lower pole excluded <10 mm
SWL or fURS
10-20 mm
SWL or fURS
>20 mm
1. PCNL
2. fURS
No SWL as first-line treatment		 Strong recommendation <10 mm
1. SWL or fURS		 -
2. PCNL
Strong recommendation 10-20 mm
SWL or endourology (fURS or PCNL)		 -
Strong recommendation >20 mm
1. PCNL		 -
Strong recommendation 2. SWL or fURS
Strong recommendation
Surgical management of renal stones, lower pole <10 mm
SWL or fURS

10-20 mm
fURS or PCNL
No SWL as first-line treatment
>20 mm
1. PCNL
2. fURS
No SWL as first-line treatment		 Strong recommendation <10 mm
1. SWL or fURS		 -
2. PCNL
Moderate recommendation 10-20 mm
SWL or fURS or PCNL		 -
Strong recommendation
Strong recommendation >20 mm
1. PCNL		 -
Strong recommendation
Strong recommendation		 2. fURS or SWL
Use fURS if PCNL or SWL are not an option (even for stones >2 cm)		 -
Table 2  AUA and EAU guidelines on kidney stones.
[1] Marshall VF . Fiber optics in urology. J Urol 1964; 91:110e4.
[2] Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T, Go T . Clinical application of fiberopticpyeloureteroscope. Urol Int 1971; 26:97e104.
doi: 10.1159/000279719 pmid: 5126015
[3] Bagley DH . Ureteral endoscopy with passively deflectable,irrigating flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 1987; 29:170e3.
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90147-6 pmid: 3811095
[4] Fuchs GJ, Fuchs AM . Flexible endoscopy of the upper urinarytract. A new minimally invasive method for diagnosis andtreatment. Urol Ausg A 1990; 29:313e20 [Article in German].
pmid: 2291255
[5] Dale J, Kaplan AG, Radvak D, Shin R, Ackerman A, Chen T , et al. Evaluation of a novel single-use flexible ureteroscope. JEndourol 2017. https://doi.org/10.1089/end. 2016. 0237.
doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(16)61032-1 pmid: 27981862
[6] Proietti S, Dragos L, Molina W, Doizi S, Giusti G, Traxer O . Comparison of new single-use digital flexible ureteroscopeversus nondisposable fiber optic and digital ureteroscope in acadaveric model. J Endourol 2016; 30:655e9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0051 pmid: 27084572
[7] Doizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, Andreassen KH, Knoll T, Osther PJ , et al. First clinical evaluation of a new single-useflexible ureteroscope (LithoVueTM): a European prospectivemulticentric feasibility study. World J Urol 2017; 35:809e18.
[8] [8a] Rukin NJ, Siddiqui ZA, Chedgy ECP, Somani BK . Trends inupper tract stone disease in england: evidence from thehospital episodes statistics database. Urol Int 2017;98:391e6. [8b] Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK. Worldwide trends ofurinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: asystematic review. J Endourol 2017; 31:547e56.
doi: 10.1159/000449510 pmid: 27694759
[9] Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: a globalpicture of prevalence,incidence, associated risk factors. Rev Urol 2010; 12:e86e96.
doi: 10.3909/riu0459 pmid: 20811557
[10] Trinchieri A, Coppi F, Montanari E, Del Nero A, Zanetti G, Pisani E . Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upperurinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol 2000; 37:23e5.
[11] Amato M, Lusini ML, Nelli F . Epidemiology of nephrolithiasistoday. Urol Int 2004; 72(Suppl. 1):1e5.
[12] Serio A, Fraioli A . Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. Nephron1999; 81(Suppl. 1):26e30.
[13] Daudon M, Traxer O, Lechevallier E, Saussine C . épidémiologiedes lithiases urinaires. Prog Urol 2008; 18:802e14.
[14] Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann KU , Alken P. Study onthe prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germanycomparing the years 1979 vs.2000. Eur Urol M2003;44:709e13.270 M. Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero et al.
doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00415-9 pmid: 14644124
[15] Sánchez-Martín FM, Millán Rodríguez F, Esquena Fernández S, Segarra Tomás J, Rousaud Baròn F, Martínez-Rodríguez R , et al. Incidence and prevalence of published studies abouturolithiasis in Spain. A review. Actas Urol Esp 2007; 31:511e20.
doi: 10.4321/S0210-48062007000500011 pmid: 17711170
[16] Akinci M, Esen T , Tellaloğlu S. Urinary stone disease in Turkey:an updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol 1991; 20:200e3.
[17] Pinduli I , Spivacow R, del Valle E, Vidal S, Negri AL,Previgliano H, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis in the autonomouscity of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Urol Res 2006; 34:8e11.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0003-7 pmid: 16425020
[18] Rob S, Bryant T, Wilson I, Somani BK . Ultra-low-dose, lowdose,and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, andbladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic reviewof the literature. Clin Radiol 2017; 72:11e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.005 pmid: 27810168
[19] Oberlin DT, Flum AS, Bachrach L, Matulewicz RS, Flury SC . Contemporary surgical trends in the management of uppertract calculi. J Urol 2015; 193:880e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.006 pmid: 25219700
[20] Lee MC, Bariol SV . Evolution of stone management inAustralia. BJU Int 2011; 108(Suppl. 2):29e33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10695.x pmid: 22085123
[21] Doizi S, Raynal G, Traxer O . Evolution of urolithiasis treatmentover 30 years in a French academic institution. Prog Urol 2015; 25:543e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.05.002 pmid: 26094095
[22] Johnson GB, Portela D, Grasso M . Advanced ureteros copy:wireless and sheathless. J Endourol 2006; 20:552e5.
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.552 pmid: 16903813
[23] Ulvik ?, Rennesund K, Gjengstø P, Wentzel-Larsen T, Ulvik NM . Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: should thesafety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol 2013; 27:1197e202.
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0248 pmid: 23795760
[24] Dutta R, Vyas A, Landman J, Clayman RV . Death of the safetyguidewire. J Endourol 2016; 30:941e4.
[25] Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, Lee DI, Felfela T, Conradie MC , et al. Characterization of intrapelvic pressureduring ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology2003; 61:713e8.
[26] Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz RW, Preminger GM . Ureteral access sheath provides protectionagainst elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopicstone manipulation. J Endourol 2004; 18:33e6.
doi: 10.1089/089277904322836631 pmid: 15006050
[27] Kaplan AG, Lipkin ME, Scales Jr CD, Preminger GM . Use ofureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy. Nat Rev Urol 2016; 13:135e40.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.271 pmid: 26597613
[28] Al-Qahtani SM, Letendre J, Thomas A, Natalin R, Saussez T, Traxer O . Which ureteral access sheath is compatible withyour flexible ureteroscope? J Endourol 2014; 28:286e90.
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0375 pmid: 24147776
[29] Emre Sener T, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F , Butticè S, Doizi S,et al. Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with goodirrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral accesssheaths? J Endourol 2016; 30:49e55.
[30] Doizi S, Traxer O . Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips andtricks. Urolithiasis 2018; 46:47e58.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1030-x pmid: 29222575
[31] Gupta PK . Is the Holmium:YAG laser the best intracorporeallithotripter for the ureter? A 3-year retrospective study. JEndourol 2007; 21:305e9.
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0247 pmid: 17444776
[32] Rassweiler J, Rassweiler MC, Klein J . New technology in ureteroscopyand percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol2016; 26:95e106.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000240 pmid: 26626887
[33] Zhong P, Tong HL, Cocks FH, Pearle MS, Preminger GM . Transientcavitation and acoustic emission produced by differentlaser lithotripters. J Endourol 1998; 12:371e8.
doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.371 pmid: 9726407
[34] Rassweiler JJ, Klein J . Re: update on lasers in urology. Currentassessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG)laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers. Eur Urol 2016; 70:538e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.026 pmid: 27370176
[35] Hecht SL, Wolf Jr JS . Techniques for holmium laser lithotripsyof intrarenal calculi. Urology 2013; 81:442e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.021 pmid: 23374826
[36] Chawla SN, Chang MF, Chang A, Lenoir J, Bagley DH . Effectivenessof high-frequency Holmium:YAG laser stone fragmentation:the “popcorn effect”. J Endourol 2008; 22:645e50.
doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9843 pmid: 18307379
[37] Emiliani E, Talso M, Cho SY, Baghdadi M, Mahmoud S , PinheiroH, et al. Optimal settings for the noncontact Holmium:YAG stone fragmentation popcorn technique. J Urol 2017; 198:702e6.
pmid: 28442384
[38] Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D, Xue W, Roelofs A, Duvdevani M , et al. Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renalstone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office ofEndourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) GlobalStudy. BJU Int 2016; 117:648e54.
doi: 10.1111/bju.13250 pmid: 26237735
[39] Nabi G, Cook J, N’Dow J , McClinton S. Outcomes of stentingafter uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review andmeta-analysis. BMJ 2007; 334:572. .
[40] Song T, Liao B, Zheng S, Wei Q . Meta-analysis of postoperativelystenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopiclithotripsy. Urol Res 2012; 40:67e77.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0385-7 pmid: 21573923
[41] Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP , et al. Surgical management of stones: AmericanUrological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PartI. J Urol 2016; 196:1153e60.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091 pmid: 27238616
[42] Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP , et al. Surgical management of stones: AmericanUrological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PartII. J Urol 2016; 196:1161e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091 pmid: 27238616
[43] EAU-Guidelines-on-Urolithiasis. Professionals S-O. Urolithiasis[Internet]. Uroweb. [cited 2018 Apr 4]. Available from: .
[44] Ishii H, Couzins M, Aboumarzouk O, Biyani CS, Somani BK . Outcomes of systematic review of ureteroscopy for stonedisease in the obese and morbidly obese population. JEndourol 2016; 30:135e45.
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0547 pmid: 26415049
[45] Drake T, Grivas N, Dabestani S, Knoll T, Lam T, Maclennan S , et al. What are the benefits and harms of ureteroscopycompared with shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment ofupper ureteral stones? A systematic review. Eur Urol 2017; 72:772e86.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016 pmid: 28456350
[46] Hwang I, Jung SI, Kim KH, Hwang EC, Yu HS, Kim SO , et al. Factors influencing the failure of extracorporeal shock wavelithotripsy with piezolith 3000 in the management of solitaryureteral stone. Urolithiasis 2014; 42:263e7.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0641-8 pmid: 24496560
[47] Karadag MA, Demir A, Cecen K, Bagcioglu M, Kocaaslan R, Altunrende F . Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus semirigidureteroscopy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: aretrospective comparative analysis of 124 patients. Urol J2014; 11:1867e72.
doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2008.04.001 pmid: 26341779
[48] Perez Castro E, Osther PJS, Jinga V, Razvi H, Stravodimos KG, Parikh K , et al. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatmentand outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureterallocations: the Clinical Research Office of the EndourologicalSociety Ureteroscopy Global Study. Eur Urol 2014; 66:102e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011 pmid: 24507782
[49] Alkan E, Sar?bacak A, Ozkanli AO, Basar MM, Acar O , Balbay MD.Flexible ureteroscopy can be more efficacious in the treatmentof proximal ureteral stones in select patients. Adv Urol 2015; 2015:416031.
[50] Dessyn JF, Balssa L, Chabannes E, Jacquemet B, Bernardini S, Bittard H , et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal andproximal ureteral stone in patients with previous ureteralstenting: impact on stone-free rate and morbidity. J Endourol2016; 30:1084e8.
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0045 pmid: 27527667
[51] Sun X, Xia S, Lu J, Liu H, Han B, Li W . Treatment of largeimpacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison ofpercutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrogradeureterolithotripsy. J Endourol 2008; 22:913e7.
doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0230 pmid: 18429682
[52] Stuurman RE, Al-Qahtani SM, Cornu JN, Traxer O . Antegradepercutaneous flexible endoscopic approach for the managementof urinary diversion-associated complications. JEndourol 2013; 27:1330e4.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0371 pmid: 23537189
[53] Inoue T, Okada S, Hamamoto S, Yoshida T, Matsuda T . Currenttrends and pitfalls in endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis. IntJ Urol . 2018; 25:121e33.
doi: 10.1111/iju.13491 pmid: 29136679
[54] Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E, Eren MT, Bakkaloglu M, Ozen H . Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomaticlower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 2007; 177:2189e92.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.154 pmid: 17509315
[55] Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O . Flexibleureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the managementof renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: amulti-institutional experience. J Endourol 2010; 24:1583e8.
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0629 pmid: 20629566
[56] Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK . Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: asystematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2012; 26:1257e63.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0217 pmid: 22642568
[57] De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R , et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenalsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol2015; 67:125e37.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003 pmid: 25064687
[58] Breda A, Angerri O . Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidneystones larger than 2.5 cm. Curr Opin Urol 2014; 24:179e83.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000030 pmid: 24451091
[59] Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D . Retrograde ureteropyeloscopictreatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minorStaghorn calculi. J Urol 1998; 160:346e51.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62892-1 pmid: 9679874
[60] Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, Ugurlu M, Tekinarslan E, Kezer C , et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy andretrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of2e4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2012; 109:1384e9.
doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(11)61500-5 pmid: 22212287
[61] Giusti G, Proietti S, Villa L, Cloutier J, Rosso M, Gadda GM , et al. Current standard technique for modern flexible ureteroscopy:tips and tricks. Eur Urol 2016; 70:188e94.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.035 pmid: 27086502
[62] Jessen JP, Honeck P, Knoll T, Wendt-Nordahl G . Flexible ureterorenoscopyfor lower pole stones: influence of the collectingsystem’s anatomy. J Endourol 2014; 28:146e51.
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0401 pmid: 24083332
[63] Jung GH, Jung JH, Ahn TS, Lee JS, Cho SY, Jeong CW , et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a singlesessionpercutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stoneswith a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: a propensity score-matchingstudy. Korean J Urol 2015; 56:525e32.
[64] Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C , et al. Retrogradeintrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomyversus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment oflower pole renal stones: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Endourol 2015; 29:745e59.
[65] Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, Ozgor F, Seyrek M, Ozkuvanci U , et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital andfiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol2010; 24:1929e34.
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0211 pmid: 21043835
[66] Akman T, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Sari E, Seyrek M, Kaba M , et al. Tubeless procedure is most important factor in reducinglength of hospitalization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy:results of univariable and multivariable models. Urology 2011; 77:299e304.
doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(10)61690-9 pmid: 20970842
[67] Lee JW, Park J, Lee SB, Son H, Cho SY, Jeong H . Mini-percutaneousnephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery forrenal stones larger than 10 mm: a prospective randomizedcontrolled trial. Urology 2015; 86:873e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.011 pmid: 26320082
[68] Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M . Treating renal calculi1e2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrogradeintrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int2012;110:E346e9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11089.x pmid: 22487401
[69] Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, Ganpule AP, Jagtap J, Desai MR . Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vsretrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of smallrenal calculi: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2013; 112:355e61.
doi: 10.1111/bju.12164 pmid: 23826843
[70] Kirac M, Bozkurt Ö F, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H . Comparisonof retrograde intrarenal surgery and minipercutaneousnephrolithotomy in management of lower-polerenal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis2013; 41:241e6.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0552-0 pmid: 23483226
[71] Ferroud V, Lapouge O, Dousseau A, Rakototiana A, Robert G, Ballanger P. Flexible ureteroscopy and mini percutaneousnephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal lithiasis less orequal to 2 cm. Prog Urol. 2011 Feb; 21:79e84.
doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2010.08.013 pmid: 21296273
[72] Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrogradeintrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev 2014; 24. .
[73] Donaldson JF, Lardas M, Scrimgeour D, Stewart F , MacLennan S,Lam TBL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of theclinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrogradeintrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy forlower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol 2015; 67:612e6.
[74] Martin F, Hoarau N, Lebdai S, Pichon T, Chautard D, Culty T , et al. Impact of lower pole calculi in patients undergoingretrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol 2014; 28:141e5.
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0515 pmid: 24063300
[75] Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NPN, Chomòn GB, Grasso M, Saba P , et al. Operating times and bleeding complicationsin percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison oftract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the ClinicalResearch Office of the Endourological Society PercutaneousNephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol 2011; 25:933e9.
[76] Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M , et al. 2007 Guideline for the management ofureteral calculi. Eur Urol 2007; 52:1610e31.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107 pmid: 18074433
[77] Cepeda M, Amòn JH, Mainez JA, Rodríguez V, Alonso D, Martínez-Sagarra JM . Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones. Actas Urol Esp 2014; 38:571e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2014.09.008 pmid: 24881777
[78] Somani BK, Giusti G, Sun Y, Osther PJ, Frank M, De Sio M , et al. Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy (URS) relatedto treatment of urolithiasis: the clinical research office ofendourological society URS global study. World J Urol 2017; 35:675e81.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1909-0 pmid: 27492012
[79] Karlsen SJ, Renkel J, Tahir AR, Angelsen A, Diep LM . Extracorporealshockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for 5- to10-mm stones in the proximal ureter: prospective effectivenesspatient-preference trial. J Endourol 2007; 21:28e33.
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0153 pmid: 17263604
[80] Fan S, Gong B, Hao Z, Zhang L, Zhou J, Zhang Y , et al. Riskfactors of infectious complications following flexible ureteroscopewith a holmium laser: a retrospective study. Int JClin Exp Med 2015; 8:11252e9.
pmid: 26379932
[81] Cui Y, Cao W, Shen H, Xie J, Adams TS, Zhang Y , et al. Comparisonof ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy inmanagement of ureteral stones. PLoS One 2014; 9..
[82] Yohannes P, Smith AD . The endourological management ofcomplications associated with horseshoe kidney. J Urol 2002; 168:5e8.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64819-7 pmid: 12050480
[83] Weizer AZ, Silverstein AD, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, Raj G, Albala DM , et al. Determining the incidence of horseshoekidney from radiographic data at a single institution. J Urol2003; 170:1722e6.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092537.96414.4a pmid: 14532762
[84] Molimard B, Al-Qahtani S, Lakmichi A, Sejiny M , Gil-Diez deMedina S, Carpentier X, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy withholmium laser in horseshoe kidneys. Urology 2010; 76:1334e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.072 pmid: 20573385
[85] Atis G, Resorlu B, Gurbuz C, Arikan O, Ozyuvali E, Unsal A , et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoekidneys. Urolithiasis 2013; 41:79e83.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0534-7 pmid: 23532428
[86] Stein RJ, Desai MM . Management of urolithiasis in thecongenitally abnormal kidney (horseshoe and ectopic). CurrOpin Urol 2007; 17:125e31.
doi: 10.1108/07363760510576527 pmid: 17285023
[87] Bozkurt OF, Tepeler A, Sninsky B, Ozyuvali E, Ziypak T, Atis G , et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of kidneystone within pelvic ectopic kidney. Urology 2014; 84:1285e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.041 pmid: 25288574
[88] Assimos DG . Nephrolithiasis in patients with urinary diversion. J Urol 1996; 155:69e70.
pmid: 7490901
[89] Yang WJ, Cho KS, Rha KH, Lee HY, Chung BH, Hong SJ , et al. Long-term effects of ileal conduit urinary diversion on upperurinary tract in bladder cancer. Urology 2006; 68:324e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.015 pmid: 16904445
[90] el-Nahas AR, Eraky I, el-Assmy AM, Shoma AM, el-Kenawy MR, Abdel-Latif M, et al. Percutaneous treatmentof large upper tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology2006; 68:500e4.
[91] Waingankar N, Hayek S, Smith AD, Okeke Z . Calyceal diverticula:a comprehensive review. Rev Urol 2014; 16:29e43.
pmid: 24791153
[92] Chen X, Li D, Dai Y, Bai Y, Luo Q, Zhao Z , et al. Retrogradeintrarenal surgery in the management of symptomatic calycealdiverticular stones: a single center experience. Urolithiasis2015; 43:557e62.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0800-6 pmid: 26139572
[93] Bas O, Ozyuvali E, Aydogmus Y, Sener NC, Dede O, Ozgun S , et al. Management of calyceal diverticular calculi: a comparisonof percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis 2015; 43:155e61.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0725-5 pmid: 25249328
[94] Sarica K . Pediatric urolithiasis: etiology, specific pathogenesisand medical treatment. Urol Res 2006; 34:96e101.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0018-0 pmid: 16432692
[95] Turney BW, Reynard JM, Noble JG, Keoghane SR . Trends inurological stone disease. BJU Int 2012; 109:1082e7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10495.x pmid: 21883851
[96] Salerno A, Nappo SG, Matarazzo E, De Dominicis M, Caione P . Treatment of pediatric renal stones in a Western country: achanging pattern. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48:835e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.09.058 pmid: 23583143
[97] Azili MN, Ozcan F, Tiryaki T . Retrograde intrarenal surgery for thetreatment of renal stones in children: factors influencing stoneclearance and complications. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49:1161e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.023 pmid: 24952809
[98] Resorlu B, Sancak EB, Resorlu M, Gulpinar MT, Adam G, Akbas A , et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in pediatric patients. World J Nephrol 2014; 3:193e7.
No related articles found!
[1] Zhixiang Wang, Bing Liu, Xiaofeng Gao, Yi Bao, Yang Wang, Huamao Ye, Yinghao Sun, Linhui Wang. Laparoscopic ureterolysis with simultaneous ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephroscopy for treating complex ureteral obstruction after failed endoscopic intervention: A technical report[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2015, 2(4): 238 -243 .
[2] Louis R. Kavoussi. News from leading international academic urology departments[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(1): 1 -2 .
[3] Rikiya Taoka, Yoshiyuki Kakehi. The influence of asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis on the onset and progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with histologic benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(3): 158 -163 .
[4] Cheuk Fan Shum, Weida Lau, Chang Peng Colin Teo. Medical therapy for clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia:a1 Antagonists, 5a reductase inhibitors and their combination[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(3): 185 -190 .
[5] Foo Keong Tatt. Current consensus and controversies on male LUTS/BPH (part two)[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(1): 8 -9 .
[6] Rishi R. Sekar, Claire M. De La Calle, Dattatraya Patil, Sarah A. Holzman, Yoram Baum, Umer Sheikh, Jonathan H. Huang, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Brian P. Pollack, Haydn T. Kissick, Kenneth Ogan, Viraj A. Master. Major histocompatibility complex I upregulation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma is associated with increased survival[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2016, 3(2): 75 -81 .
[7] Ryan Yu, Jefferson Terry, Mutaz Alnassar, Jorge Demaria. Pediatric fibrous pseudotumor of the tunica vaginalis testis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2016, 3(2): 99 -102 .
[8] Aso Omer Rashid, Saman Salih Fakhulddin. Risk factors for fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2016, 3(2): 82 -87 .
[9] Christopher Hartman, Nikhil Gupta, David Leavitt, David Hoenig, Zeph Okeke, Arthur Smith. Advances in percutaneous stone surgery[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2015, 2(1): 26 -32 .
[10] Aldamanhori Reem,I.Osman Nadir,R.Chapple Christopher. Underactive bladder: Pathophysiology and clinical significance[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(1): 17 -21 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
Asian Journal of Urology, ISSN 2214-3882 (Print), ISSN 2214-3890 (Online), CN 31-2124/R
Copyright © Asian Journal of Urology Except Certain Content Provded by Third Parties
沪ICP备14033887号-1 Shanghai, China; E-mail: ajurology@smmu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd